scholarly journals De novo DNA methylation by Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b is dispensable for nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells to a pluripotent state

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1035-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Pawlak ◽  
R. Jaenisch
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Somatic Cells ◽  
Nuclear Reprogramming ◽  
Pluripotent State

scholarly journals The DNMT3A PWWP domain is essential for the normal DNA methylation landscape in mouse somatic cells and oocytes

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. e1009570
Author(s):  
Kanako Kibe ◽  
Kenjiro Shirane ◽  
Hiroaki Ohishi ◽  
Shuhei Uemura ◽  
Hidehiro Toh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Somatic Cells ◽  
Pwwp Domain ◽  
Satellite Repeat ◽  
Major Satellite ◽  
Developmental Potential ◽  
Cell Type Specific

DNA methylation at CG sites is important for gene regulation and embryonic development. In mouse oocytes, de novo CG methylation requires preceding transcription-coupled histone mark H3K36me3 and is mediated by a DNA methyltransferase DNMT3A. DNMT3A has a PWWP domain, which recognizes H3K36me2/3, and heterozygous mutations in this domain, including D329A substitution, cause aberrant CG hypermethylation of regions marked by H3K27me3 in somatic cells, leading to a dwarfism phenotype. We herein demonstrate that D329A homozygous mice show greater CG hypermethylation and severer dwarfism. In oocytes, D329A substitution did not affect CG methylation of H3K36me2/3-marked regions, including maternally methylated imprinting control regions; rather, it caused aberrant hypermethylation in regions lacking H3K36me2/3, including H3K27me3-marked regions. Thus, the role of the PWWP domain in CG methylation seems similar in somatic cells and oocytes; however, there were cell-type-specific differences in affected regions. The major satellite repeat was also hypermethylated in mutant oocytes. Contrary to the CA hypomethylation in somatic cells, the mutation caused hypermethylation at CH sites, including CA sites. Surprisingly, oocytes expressing only the mutated protein could support embryonic and postnatal development. Our study reveals that the DNMT3A PWWP domain is important for suppressing aberrant CG hypermethylation in both somatic cells and oocytes but that D329A mutation has little impact on the developmental potential of oocytes.

scholarly journals Differential Recruitment of Methylated CpG Binding Domains by the Orphan Receptor GCNF Initiates the Repression and Silencing of Oct4 Expression

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (24) ◽  
pp. 9471-9483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peili Gu ◽  
Damien Le Menuet ◽  
Arthur C.-K. Chung ◽  
Austin J. Cooney
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Epigenetic Modification ◽  
Es Cells ◽  
Somatic Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Orphan Receptor ◽  
Proximal Promoter ◽  
Es Cell ◽  
Oct4 Expression

ABSTRACT The pluripotent factor Oct4 is a key transcription factor that maintains embryonic stem (ES) cell self-renewal and is down-regulated upon the differentiation of ES cells and silenced in somatic cells. A combination of cis elements, transcription factors, and epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, are involved in the regulation of Oct4 gene expression. Here we show that the orphan nuclear receptor GCNF initiates Oct4 repression and DNA methylation by the differential recruitment of MBD (methylated CpG binding domain) factors to the promoter. Compared with wild-type ES cells and gastrulating embryos, Oct4 repression is lost and its proximal promoter is significantly hypomethylated in RA-differentiated GCNF−/− ES cells. The Oct4 gene is reexpressed in some somatic cells of GCNF−/− embryos, showing that it has not been properly silenced coincident with reduced DNA methylation of its promoter. Efforts to characterize mediators of GCNF's repressive function and DNA methylation of the Oct4 promoter identified methyl-DNA binding proteins, MBD3 and MBD2, as GCNF-interacting factors. In P19 and ES cells, upon differentiation, endogenous GCNF binds to the Oct4 proximal promoter and differentially recruits MBD3 and MBD2. In differentiated GCNF−/− ES cells, recruitment of MBD3 and MBD2 to the Oct4 promoter is lost, and repression of Oct4 expression and DNA methylation fails to occur. RNA interference-mediated knockdown of MBD3 and/or MBD2 expression results in reduced Oct4 repression in differentiated P19 and ES cells. Repression of Oct4 expression and recruitment of MBD3 are maintained in de novo DNA methylation-deficient ES cells (Dnmt3A/3B-null cells), while MBD2 recruitment is lost. Thus, recruitment of MBD3 and MBD2 by GCNF links two events, gene-specific repression and DNA methylation, which occur differentially at the Oct4 promoter. GCNF initiates the repression and epigenetic modification of Oct4 gene during ES cell differentiation.

scholarly journals High-Resolution Dissection of Conducive Reprogramming Trajectory to Ground State Pluripotency

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asaf Zviran ◽  
Nofar Mor ◽  
Yoach Rais ◽  
Hila Gingold ◽  
Shani Peles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Somatic Cells ◽  
Molecular Characteristics ◽  
Chromatin Modifications ◽  
Highly Efficient ◽  
Rare Cells

