scholarly journals Real-Time Latching Control of Wave Energy Converter with Consideration of Wave Force Prediction

Author(s):  
Liang Li ◽  
Yan Gao ◽  
Zhiming Yuan
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1444
Author(s):  
Dan Yu ◽  
Keyi Wang ◽  
Yeqing Jin ◽  
Fankai Kong ◽  
Hailong Chen ◽  
...  

In this work, the hydrodynamic performance of a novel wave energy converter (WEC) configuration which combines a moonpool platform and a javelin floating buoy, called the moonpool–javelin wave energy converter (MJWEC), was studied by semianalytical, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and experimental methods. The viscous term is added to the potential flow solver to obtain the hydrodynamic coefficients. The wave force, the added mass, the radiation damping, the wave capture, and the energy efficiency of the configuration were assessed, in the frequency and time domains, by a semianalytical method. The CFD method results and the semianalytical results were compared for the time domain by introducing nonlinear power take-off (PTO) damping; additionally, the viscous dissipation coefficients under potential flow could be confirmed. Finally, a 1:10 scale model was physically tested to validate the numerical model and further prove the feasibility of the proposed system.


Energies ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 3036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Thomas ◽  
Mikael Eriksson ◽  
Malin Göteman ◽  
Martyn Hann ◽  
Jan Isberg ◽  
...  

A challenge while applying latching control on a wave energy converter (WEC) is to find a reliable and robust control strategy working in irregular waves and handling the non-ideal behavior of real WECs. In this paper, a robust and model-free collaborative learning approach for latchable WECs in an array is presented. A machine learning algorithm with a shallow artificial neural network (ANN) is used to find optimal latching times. The applied strategy is compared to a latching time that is linearly correlated with the mean wave period: It is remarkable that the ANN-based WEC achieved a similar power absorption as the WEC applying a linear latching time, by applying only two different latching times. The strategy was tested in a numerical simulation, where for some sea states it absorbed more than twice the power compared to the uncontrolled WEC and over 30% more power than a WEC with constant latching. In wave tank tests with a 1:10 physical scale model the advantage decreased to +3% compared to the best tested constant latching WEC, which is explained by the lower advantage of the latching strategy caused by the non-ideal latching of the physical power take-off model.


2021 ◽  
Vol 236 ◽  
pp. 109512
Author(s):  
Changhai Liu ◽  
Min Hu ◽  
Zhixue Zhao ◽  
Yishan Zeng ◽  
Wenzhi Gao ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 229-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.C.C. Henriques ◽  
L.M.C. Gato ◽  
A.F.O. Falcão ◽  
E. Robles ◽  
F.-X. Faÿ

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document