scholarly journals DSP-Based Dual-Polarity Mass Spectrum Pattern Recognition for Bio-Detection

Author(s):  
V. Riot ◽  
K. Coffee ◽  
E. Gard ◽  
D. Fergenson ◽  
S. Ramani ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenfa Ng

Pattern recognition is commonly used for identifying an unknown entity from a set of known objects curated in a database, and find use in various applications such as fingerprint matching and microbial identification. Mass spectrometry is increasingly used in identifying microbes in the research and clinical settings via species- or strain-specific mass spectrum signatures. Although the existence of unique biomarkers (such as ribosomal proteins) underpins mass spectrometry-based microbial identification, absence of corresponding genome or proteome information in public databases for a large fraction of extant microbes significantly hamper biomarker (and species) assignment. However, the reproducible generation of species-specific mass spectrum across different growth and environmental conditions opens up the possibility of identifying unknown microbes, without biomarker identities, via comparing peak positions between mass spectra. Thus, the mass spectrum fingerprinting (pattern recognition) approach circumvents the need for biomarker information, where alignment of as many mass peaks as possible (particularly, those of phylogenetic significance) between spectra is the basis for identification. In contrast, variation in gene expression and metabolism with environmental and nutritional factors, meant that alignment of peak intensities, though desired, is not a strict requirement in species annotation. With large diversity of biomolecules present in each microbial species, mass spectrometry-based microbial identification is inherently data-intensive, which necessitates statistical tools and computers for implementation. However, relegation of algorithmic details to the backend of software obfuscates the approach’s conceptual underpinnings and hinders understanding. More importantly, mathematics-centric approaches for explaining the conceptual basis of pattern recognition, though useful, are generally less pedagogically accessible to students relative to visual illustration techniques. This short primer describes a simple graphical illustration that explains the conceptual underpinnings of mass spectrum fingerprinting, and highlights caveats for avoiding misidentifications, and may find use as a supplement in a microbiology or bioinformatics course for introducing the conceptual basis of pattern recognition based microbial identification by mass spectrometric analysis.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenfa Ng

Pattern recognition is a common approach for identifying an unknown entity from a set of known objects curated in a database – and find use in various data processing applications such as microbial identification. Whether matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) or electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI MS/MS), mass spectrometry techniques are increasingly used for identifying microbes in the research and clinical settings via species- or strain-specific mass spectrum signatures. Although the existence of unique biomarkers - such as ribosomal proteins - underpins mass spectrometry-enabled microbial identification, lack of corresponding genome or proteome information in publicly accessible databases for a large fraction of extant microbes significantly hamper biomarker (and species) assignment. Nevertheless, the reproducible generation of species-specific mass spectrum across different growth and environmental conditions opens up the possibility of identifying unknown microbes via comparing peak positions between mass spectra, without requiring knowledge of biomarker molecular identities. Thus, the mass spectrum fingerprinting (or pattern recognition) approach circumvents the need for biomarker information. Alignment of as many mass peaks as possible (particularly, those of phylogenetic significance) between spectra is the basis of mass spectrum fingerprinting. In contrast, variation in gene expression and metabolism (and hence, biomolecules’ abundances) with environmental and nutritional factors, meant that alignment of peak intensities, though desired, is not a strict requirement for identification. With large diversity of biomolecules present in each microbial species, mass spectrometry-based microbial identification is inherently data-intensive; thereby, requiring statistical tools and computational implementation of the pattern recognition approach, which is incorporated in software packages of microbial typing instruments. Nevertheless, relegation of algorithmic details of pattern recognition to the backend of software obfuscates the approach’s conceptual underpinnings and hinders students’ understanding. More important, mathematics-centric approaches for explaining the conceptual basis of pattern recognition, though useful, are generally less pedagogically accessible to life science students relative to visual illustration techniques. This short primer describes a simple graphical illustration (featuring three examples common in mass spectrometry-based biotyping workflows) that attempts to explain the conceptual underpinnings of mass spectrum fingerprinting, and highlights caveats for avoiding misidentification.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenfa Ng

