Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Singularities

1965 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 57-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Penrose
2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 1977-1984 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. D. PATIL ◽  
U. S. THOOL

In the present work, we investigate the influence of the monopole field on the occurrence of the space–time singularities in the gravitational collapse of anti-de Sitter–Vaidya space–time. It has been found that the spherically symmetric monopole-anti-de Sitter–Vaidya space–time contradicts the CCH, whereas the non-spherical collapse respects it.


1974 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 82-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Penrose

In the standard picture of gravitational collapse to a black hole, a key role is played by the hypothesis of cosmic censorship – according to which no naked space-time singularities can result from any collapse. A precise definition of a naked singularity is given here which leads to a strong ‘local’ version of the cosmic censorship hypothesis. This is equivalent to the proposition that a Cauchy hypersurface exits for the space-time. The principle that the surface area of a black hole can never decrease with time is presented in a new and simplified form which generalizes the earlier statements. A discussion of the relevance of recent work to the naked singularity problem is also given.


A new theorem on space-time singularities is presented which largely incorporates and generalizes the previously known results. The theorem implies that space-time singularities are to be expected if either the universe is spatially closed or there is an ‘object’ undergoing relativistic gravitational collapse (existence of a trapped surface) or there is a point p whose past null cone encounters sufficient matter that the divergence of the null rays through p changes sign somewhere to the past of p (i. e. there is a minimum apparent solid angle, as viewed from p for small objects of given size). The theorem applies if the following four physical assumptions are made: (i) Einstein’s equations hold (with zero or negative cosmological constant), (ii) the energy density is nowhere less than minus each principal pressure nor less than minus the sum of the three principal pressures (the ‘energy condition’), (iii) there are no closed timelike curves, (iv) every timelike or null geodesic enters a region where the curvature is not specially alined with the geodesic. (This last condition would hold in any sufficiently general physically realistic model.) In common with earlier results, timelike or null geodesic incompleteness is used here as the indication of the presence of space-time singularities. No assumption concerning existence of a global Cauchy hypersurface is required for the present theorem.


1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (38) ◽  
pp. 3069-3072
Author(s):  
L. C. GARCIA DE ANDRADE

Negative energy densities in spinning matter sources of non-Riemannian ultrastatic traversable wormholes require the spin energy density to be higher than the negative pressure or the radial tension. Since the radial tension necessary to support wormholes is higher than the spin density in practice, it seems very unlikely that wormholes supported by torsion may exist in nature. This result corroborates earlier results by Soleng against the construction of the closed time-like curves (CTC) in space–time geometries with spin and torsion. It also agrees with earlier results by Kerlick according to which Einstein–Cartan (EC) gravity torsion sometimes enhance the gravitational collapse instead of avoiding it.


2012 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 2503-2520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranjan Sharma ◽  
Ramesh Tikekar

2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (26) ◽  
pp. 4797-4809 ◽  
Author(s):  
NORMA G. SANCHEZ

Key issues and essential features of classical and quantum strings in gravitational plane waves, shock waves and space–time singularities are synthetically understood. This includes the string mass and mode number excitations, energy–momentum tensor, scattering amplitudes, vacuum polarization and wave-string polarization effect. The role of the real pole singularities characteristic of the tree level string spectrum (real mass resonances) and that of the space–time singularities is clearly exhibited. This throws light on the issue of singularities in string theory which can be thus classified and fully physically characterized in two different sets: strong singularities (poles of order ≥ 2, and black holes) where the string motion is collective and nonoscillating in time, outgoing states and scattering sector do not appear, the string does not cross the singularities; and weak singularities (poles of order < 2, (Dirac δ belongs to this class) and conic/orbifold singularities) where the whole string motion is oscillatory in time, outgoing and scattering states exist, and the string crosses the singularities. Common features of strings in singular wave backgrounds and in inflationary backgrounds are explicitly exhibited. The string dynamics and the scattering/excitation through the singularities (whatever their kind: strong or weak) is fully physically consistent and meaningful.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (14) ◽  
pp. 2030007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen Chin Ong

The singularity theorems of Hawking and Penrose tell us that singularities are common place in general relativity. Singularities not only occur at the beginning of the Universe at the Big Bang, but also in complete gravitational collapses that result in the formation of black holes. If singularities — except the one at the Big Bang — ever become “naked,” i.e. not shrouded by black hole horizons, then it is expected that problems would arise and render general relativity indeterministic. For this reason, Penrose proposed the cosmic censorship conjecture, which states that singularities should never be naked. Various counterexamples to the conjecture have since been discovered, but it is still not clear under which kind of physical processes one can expect violation of the conjecture. In this short review, I briefly examine some progresses in space–time singularities and cosmic censorship conjecture. In particular, I shall discuss why we should still care about the conjecture, and whether we should be worried about some of the counterexamples. This is not meant to be a comprehensive review, but rather to give an introduction to the subject, which has recently seen an increase of interest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document