The ability to reprogram somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with four transcription factors Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and cMyc (abbreviated as OSKM)1 has provoked interest to define the molecular characteristics of this process2-7. Despite important progress, the dynamics of epigenetic reprogramming at high resolution in correctly reprogrammed iPSCs and throughout the entire process remain largely undefined. This gap in understanding results from the inefficiency of conventional reprogramming methods coupled with the difficulty of prospectively isolating the rare cells that eventually correctly reprogram into iPSCs. Here we characterize cell fate conversion from fibroblast to iPSC using a highly efficient deterministic murine reprogramming system engineered through optimized inhibition of Gatad2a-Mbd3/NuRD repressive sub-complex. This comprehensive characterization provides single-day resolution of dynamic changes in levels of gene expression, chromatin modifications, TF binding, DNA accessibility and DNA methylation. The integrative analysis identified two transcriptional modules that dominate successful reprogramming. One consists of genes whose transcription is regulated by on/off epigenetic switching of modifications in their promoters (abbreviated as ESPGs), and the second consists of genes with promoters in a constitutively active chromatin state, but a dynamic expression pattern (abbreviated as CAPGs). ESPGs are mainly regulated by OSK, rather than Myc, and are enriched for cell fate determinants and pluripotency factors. CAPGs are predominantly regulated by Myc, and are enriched for cell biosynthetic regulatory functions. We used the ESPG module to study the identity and temporal occurrence of activating and repressing epigenetic switching during reprogramming. Removal of repressive chromatin modifications precedes chromatin opening and binding of RNA polymerase II at enhancers and promoters, and the opposite dynamics occur during repression of enhancers and promoters. Genome wide DNA methylation analysis demonstrated that de novo DNA methylation is not required for highly efficient conducive iPSC reprogramming, and identified a group of super-enhancers targeted by OSK, whose early demethylation marks commitment to a successful reprogramming trajectory also in inefficient conventional reprogramming systems. CAPGs are distinctively regulated by multiple synergystic ways: 1) Myc activity, delivered either endogenously or exogenously, dominates CAPG expression changes and is indispensable for induction of pluripotency in somatic cells; 2) A change in tRNA codon usage which is specific to CAPGs, but not ESPGs, and favors their translation. In summary, our unbiased high-resolution mapping of epigenetic changes on somatic cells that are committed to undergo successful reprogramming reveals interleaved epigenetic and biosynthetic reconfigurations that rapidly commission and propel conducive reprogramming toward naïve pluripotency.

scholarly journals Copy number-dependent DNA methylation of the Pyricularia oryzae MAGGY retrotransposon is triggered by DNA damage

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ba Van Vu ◽  
Quyet Nguyen ◽  
Yuki Kondo-Takeoka ◽  
Toshiki Murata ◽  
Naoki Kadotani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Rna Silencing ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Pyricularia Oryzae ◽  
Transcriptional Gene Silencing ◽  
Physical Interaction ◽  
Uncharacterized Protein ◽  
Form Complex

AbstractTransposable elements are common targets for transcriptional and post-transcriptional gene silencing in eukaryotic genomes. However, the molecular mechanisms responsible for sensing such repeated sequences in the genome remain largely unknown. Here, we show that machinery of homologous recombination (HR) and RNA silencing play cooperative roles in copy number-dependent de novo DNA methylation of the retrotransposon MAGGY in the fungusPyricularia oryzae. Genetic and physical interaction studies revealed thatRecAdomain-containing proteins, includingP. oryzaehomologs ofRad51, Rad55, andRad57, together with an uncharacterized protein, Ddnm1, form complex(es) and mediate either the overall level or the copy number-dependence of de novo MAGGY DNA methylation, likely in conjunction with DNA repair. Interestingly,P. oryzaemutants of specific RNA silencing components (MoDCL1andMoAGO2)were impaired in copy number-dependence of MAGGY methylation. Co-immunoprecipitation of MoAGO2 and HR components suggested a physical interaction between the HR and RNA silencing machinery in the process.

scholarly journals Interplay between Histone and DNA Methylation Seen through Comparative Methylomes in Rare Mendelian Disorders

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 3735
Author(s):  
Guillaume Velasco ◽  
Damien Ulveling ◽  
Sophie Rondeau ◽  
Pauline Marzin ◽  
Motoko Unoki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Catalytic Domain ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Mutation Screening ◽  
Histone H3 ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Dna Methyltransferases ◽  
Mendelian Disorders ◽  
Epigenetic Machinery

DNA methylation (DNAme) profiling is used to establish specific biomarkers to improve the diagnosis of patients with inherited neurodevelopmental disorders and to guide mutation screening. In the specific case of mendelian disorders of the epigenetic machinery, it also provides the basis to infer mechanistic aspects with regard to DNAme determinants and interplay between histone and DNAme that apply to humans. Here, we present comparative methylomes from patients with mutations in the de novo DNA methyltransferases DNMT3A and DNMT3B, in their catalytic domain or their N-terminal parts involved in reading histone methylation, or in histone H3 lysine (K) methylases NSD1 or SETD2 (H3 K36) or KMT2D/MLL2 (H3 K4). We provide disease-specific DNAme signatures and document the distinct consequences of mutations in enzymes with very similar or intertwined functions, including at repeated sequences and imprinted loci. We found that KMT2D and SETD2 germline mutations have little impact on DNAme profiles. In contrast, the overlapping DNAme alterations downstream of NSD1 or DNMT3 mutations underlines functional links, more specifically between NSD1 and DNMT3B at heterochromatin regions or DNMT3A at regulatory elements. Together, these data indicate certain discrepancy with the mechanisms described in animal models or the existence of redundant or complementary functions unforeseen in humans.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document