Understanding the oral processing of solid foods: Insights from food structure

Author(s):  
Qing Guo
2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 397-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.F. Prinz ◽  
A.M. Janssen ◽  
R.A. de Wijk

Foods ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 613
Author(s):  
María Dolores Álvarez ◽  
Jaime Paniagua ◽  
Beatriz Herranz

This study assessed the usefulness of the miniature Kramer shear cell to determine relevant instrumental parameters of solid foods and bolus counterparts, examining their relationships with oral processing behaviors to obtain greater knowledge about the texture perception process. Six solid foods with different textural properties were tested. Bolus mechanical properties were also determined by means of cone penetration tests and rheological measurements, and their particle size distributions by sieving. Oral processing behavior (chewing time, number of chews, chewing rate, eating rate) and food saliva uptake (SU) of a young volunteer and a panel of 39 untrained participants were analyzed. The Kramer mechanical properties were very suitable for detecting different levels of food and bolus textural hardness and fracturability and the associated degrees of fragmentation achieved during mastication. Chewing time and number of chews were highly correlated with Kramer food and bolus mechanical properties for the single subject and for the panel’s oral processing behaviors. For the single subject, SU and eating rate also showed strong correlations with food and bolus mechanical properties, unlike chewing rate and food moisture content (FMC). In contrast, eating rate, FMC, and SU did not vary with the oral activities of the panel.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 6186-6201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arianne van Eck ◽  
Erin Franks ◽  
Christopher J. Vinyard ◽  
Verónica Galindo-Cuspinera ◽  
Vincenzo Fogliano ◽  
...  

Foods are rarely consumed on their own. Food oral processing behavior and sensory perception of composite foods varying in properties were investigated in this study.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline L. Campbell ◽  
Ty B. Wagoner ◽  
E. Allen Foegeding

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 237-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Koç ◽  
C.J. Vinyard ◽  
G.K. Essick ◽  
E.A. Foegeding

2019 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. 143-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva C. Ketel ◽  
Monica G. Aguayo-Mendoza ◽  
René A. de Wijk ◽  
Cees de Graaf ◽  
Betina Piqueras-Fiszman ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 464-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marine Devezeaux de Lavergne ◽  
Fred van de Velde ◽  
Markus Stieger

This review article focuses on dynamic texture perception, design of food structure and characterisation of oral processing by boli characterisation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 5301-5312 ◽  
Author(s):  
May Sui Mei Wee ◽  
Ai Ting Goh ◽  
Markus Stieger ◽  
Ciarán G. Forde

The correlation between instrumental texture properties and oral processing provides guidance on the parameters that produce ‘faster’ and ‘slower’ versions of foods, and suggests how texture modifications can be applied to moderate eating rate and energy intake within meals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document