scholarly journals New Ensemble Machine Learning Method for Classification and Prediction on Gene Expression Data

Author(s):  
Ching Wei Wang
Author(s):  
Ching Wei Wang

One of the most active areas of research in supervised machine learning has been to study methods for constructing good ensembles of classifiers. The main discovery is that the ensemble classifier often performs much better than single classifiers that make them up. Recent researches (Dettling, 2004, Tan & Gilbert, 2003) have confirmed the utility of ensemble machine learning algorithms for gene expression analysis. The motivation of this work is to investigate a suitable machine learning algorithm for classification and prediction on gene expression data. The research starts with analyzing the behavior and weaknesses of three popular ensemble machine learning methods—Bagging, Boosting, and Arcing—followed by presentation of a new ensemble machine learning algorithm. The proposed method is evaluated with the existing ensemble machine learning algorithms over 12 gene expression datasets (Alon et al., 1999; Armstrong et al., 2002; Ash et al., 2000; Catherine et al., 2003; Dinesh et al., 2002; Gavin et al., 2002; Golub et al., 1999; Scott et al., 2002; van ’t Veer et al., 2002; Yeoh et al., 2002; Zembutsu et al., 2002). The experimental results show that the proposed algorithm greatly outperforms existing methods, achieving high accuracy in classification. The outline of this chapter is as follows: Ensemble machine learning approach and three popular ensembles (i.e., Bagging, Boosting, and Arcing) are introduced first in the Background section; second, the analyses on existing ensembles, details of the proposed algorithm, and experimental results are presented in Method section, followed by discussions on the future trends and conclusion.


Cell Cycle ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 486-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Borisov ◽  
Victor Tkachev ◽  
Maria Suntsova ◽  
Olga Kovalchuk ◽  
Alex Zhavoronkov ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (18) ◽  
pp. 11118-11126
Author(s):  
Xingcheng Lu ◽  
Dehao Yuan ◽  
Yiang Chen ◽  
Jimmy C.H. Fung ◽  
Wenkai Li ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 4016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xudong Hu ◽  
Han Zhang ◽  
Hongbo Mei ◽  
Dunhui Xiao ◽  
Yuanyuan Li ◽  
...  

Landslide susceptibility mapping is considered to be a prerequisite for landslide prevention and mitigation. However, delineating the spatial occurrence pattern of the landslide remains a challenge. This study investigates the potential application of the stacking ensemble learning technique for landslide susceptibility assessment. In particular, support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), logical regression (LR), and naive Bayes (NB) were selected as base learners for the stacking ensemble method. The resampling scheme and Pearson’s correlation analysis were jointly used to evaluate the importance level of these base learners. A total of 388 landslides and 12 conditioning factors in the Lushui area (Southwest China) were used as the dataset to develop landslide modeling. The landslides were randomly separated into two parts, with 70% used for model training and 30% used for model validation. The models’ performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and statistical measures. The results showed that the stacking-based ensemble model achieved an improved predictive accuracy as compared to the single algorithms, while the SVM-ANN-NB-LR (SANL) model, the SVM-ANN-NB (SAN) model, and the ANN-NB-LR (ANL) models performed equally well, with AUC values of 0.931, 0.940, and 0.932, respectively, for validation stage. The correlation coefficient between the LR and SVM was the highest for all resampling rounds, with a value of 0.72 on average. This connotes that LR and SVM played an almost equal role when the ensemble of SANL was applied for landslide susceptibility analysis. Therefore, it is feasible to use the SAN model or the ANL model for the study area. The finding from this study suggests that the stacking ensemble machine learning method is promising for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Lushui area and is capable of targeting areas prone to landslides.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (S14) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan A. Clayton ◽  
Toyya A. Pujol ◽  
John F. McDonald ◽  
Peng Qiu

Abstract Background Machine learning has been utilized to predict cancer drug response from multi-omics data generated from sensitivities of cancer cell lines to different therapeutic compounds. Here, we build machine learning models using gene expression data from patients’ primary tumor tissues to predict whether a patient will respond positively or negatively to two chemotherapeutics: 5-Fluorouracil and Gemcitabine. Results We focused on 5-Fluorouracil and Gemcitabine because based on our exclusion criteria, they provide the largest numbers of patients within TCGA. Normalized gene expression data were clustered and used as the input features for the study. We used matching clinical trial data to ascertain the response of these patients via multiple classification methods. Multiple clustering and classification methods were compared for prediction accuracy of drug response. Clara and random forest were found to be the best clustering and classification methods, respectively. The results show our models predict with up to 86% accuracy; despite the study’s limitation of sample size. We also found the genes most informative for predicting drug response were enriched in well-known cancer signaling pathways and highlighted their potential significance in chemotherapy prognosis. Conclusions Primary tumor gene expression is a good predictor of cancer drug response. Investment in larger datasets containing both patient gene expression and drug response is needed to support future work of machine learning models. Ultimately, such predictive models may aid oncologists with making critical treatment decisions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. e1006826 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G. P. van IJzendoorn ◽  
Karoly Szuhai ◽  
Inge H. Briaire-de Bruijn ◽  
Marie Kostine ◽  
Marieke L. Kuijjer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document