Quantitative analysis of the polymorphic content of chloramphenicol palmitate by X-ray powder diffraction

1984 ◽  
Vol 40 (a1) ◽  
pp. C366-C366
Author(s):  
W. H. De Camp
Clay Minerals ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 393-399
Author(s):  
C. E. Corbato ◽  
R. T. Tettenhorst

AbstractQuantitative estimates were made by visually matching computer-simulated with experimental X-ray powder diffractometer patterns for two samples. One was a natural mixture of dickite and nacrite in about equal proportions. The second sample contained mostly quartz with corundum and mullite in small (0.5–1%) amounts. Percentages deduced from pattern matching agreed to within ±10% of the weight fractions of the components determined by an alternative method of analysis.


2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 985-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Riello ◽  
M. Munarin ◽  
S. Silvestrini ◽  
E. Moretti ◽  
L. Storaro

Quantification of individual phases within a multiphase amorphous material has been achieved using a newly developed technique based on X-ray powder diffraction. The quantification method was developed during a study of an amorphous silica–poly(methyl methacrylate) (SiO2–PMMA) hybrid nanocomposite. The efficiency of the method as a quantifying tool for individual phases was demonstrated for samples of SiO2–PMMA prepared either by polymerization of methyl methacrylate in the presence of amorphous SiO2or by mechanically mixing known quantities of the individual and pre-prepared SiO2and PMMA materials. The weight percentages of amorphous SiO2in the nanocomposites as determined by application of the new technique were analogously found to be 29%, a result that was supported by thermogravimetric analysis and helium picnometry measurements.


Crystals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanko Popović

X-ray powder diffraction is an ideal technique for the quantitative analysis of a multiphase sample. The intensities of diffraction lines of a phase in a multiphase sample are proportional to the phase fraction and the quantitative analysis can be obtained if the correction for the absorption of X-rays in the sample is performed. Simple procedures of quantitative X-ray diffraction phase analysis of a multiphase sample are presented. The matrix-flushing method, with the application of reference intensities, yields the relationship between the intensity and phase fraction free from the absorption effect, thus, shunting calibration curves or internal standard procedures. Special attention is paid to the doping methods: (i) simultaneous determination of the fractions of several phases using a single doping and (ii) determination of the fraction of the dominant phase. The conditions to minimize systematic errors are discussed. The problem of overlapping of diffraction lines can be overcome by combining the doping method (i) and the individual profile fitting method, thus performing the quantitative phase analysis without the reference to structural models of particular phases. Recent suggestions in quantitative phase analysis are quoted, e.g., in study of the decomposition of supersaturated solid solutions—intermetallic alloys. Round Robin on Quantitative Phase Analysis, organized by the IUCr Commission on Powder Diffraction, is discussed shortly. The doping methods have been applied in various studies, e.g., phase transitions in titanium dioxide, biomineralization processes, and phases in intermetallic oxide systems and intermetallic alloys.


1993 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. W. Tomlin ◽  
D. B. Sullenger ◽  
J. S. Cantrell

An X-ray powder diffraction quantitative analysis has been developed to determine the relative amounts of the principal crystalline phases (α-Li2SiO3,α-Li2Si2O5and theα-cristobalite form of SiO2) contained in selected Li2O–SiO2glass-ceramics. The analysis was extended to estimate the amorphous-to-crystalline content ratio of individual samples. The method utilized is an external-standard intensity ratio technique that employs cristobalite, a component common to each sample, for a standard.


The Analyst ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos G. Kontoyannis ◽  
Malvina G. Orkoula ◽  
Petros G. Koutsoukos

1991 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 619-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian C. Madsen ◽  
Russell J. Finney ◽  
Robert C. A. Flann ◽  
Malcolm T. Frost ◽  
Bill W. Wilson

Author(s):  
W. A. Mitchell

SummaryA method of quantitative analysis by photometry of X-ray powder diffraction patterns is described. Co-Kα radiation is used and absorption difficulties are overcome by using thin diluted specimens containing an internal standard. An arbitrary universal intensity scale has been established and the values for the stronger lines of a number of minerals are given. Within individual patterns these are consistent with published data obtained by counter diffractometry.


1988 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camden R. Hubbard ◽  
Robert L. Snyder

AbstractThe Reference Intensity Ratio (RIR) is a general, instrument-independent constant for use in quantitative phase analysis by the X-ray powder diffraction internal standard method. When the reference standard is corundum, RIR is known as I/Ic; These constants are collected in the Powder Diffraction File (1987), can be calculated, and can be measured. Recommended methods for accurate measurement of RIR constants are presented, and methods of using these constants for quantitative analysis are discussed. The numerous, complex constants in Copeland and Bragg's method introduced to account for superimposed lines can be simply expressed in terms of RIR constants and relative intensities. This formalism also permits introduction of constraints and supplemental equations based on elemental analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document