Pattern recognition is commonly used for identifying an unknown entity from a set of known objects curated in a database – and find use in various applications such as fingerprint matching and microbial identification. Whether matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) or electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI MS/MS), mass spectrometry is increasingly used in identifying microbes in the research and clinical settings via species- or strain-specific mass spectrum signatures. Although the existence of unique biomarkers - such as ribosomal proteins - underpins mass spectrometry-based microbial identification, absence of corresponding genome or proteome information in publicly accessible databases for a large fraction of extant microbes significantly hamper biomarker (and species) assignment. Nevertheless, the reproducible generation of species-specific mass spectrum across different growth and environmental conditions opens up the possibility of identifying unknown microbes via comparing peak positions between mass spectra, without biomarker identities. Thus, the mass spectrum fingerprinting (pattern recognition) approach circumvents the need for biomarker information, where alignment of as many mass peaks as possible (particularly, those of phylogenetic significance) between spectra is the basis for identification. In contrast, variation in gene expression and metabolism (and biomolecules’ abundances) with environmental and nutritional factors, meant that alignment of peak intensities, though desired, is not a strict requirement in species annotation. With large diversity of biomolecules present in each microbial species, mass spectrometry-based microbial identification is inherently data-intensive, which requires statistical tools and computers for implementing pattern recognition. Nevertheless, relegation of algorithmic details to the backend of software obfuscates the approach’s conceptual underpinnings and hinders students’ understanding. More important, mathematics-centric approaches for explaining the conceptual basis of pattern recognition, though useful, are generally less pedagogically accessible to students relative to visual illustration techniques. This short primer describes a simple graphical illustration (featuring three examples common in mass spectrometry-based biotyping workflows) that attempts to explain the conceptual underpinnings of mass spectrum fingerprinting, and highlights caveats for avoiding misidentifications.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenfa Ng

Pattern recognition is commonly used for identifying an unknown entity from a set of known objects curated in a database, and find use in various applications such as fingerprint matching and microbial identification. Mass spectrometry is increasingly used in identifying microbes in the research and clinical settings via species- or strain-specific mass spectrum signatures. Although the existence of unique biomarkers (such as ribosomal proteins) underpins mass spectrometry-based microbial identification, absence of corresponding genome or proteome information in public databases for a large fraction of extant microbes significantly hamper biomarker (and species) assignment. However, the reproducible generation of species-specific mass spectrum across different growth and environmental conditions opens up the possibility of identifying unknown microbes, without biomarker identities, via comparing peak positions between mass spectra. Thus, the mass spectrum fingerprinting (pattern recognition) approach circumvents the need for biomarker information, where alignment of as many mass peaks as possible (particularly, those of phylogenetic significance) between spectra is the basis for identification. In contrast, variation in gene expression and metabolism with environmental and nutritional factors, meant that alignment of peak intensities, though desired, is not a strict requirement in species annotation. With large diversity of biomolecules present in each microbial species, mass spectrometry-based microbial identification is inherently data-intensive, which necessitates statistical tools and computers for implementation. However, relegation of algorithmic details to the backend of software obfuscates the approach’s conceptual underpinnings and hinders understanding. More importantly, mathematics-centric approaches for explaining the conceptual basis of pattern recognition, though useful, are generally less pedagogically accessible to students relative to visual illustration techniques. This short primer describes a simple graphical illustration that explains the conceptual underpinnings of mass spectrum fingerprinting, and highlights caveats for avoiding misidentifications, and may find use as a supplement in a microbiology or bioinformatics course for introducing the conceptual basis of pattern recognition based microbial identification by mass spectrometric analysis.


Author(s):  
G.Y. Fan ◽  
J.M. Cowley

In recent developments, the ASU HB5 has been modified so that the timing, positioning, and scanning of the finely focused electron probe can be entirely controlled by a host computer. This made the asynchronized handshake possible between the HB5 STEM and the image processing system which consists of host computer (PDP 11/34), DeAnza image processor (IP 5000) which is interfaced with a low-light level TV camera, array processor (AP 400) and various peripheral devices. This greatly facilitates the pattern recognition technique initiated by Monosmith and Cowley. Software called NANHB5 is under development which, instead of employing a set of photo-diodes to detect strong spots on a TV screen, uses various software techniques including on-line fast Fourier transform (FFT) to recognize patterns of greater complexity, taking advantage of the sophistication of our image processing system and the flexibility of computer software.


Author(s):  
L. Fei ◽  
P. Fraundorf

Interface structure is of major interest in microscopy. With high resolution transmission electron microscopes (TEMs) and scanning probe microscopes, it is possible to reveal structure of interfaces in unit cells, in some cases with atomic resolution. A. Ourmazd et al. proposed quantifying such observations by using vector pattern recognition to map chemical composition changes across the interface in TEM images with unit cell resolution. The sensitivity of the mapping process, however, is limited by the repeatability of unit cell images of perfect crystal, and hence by the amount of delocalized noise, e.g. due to ion milling or beam radiation damage. Bayesian removal of noise, based on statistical inference, can be used to reduce the amount of non-periodic noise in images after acquisition. The basic principle of Bayesian phase-model background subtraction, according to our previous study, is that the optimum (rms error minimizing strategy) Fourier phases of the noise can be obtained provided the amplitudes of the noise is given, while the noise amplitude can often be estimated from the image itself.


1989 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 988-989
Author(s):  
Erwin M. Segal
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document