Lattice symmetry breaking transition and critical size limit for ferroic orders in nanophase BiFeO3

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeri Petkov ◽  
Sarvjit Shastri
2018 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryosuke Takehara ◽  
Keishi Sunami ◽  
Fumitatsu Iwase ◽  
Masayuki Hosoda ◽  
Kazuya Miyagawa ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. e0199418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry D. Beacham ◽  
H. Andres Araujo ◽  
Strahan Tucker ◽  
Marc Trudel

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Tonegawa ◽  
S. Kasahara ◽  
T. Fukuda ◽  
K. Sugimoto ◽  
N. Yasuda ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1694-1715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Charette ◽  
Victor G. LeBlanc

Nano Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 837-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory P. Howard ◽  
Garima Verma ◽  
Xiyu Ke ◽  
Winter M. Thayer ◽  
Timothy Hamerly ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (07) ◽  
pp. 1443-1456 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. KOROVER ◽  
E. I. GUENDELMAN

In this paper the consequences of introducing spontaneous symmetry breaking of scale invariance through a scale that is obtained from the integration of the equations of motion of four index field strengths are studied. Confinement is obtained for all values of this constant of integration. For negative values two point charges have a potential energy that grows linearly with distance, but they can be arbitrarily far apart (although this is costly from the point of view of energy). For positive values of the integration constant, there is no possibility of separating charges too far apart; at a certain point a new charge of opposite sign has to be added to form a neutral system that cannot be bigger that a critical size. We discuss this using different methods, including some developed by Adler and Piran. In addition, we discuss a few alternative effective actions that are similar and that also give confinement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document