scholarly journals FLIP(L) determines p53 induced life or death

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Lees ◽  
Alexander J. McIntyre ◽  
Fiammetta Falcone ◽  
Nyree T. Crawford ◽  
Christopher McCann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Hdac Inhibitors ◽  
Caspase 8 ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
P53 Activation ◽  
P53 Target Genes ◽  
Mdm2 Inhibitor

AbstractHow p53 differentially activates cell cycle arrest versus cell death remains poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that upregulation of canonical pro-apoptotic p53 target genes in colon cancer cells imposes a critical dependence on the long splice form of the caspase-8 regulator FLIP (FLIP(L)), which we identify as a direct p53 transcriptional target. Inhibiting FLIP(L) expression with siRNA or Class-I HDAC inhibitors promotes apoptosis in response to p53 activation by the MDM2 inhibitor Nutlin-3A, which otherwise predominantly induces cell-cycle arrest. When FLIP(L) upregulation is inhibited, apoptosis is induced in response to p53 activation via a novel ligand-independent TRAIL-R2/caspase-8 complex, which, by activating BID, induces mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis. Notably, FLIP(L) depletion inhibits p53-induced expression of the cell cycle regulator p21 and enhances p53-mediated upregulation of PUMA, with the latter activating mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis in FLIP(L)-depleted, Nutlin-3A-treated cells lacking TRAIL-R2/caspase-8. Thus, we report two previously undescribed, novel FLIP(L)-dependent mechanisms that determine cell fate following p53 activation.

scholarly journals The pseudo-caspase FLIP(L) regulates cell fate following p53 activation

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (30) ◽  
pp. 17808-17819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Lees ◽  
Alexander J. McIntyre ◽  
Nyree T. Crawford ◽  
Fiammetta Falcone ◽  
Christopher McCann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Caspase 8 ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
P53 Activation ◽  
Induced Apoptosis

p53 is the most frequently mutated, well-studied tumor-suppressor gene, yet the molecular basis of the switch from p53-induced cell-cycle arrest to apoptosis remains poorly understood. Using a combination of transcriptomics and functional genomics, we unexpectedly identified a nodal role for the caspase-8 paralog and only human pseudo-caspase, FLIP(L), in regulating this switch. Moreover, we identify FLIP(L) as a direct p53 transcriptional target gene that is rapidly up-regulated in response to Nutlin-3A, an MDM2 inhibitor that potently activates p53. Genetically or pharmacologically inhibiting expression of FLIP(L) using siRNA or entinostat (a clinically relevant class-I HDAC inhibitor) efficiently promoted apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells in response to Nutlin-3A, which otherwise predominantly induced cell-cycle arrest. Enhanced apoptosis was also observed when entinostat was combined with clinically relevant, p53-activating chemotherapy in vitro, and this translated into enhanced in vivo efficacy. Mechanistically, FLIP(L) inhibited p53-induced apoptosis by blocking activation of caspase-8 by the TRAIL-R2/DR5 death receptor; notably, this activation was not dependent on receptor engagement by its ligand, TRAIL. In the absence of caspase-8, another of its paralogs, caspase-10 (also transcriptionally up-regulated by p53), induced apoptosis in Nutlin-3A-treated, FLIP(L)-depleted cells, albeit to a lesser extent than in caspase-8-proficient cells. FLIP(L) depletion also modulated transcription of canonical p53 target genes, suppressing p53-induced expression of the cell-cycle regulator p21 and enhancing p53-induced up-regulation of proapoptotic PUMA. Thus, even in the absence of caspase-8/10, FLIP(L) silencing promoted p53-induced apoptosis by enhancing PUMA expression. Thus, we report unexpected, therapeutically relevant roles for FLIP(L) in determining cell fate following p53 activation.

scholarly journals Distinct mechanisms control genome recognition by p53 at its target genes linked to different cell fates

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Farkas ◽  
Hideharu Hashimoto ◽  
Yingtao Bi ◽  
Ramana V. Davuluri ◽  
Lois Resnick-Silverman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Binding Modes ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Cycle Arrest

AbstractThe tumor suppressor p53 integrates stress response pathways by selectively engaging one of several potential transcriptomes, thereby triggering cell fate decisions (e.g., cell cycle arrest, apoptosis). Foundational to this process is the binding of tetrameric p53 to 20-bp response elements (REs) in the genome (RRRCWWGYYYN0-13RRRCWWGYYY). In general, REs at cell cycle arrest targets (e.g. p21) are of higher affinity than those at apoptosis targets (e.g., BAX). However, the RE sequence code underlying selectivity remains undeciphered. Here, we identify molecular mechanisms mediating p53 binding to high- and low-affinity REs by showing that key determinants of the code are embedded in the DNA shape. We further demonstrate that differences in minor/major groove widths, encoded by G/C or A/T bp content at positions 3, 8, 13, and 18 in the RE, determine distinct p53 DNA-binding modes by inducing different Arg248 and Lys120 conformations and interactions. The predictive capacity of this code was confirmed in vivo using genome editing at the BAX RE to interconvert the DNA-binding modes, transcription pattern, and cell fate outcome.

scholarly journals Mitochondrial apoptotic priming is a key determinant of cell fate upon p53 restoration

