Selecting and combining biomarkers by gene expression profiles for colon cancer classification

Author(s):  
Meng Pan ◽  
Jie Zhang
Author(s):  
Bong-Hyun Kim ◽  
Kijin Yu ◽  
Peter C W Lee

Abstract Motivation Cancer classification based on gene expression profiles has provided insight on the causes of cancer and cancer treatment. Recently, machine learning-based approaches have been attempted in downstream cancer analysis to address the large differences in gene expression values, as determined by single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Results We designed cancer classifiers that can identify 21 types of cancers and normal tissues based on bulk RNA-seq as well as scRNA-seq data. Training was performed with 7398 cancer samples and 640 normal samples from 21 tumors and normal tissues in TCGA based on the 300 most significant genes expressed in each cancer. Then, we compared neural network (NN), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (kNN) and random forest (RF) methods. The NN performed consistently better than other methods. We further applied our approach to scRNA-seq transformed by kNN smoothing and found that our model successfully classified cancer types and normal samples. Availability and implementation Cancer classification by neural network. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (S7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Wen ◽  
Benika Hall ◽  
Xinghua Shi

Abstract Background Colon cancer is one of the common cancers in human. Although the number of annual cases has decreased drastically, prognostic screening and translational methods can be improved. Hence, it is critical to understand the molecular mechanisms of disease progression and prognosis. Results In this study, we develop a new strategy for integrating microRNA and gene expression profiles together with clinical information toward understanding the regulation of colon cancer. Particularly, we use this approach to identify microRNA and gene expression networks that are specific to certain pathological stages. To demonstrate the application of our method, we apply this approach to identify microRNA and gene interactions that are specific to pathological stages of colon cancer in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets. Conclusions Our results show that there are significant differences in network connections between miRNAs and genes in different pathological stages of colon cancer. These findings point to a hypothesis that these networks signify different roles of microRNA and gene regulation in the pathogenesis and tumorigenesis of colon cancer.


2015 ◽  
Vol 316 ◽  
pp. 293-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thanh Nguyen ◽  
Abbas Khosravi ◽  
Douglas Creighton ◽  
Saeid Nahavandi

2003 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. A239
Author(s):  
Petar Novakovic ◽  
Kyoung-Jin Sohn ◽  
Young-In J. Kim

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 21042-21042
Author(s):  
M. T. Schreeder ◽  
R. S. Seitz ◽  
R. Beck ◽  
B. Z. Ring ◽  
D. T. Ross

21042 Introduction: Pathologic stage is the most powerful predictor of outcome in colorectal cancer. However, in early stage disease there continues to be a need for better identification of patients at high risk of disease progression after surgical resection. We have undertaken a large scale effort translating gene expression profiles into immunohistochemical biomarkers that classify carcinoma in novel ways. Herein we report the identification of a colorectal tailored antibody “panel of diversity” that distinguishes tumor heterogeneity and propose a multivariate index assay (MIA) for predicting outcome. Methods: 744 stage I-III consecutive colon cancer patients treated by the CCIH between 1992 and 2000 were identified. Clinical followup through 2005 was obtained from the tumor registry and verified by chart review . Tissue micorarrays (TMA) were constructed from these patients resected primary tumors. Over 700 antibodies targeted by carcinoma gene expression experiments or literature review were first screened on a 30 case TMA. Of these, 34 were selected as showing subjectively high quality stains and the ability to classify patient populations. These antibodies were used to stain the clinical TMA and scored using a semi-quantitative scale. We used a number of approaches including Cox, RPART, and Bayesian to derive candidate MIA's to predict recurrence. Results: 13 antibodies showed a significant or near significant association with either overall recurrence or recurrence at 5 years. We have previously shown these antibodies to have similar prognostic abilities in other solid tumor carcinomas. We propose a model combining nine markers (p53, CCNA2, TFF3, RERG, AKR1C1, TLE3, IRX3, SYP, TTC7) as an MIA for predicting outcome in Stage II patients. The model is independent of pathologic stage. Conclusions: This colon tailored antibody ‘panel of diversity’ is a tool for characterizing the biologic diversity in colon cancer cohorts. The identification of nine prognostic markers that can be effectively combined using an MIA suggests that combination of multiple markers will be useful for developing sensitive and specific prognostic assays. The model proposed herein should be validated using additional cohorts to evaluate its overall clinical utility. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document