Quality-driven validation: a link between four research traditions

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Tervonen
Keyword(s):  
Research Traditions

Structure, Logic, and Semantics in ad hoc Classification Schemes Applied to Web-Based Libraries in the Field of Education

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michèle Hudon ◽  
Sabine Mas ◽  
Dominique Gazo
Keyword(s):  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Knowledge Organization ◽  
Theoretical Research ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Classification Schemes ◽  
Research Traditions ◽  
Local Perspectives

This project focuses on a sample of six Web-based libraries in the field of Education. Our analysis explores structural, logic and semantic dimensions, supported by theoretical research in classification and in the area of personal document spaces organization, and by findings of previous analyses of Web directory structures. Our findings expand our understanding of how Web-based resources in education are organized, helping us determine whether categorization schemes and keywords reflect anything else than local perspectives and systems, while bringing together two research traditions issued respectively from knowledge organization and from document and records management.Ce projet est axé sur un échantillon de six bibliothèques sur le Web dans le domaine de l’éducation. Notre analyse explore les dimensions structurelles, logiques et sémantiques, corroborée par la recherche théorique en classification et dans le domaine de l’organisation des espaces documentaires personnels, et par les résultats d’analyses préliminaires de la structure des répertoires Web. Nos résultats développent notre compréhension sur la manière dont les ressources Web en éducation sont organisées, nous aidant ainsi à déterminer… 

Unscrambling method and methodology in action research traditions: theoretical conceptualization of praxis and emancipation

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana Cordeiro ◽  
Cassia Baldini Soares ◽  
Leslie Rittenmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Participatory Approach ◽  
Knowledge Generation ◽  
Research Traditions ◽  
Self Reflection ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Theoretical Conceptualization

Action research is a participatory approach that is used in an array of contexts. From its first proposition it comprises four core principles: participation and collaboration; a constant spiral cycle of self-reflection; knowledge generation; and practice transformation. Praxis and emancipation are two important analytical categories in AR, but are conceptualized differently in the two existing AR traditions. These conceptualizations reveal different AR aims, which lead to either the use of AR as a method (Northern tradition) or as a methodology (Southern tradition). Much depends on the researchers’ interest and worldview. Our objective in this paper is to compare how emancipation and praxis are theorized in both traditions. This discussion intends to add insight into the methodological understanding and utilization of AR.

Re-Conceptualizing Solitude in the Digital Era: From “Being Alone” to “Noncommunication”

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott W Campbell ◽  
Morgan Q Ross
Keyword(s):  
Contextual Factors ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Mobile Media ◽  
Previous Theory ◽  
Research Traditions ◽  
Digital Era

Abstract This article revisits the theoretical terrain surrounding solitude to address conceptual, methodological, and practical challenges manifest in the digital era. First, solitude has been approached from a number of different research traditions, resulting in disconnected streams of theory. Furthermore, these streams were developed before the rise of the Internet and mobile media. As a result, solitude is commonly, if not most commonly, conceptualized and measured as a matter of being physically alone. This article re-conceptualizes solitude as “noncommunication” to offer a more contemporary and inclusive perspective, one that uproots it from ideations of physical aloneness and replants it in social aloneness. Whereas previous theory in this area often ignores mediated interaction, we recognize it as a meaningful way for people to connect, with important implications for solitude. Our framework also calls for interrogation of key contextual factors that condition whether and how solitude is experienced in the digital era.

Studying Resource-Dependent Communities Through a Social-Ecological Lens? Examining Complementarity with Existing Research Traditions in Canada

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Teitelbaum ◽  
Annie Montpetit ◽  
Jean-François Bissonnette ◽  
Clément Chion ◽  
Guy Chiasson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Traditions ◽  
Social Ecological

scholarly journals Vulnerability Concepts and its Application in Various Fields: A Review on Geographical Perspective

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 63-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shitangsu Kumar Paul
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Models ◽  
Sustainability Science ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Sustainable Livelihoods ◽  
Holistic Approach ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Multidisciplinary Research ◽  
Research Cooperation ◽  
Research Traditions ◽  
Universal Definition

Vulnerability has no universal definition. Experts from various disciplines use the concept and define vulnerability, which leads diverse measuring methods to serve their own purpose and interests. Approaches to define vulnerability vary among the disciplines because of the various components of risk, household response and welfare outcomes. The objective of this paper is to present an overview based on available scientific literature from various disciplines to examine the origin, evolution and use of the vulnerability concept across different field of studies. Vulnerability is exclusively used in various disciplines such as geography, anthropology, economics, ecology, public health, poverty and development, sustainable livelihoods, famine and food security, sustainability science, land management, disaster management and climate change. Therefore, different disciplines have their own reasons for defining, measuring and developing conceptual models of vulnerability; hence there is no reason to presume that concepts, measures and methods will be universal across the disciplines. Lessons learned from one area may not be equally suitable for all. Hence, differences between various fields need to be bridged by a holistic approach and multidisciplinary research cooperation, and geography as a unique multidisciplinary field of study has the major disciplinary legitimacy to fill up the gaps and to create a common platform to work together in vulnerability research among the various research traditions. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jles.v8i0.20150 J. Life Earth Sci., Vol. 8: 63-81, 2013

scholarly journals nr="13"Interdisciplinary Research Methods: Considering the Potential of Community-based Participatory Research in Translation

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-26
Author(s):  
LYNNE BOWKER
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Participatory Research ◽  
Interdisciplinary Research ◽  
Community Based Participatory Research ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Research Traditions ◽  
Related Research ◽  
Potential Barriers ◽  
Health Field ◽  
Population And Public Health

Abstract Different disciplines have different research traditions, including the use of discipline-specific research methods. However, adopting methods from other disciplines can provide fresh perspectives and lead to new insights. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) originated in the population and public health field, but it has potential to be applied in a broader range of disciplines. This article explains the fundamental characteristics of CBPR, explores some misconceptions associated with this method, and describes some potential barriers to its application. Finally, using the example of a machine translation literacy project, the article walks readers through this example of how CBPR was applied to a translation- related research project and evaluates the success of this method for the project.

scholarly journals Mitä on toisen kielen sujuvuus? Näkökulmia kognitiivisen ja puhetuotoksen sujuvuuden tutkimuksesta

2018 ◽  
pp. 234-257
Author(s):  
Sanna Olkkonen ◽  
Pauliina Peltonen
Keyword(s):  
Second Language ◽  
Cognitive Processing ◽  
Review Article ◽  
Research Traditions ◽  
Cognitive Fluency ◽  
Interdisciplinary Dialogue ◽  
Comprehensive Picture ◽  
Similarities And Differences

In this review article, we combine two approaches to the study of second language (L2) fluency: cognitive fluency and utterance fluency. The former concentrates on cognitive processing and its limitations, whereas the latter involves analyzing fluency-related features from speech samples. Despite theoretical links, the research traditions associated with the approaches have been relatively separate. In addition to providing an overview of the two approaches, the similarities and differences between them are illustrated with results related to one aspect of (dis)fluency, repetitions. Bringing together results related to cognitive and utterance fluency highlights the usefulness of combining different viewpoints in L2 fluency research and demonstrates the need for further interdisciplinary dialogue to gain a comprehensive picture of L2 fluency. Together, the results of studies emphasizing different aspects of L2 fluency also have important implications for L2 fluency assessment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document