Constant time interval production planning with application to WIP control in semiconductor fabrication

Author(s):  
K. Miyashita ◽  
K. Senoh ◽  
H. Ozaki ◽  
H. Matsuo
Author(s):  
Motoyasu Honma ◽  
Shoko Saito ◽  
Takeshi Atsumi ◽  
Shin‐ichi Tokushige ◽  
Satomi Inomata‐Terada ◽  
...  

1970 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Hawkes

In the type II counter with constant deadtime, particles which arrive within some constant time τ following another particle are unrecorded. We can think of this process as an alternating sequence of gaps and bunches of events. Gaps have duration > τ, while the intervals between any successive pair of events within a bunch are all ≦ τ. Counter theory is usually concerned with the distribution of intervals between recorded events (i.e., the first event of each bunch) and the distribution of the number of recorded events in a given time interval. In the case where the events form a renewal process this has been studied intensively by Pyke [2], Smith [5] and Takács [6].


Psych ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 128-152
Author(s):  
Guy Madison

Behavioral data are increasingly collected over the Internet. This is particularly useful when participants’ own computers can be used as they are, without any modification that relies on their technical skills. However, the temporal accuracy in these settings is generally poor, unknown, and varies substantially across different hard- and software components. This makes it dubious to administer time-critical behavioral tests such as implicit association, reaction time, or various forms of temporal judgment/perception and production. Here, we describe the online collection and subsequent data quality control and adjustment of reaction time and time interval production data from 7127 twins sourced from the Swedish Twin Registry. The purposes are to (1) validate the data that are already and will continue to be reported in forthcoming publications (due to their utility, such as the large sample size and the twin design) and to (2) provide examples of how one might engage in post-hoc analyses of such data, and (3) explore how one might control for systematic influences from specific components in the functional chain. These possible influences include the type and version of the operating system, browser, and multimedia plug-in type


1970 ◽  
Vol 7 (01) ◽  
pp. 175-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Hawkes

In the type II counter with constant deadtime, particles which arrive within some constant time τ following another particle are unrecorded. We can think of this process as an alternating sequence of gaps and bunches of events. Gaps have duration > τ, while the intervals between any successive pair of events within a bunch are all ≦ τ. Counter theory is usually concerned with the distribution of intervals between recorded events (i.e., the first event of each bunch) and the distribution of the number of recorded events in a given time interval. In the case where the events form a renewal process this has been studied intensively by Pyke [2], Smith [5] and Takács [6].


2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Viau-Quesnel ◽  
Rémi Gaudreault ◽  
Andrée-Anne Ouellet ◽  
Claudette Fortin

Tones are perceived longer than visual stimuli of same durations. One interpretation of this modality effect is that auditory stimuli capture attention more easily than visual stimuli, resulting in more efficient temporal processing. During a time interval production, expecting a break signal lengthens the produced interval, an effect explained by attention sharing between timing and monitoring for the signal occurrence. In the present study, participants produced a brief time interval defined by a visual or an auditory stimulus and in most trials, there was a break in stimulus presentation. The effect of break expectancy was significantly stronger when the timing stimulus was presented in the visual than in the auditory modality, an interaction supporting attentional interpretations of the modality and expectancy effects. We conclude that auditory stimuli orient attention to time more readily than visual stimuli in a context of attention sharing, which reduces the distracting effect of break expectancy.


2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 1919-1931 ◽  
Author(s):  
János Horváth ◽  
Burkhard Maess ◽  
Pamela Baess ◽  
Annamária Tóth

The N1 auditory ERP and its magnetic counterpart (N1[m]) are suppressed when elicited by self-induced sounds. Because the N1(m) is a correlate of auditory event detection, this N1 suppression effect is generally interpreted as a reflection of the workings of an internal forward model: The forward model captures the contingency (causal relationship) between the action and the sound, and this is used to cancel the predictable sensory reafference when the action is initiated. In this study, we demonstrated in three experiments using a novel coincidence paradigm that actual contingency between actions and sounds is not a necessary condition for N1 suppression. Participants performed time interval production tasks: They pressed a key to set the boundaries of time intervals. Concurrently, but independently of keypresses, a sequence of pure tones with random onset-to-onset intervals was presented. Tones coinciding with keypresses elicited suppressed N1(m) and P2(m), suggesting that action–stimulus contiguity (temporal proximity) is sufficient to suppress sensory processing related to the detection of auditory events.


2009 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lea J. Forsman ◽  
Guy Madison ◽  
Fredrik Ullén

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document