Prioritization of Multi-level Risk Factors, and Predicting Changes in Depression Ratings after Treatment Using Multi-Task Learning

Author(s):  
Lu Wang ◽  
Mark Chignell ◽  
Haoyan Jiang ◽  
Sachinthya Lokuge ◽  
Geneva Mason ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 919-921 ◽  
pp. 878-882
Author(s):  
Shi Mei Bai ◽  
Hong Sheng Sun ◽  
Yong Chun Zhao

In this context, firstly, the safety evaluation index system of subway operation is established on the basis of the recognition and analysis of risk factors. Then, the paper constructs the multi-level extensible evaluation model for subway operation safety with the extension method as the core. Finally, Beijing Changping subway is studied as an example. The risk degrees of the line and its subsystems are determined. A new method for comprehensive evaluation of subway operation safety in china is put forward.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi-Wen Fan ◽  
Zhi-Wei Wang ◽  
Xian-Da Gao ◽  
Wen-Yuan Ding ◽  
Da-Long Yang

Abstract Background Cervical sagittal parameters were closely related with clinical outcomes after multi-level ACDF. Our purpose was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and cervical sagittal parameters in patients with MCSM after ACDF and to identify the risk factors of poor clinical outcomes. Material and methods ACDF was performed in 89 patients with MCSM. Based on average JOA recovery rate, patients were divided good-outcome group (group GO) and poor-outcome group (group PO). The cervical sagittal parameters including Cobb angle, SVA, T1S, cranial tilt and cervical tilt were measured. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors. Results Fifty-four patients (60.67%) were divided into group GO, while 35 patients (39.33%) were divided into group PO. Cobb angle, SVA and T1S was corrected from preoperative average 11.80° ± 9.63°, 23.69 mm ± 11.69 mm and 24.43° ± 11.78° to postoperative average 15.08° ± 9.05°, 18.79 mm ± 10.78 mm and 26.92° ± 11.94° respectively (p < 0.001). △Cobb angle (p = 0.008) and △SVA (p = 0.009) showed significantly statistical differences between two groups. Longer symptom duration, lower preoperative JOA score, smaller △Cobb angle and larger △SVA were identified as risk factors of poor clinical outcomes. Conclusion Multi-level ACDF is an effective surgical method to treat patients with MCSM. However, long duration of preoperative symptoms, lower preoperative JOA score, smaller △Cobb angle and larger △SVA are risk factors for poor outcomes in patients with MCSM after ACDF. Sagittal parameters should be paid attention to in surgery.


1998 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 1841-1854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald W. Matteson ◽  
Jeffrey A. Burr ◽  
James R. Marshall

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document