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (23) ◽  
pp. e2019740118
Author(s):  
Francisco J. Sánchez-Rivera ◽  
Jeremy Ryan ◽  
Yadira M. Soto-Feliciano ◽  
Mary Clare Beytagh ◽  
Lucius Xuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Apoptotic Cell ◽  
Genetically Engineered ◽  
Critical Determinant ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
P53 Activation ◽  
P53 Reactivation

Reactivation of p53 in established tumors typically results in one of two cell fates, cell cycle arrest or apoptosis, but it remains unclear how this cell fate is determined. We hypothesized that high mitochondrial priming prior to p53 reactivation would lead to apoptosis, while low priming would lead to survival and cell cycle arrest. Using a panel of Kras-driven, p53 restorable cell lines derived from genetically engineered mouse models of lung adenocarcinoma and sarcoma (both of which undergo cell cycle arrest upon p53 restoration), as well as lymphoma (which instead undergo apoptosis), we show that the level of mitochondrial apoptotic priming is a critical determinant of p53 reactivation outcome. Cells with high initial priming (e.g., lymphomas) lacked sufficient reserve antiapoptotic capacity and underwent apoptosis after p53 restoration. Forced BCL-2 or BCL-XL expression reduced priming and resulted in survival and cell cycle arrest. Cells with low initial priming (e.g., lung adenocarcinoma and sarcoma) survived and proceeded to arrest in the cell cycle. When primed by inhibition of their antiapoptotic proteins using genetic (BCL-2 or BCL-XL deletion or BAD overexpression) or pharmacologic (navitoclax) means, apoptosis resulted upon p53 restoration in vitro and in vivo. These data demonstrate that mitochondrial apoptotic priming is a key determining factor of cell fate upon p53 activation. Moreover, it is possible to enforce apoptotic cell fate following p53 activation in less primed cells using p53-independent drugs that increase apoptotic priming, including BH3 mimetic drugs.

scholarly journals The RASSF6 Tumor Suppressor Protein Regulates Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Progression via Retinoblastoma Protein

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (17) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shakhawoat Hossain ◽  
Hiroaki Iwasa ◽  
Aradhan Sarkar ◽  
Junichi Maruyama ◽  
Kyoko Arimoto-Matsuzaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
P53 Expression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Hct116 Cells

ABSTRACT RASSF6 is a member of the tumor suppressor Ras association domain family (RASSF) proteins. RASSF6 is frequently suppressed in human cancers, and its low expression level is associated with poor prognosis. RASSF6 regulates cell cycle arrest and apoptosis and plays a tumor suppressor role. Mechanistically, RASSF6 blocks MDM2-mediated p53 degradation and enhances p53 expression. However, RASSF6 also induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in a p53-negative background, which implies that the tumor suppressor function of RASSF6 does not depend solely on p53. In this study, we revealed that RASSF6 mediates cell cycle arrest and apoptosis via pRb. RASSF6 enhances the interaction between pRb and protein phosphatase. RASSF6 also enhances P16INK4A and P14ARF expression by suppressing BMI1. In this way, RASSF6 increases unphosphorylated pRb and augments the interaction between pRb and E2F1. Moreover, RASSF6 induces TP73 target genes via pRb and E2F1 in a p53-negative background. Finally, we confirmed that RASSF6 depletion induces polyploid cells in p53-negative HCT116 cells. In conclusion, RASSF6 behaves as a tumor suppressor in cancers with loss of function of p53, and pRb is implicated in this function of RASSF6.

scholarly journals Growth Suppression by Acute PromyelocyticLeukemia-Associated Protein PLZF Is Mediated by Repression ofc-mycExpression

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (24) ◽  
pp. 9375-9388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie J. McConnell ◽  
Nathalie Chevallier ◽  
Windy Berkofsky-Fessler ◽  
Jena M. Giltnane ◽  
Rupal B. Malani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Growth Suppression ◽  
Quiescent State ◽  
Cycle Arrest

ABSTRACT The transcriptional repressor PLZF was identified by its translocation with retinoic acid receptor alpha in t(11;17) acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Ectopic expression of PLZF leads to cell cycle arrest and growth suppression, while disruption of normal PLZF function is implicated in the development of APL. To clarify the function of PLZF in cell growth and survival, we used an inducible PLZF cell line in a microarray analysis to identify the target genes repressed by PLZF. One prominent gene identified was c-myc. The array analysis demonstrated that repression of c-myc by PLZF led to a reduction in c-myc-activated transcripts and an increase in c-myc-repressed transcripts. Regulation of c-myc by PLZF was shown to be both direct and reversible. An interaction between PLZF and the c-myc promoter could be detected both in vitro and in vivo. PLZF repressed the wild-type c-myc promoter in a reporter assay, dependent on the integrity of the binding site identified in vitro. PLZF binding in vivo was coincident with a decrease in RNA polymerase occupation of the c-myc promoter, indicating that repression occurred via a reduction in the initiation of transcription. Finally, expression of c-myc reversed the cell cycle arrest induced by PLZF. These data suggest that PLZF expression maintains a cell in a quiescent state by repressing c-myc expression and preventing cell cycle progression. Loss of this repression through the translocation that occurs in t(11;17) would have serious consequences for cell growth control.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document