Low medical morbidity and mortality after acute courses of electroconvulsive therapy in a population-based sample

2017 ◽  
Vol 136 (6) ◽  
pp. 583-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Blumberger ◽  
D. P. Seitz ◽  
N. Herrmann ◽  
J. G. Kirkham ◽  
R. Ng ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (19) ◽  
pp. 3278-3287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Limor Besser ◽  
Liat Sabag-Shaviv ◽  
Maayan Yitshak-Sade ◽  
Salvatore Andrea Mastrolia ◽  
Danielle Landau ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-31
Author(s):  
Melissa Holdren ◽  
Brittany Deller ◽  
Kevin Braden

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world and is the second most common cause of Canadian cancer-related deaths in men and the third most common in women. Most CRC appears to arise from the gradual development and advancement of colonic adenomatous polyps to cancerous tissue. This developmental process of CRC is the rationale for screening programs which aim to reduce CRC-related morbidity and mortality by early detection and removal of adenomatous polyps, specifically advanced adenomas. Although both the gFOBT and FIT function to detect occult bleeding in asymptomatic patients at average risk for CRC development, the mechanisms of these screening tests are distinct. gFOBT works by detecting the peroxidase activity of heme whereas FIT selectively detects human hemoglobin. The sensitivity in detecting CRC is higher for the FIT, with sensitivity of 0.79 compared to gFOBT with sensitivity of 0.36, they have similar specificities of 0.94 and 0.96, respectively. Currently, both the gFOBT and FIT are strongly recommended across Canada, with all provinces using the FIT, apart from Ontario and Manitoba which currently use the gFOBT to screen asymptomatic patients for CRC. A newer test, the sDNA test, identifies mutations in DNA that are shed by both adenomatous polyps and CRC cells. The sDNA test is more sensitive (0.92 95% CI 0.83-0.98) than both the gFOBT and FIT, however, is less specific and more expensive. Further data surrounding the sDNA test will be required prior to its implementation and recommendation for population based CRC screening in Canada. 


Thorax ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-36
Author(s):  
Nicholas T Vozoris ◽  
Priscila Pequeno ◽  
Ping Li ◽  
Peter C Austin ◽  
Anne L Stephenson ◽  
...  

IntroductionRespiratory-related morbidity and mortality were evaluated in relation to incident prescription oral synthetic cannabinoid (nabilone, dronabinol) use among older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).MethodsThis was a retrospective, population-based, data-linkage cohort study, analysing health administrative data from Ontario, Canada, from 2006 to 2016. We identified individuals aged 66 years and older with COPD, using a highly specific, validated algorithm, excluding individuals with malignancy and those receiving palliative care (n=185 876 after exclusions). An equivalent number (2106 in each group) of new cannabinoid users (defined as individuals dispensed either nabilone or dronabinol, with no dispensing for either drug in the year previous) and controls (defined as new users of a non-cannabinoid drug) were matched on 36 relevant covariates, using propensity scoring methods. Cox proportional hazard regression was used.ResultsRate of hospitalisation for COPD or pneumonia was not significantly different between new cannabinoid users and controls (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.61–1.24). However, significantly higher rates of all-cause mortality occurred among new cannabinoid users compared with controls (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.14–2.39). Individuals receiving higher-dose cannabinoids relative to controls were observed to experience both increased rates of hospitalisation for COPD and pneumonia (HR 2.78; 95% CI 1.17–7.09) and all-cause mortality (HR 3.31; 95% CI 1.30–9.51).ConclusionsNew cannabinoid use was associated with elevated rates of adverse outcomes among older adults with COPD. Although further research is needed to confirm these observations, our findings should be considered in decisions to use cannabinoids among older adults with COPD.


BJPsych Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ole Brus ◽  
Yang Cao ◽  
Åsa Hammar ◽  
Mikael Landén ◽  
Johan Lundberg ◽  
...  

Background Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is effective for unipolar depression but relapse and suicide are significant challenges. Lithium could potentially lower these risks, but is used only in a minority of patients. Aims This study quantifies the effect of lithium on risk of suicide and readmission and identifies factors that are associate with readmission and suicide. Method This population-based register study used data from the Swedish National Quality Register for ECT and other Swedish national registers. Patients who have received ECT for unipolar depression as in-patients between 2011 and 2016 were followed until death, readmission to hospital or the termination of the study at the end of 2016. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) of readmission and suicide in adjusted models. Results Out of 7350 patients, 56 died by suicide and 4203 were readmitted. Lithium was prescribed to 638 (9%) patients. Mean follow-up was 1.4 years. Lithium was significantly associated with lower risk of suicide (P = 0.014) and readmission (HR 0.84 95% CI 0.75–0.93). The number needed to be treated with lithium to prevent one readmission was 16. In addition, the following factors were statistically associated with suicide: male gender, being a widow, substance use disorder and a history of suicide attempts. Readmission was associated with young age, being divorced or unemployed, comorbid anxiety disorder, nonpsychotic depression, more severe symptoms before ECT, no improvement with ECT, not receiving continuation ECT or antidepressants, usage of antipsychotics, anxiolytics or benzodiazepines, severity of medication resistance and number of previous admissions. Conclusions More patients could benefit from lithium treatment. Declaration of interest None.


2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 237-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory A. Nuttall ◽  
Monique R. Bowersox ◽  
Stephanie B. Douglass ◽  
Jenny McDonald ◽  
Laura J. Rasmussen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document