Trends in the overall survival rates in women with advanced ovarian cancer in a single tertiary centre in New Zealand

Ovarian cancer remains the number one gynecological killer in the Western world. Most ovarian cancer patients present with advanced-stage disease and are treated with cytoreductive surgery followed by combination chemotherapy. While the majority of patients respond to treatment, most will relapse such that the 5-year survival rates for advanced disease are approximately 20–25%. Overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) are the primary endpoints in clinical trials in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. In patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, PFS may be the preferred trial endpoint, whereas in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, the primary goal of therapy remains palliation and control of symptoms. Recent studies in recurrent disease have demonstrated that chemotherapy can improve the endpoints of PFS and overall survival, and so they are being used as the primary endpoints for comparing new regimens in phase III trials in relapsed patients. However, it would be easier to compare new treatment modalities if a uniformly accepted instrument was available that could evaluate quality of life and symptom control.

Download Full-text

Synchronous Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer—an International Multicenter Case-Control Study

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer ◽

10.1097/igc.0000000000000019 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 24 (1) ◽

pp. 54-60 ◽

Cited By ~ 26

Author(s):

Florian Heitz ◽

Frederic Amant ◽

Christina Fotopoulou ◽

Marco J. Battista ◽

Pauline Wimberger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Endometrial Cancer ◽

Case Control Study ◽

Group Performance ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Figo Stage ◽

Case Control ◽

Control Study ◽

Overall Survival Rates

ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare the prognosis of patients with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEOC) to matched controls with either endometrial cancer (EC) or ovarian cancer (OC).MethodsA retrospective case-control study including all patients with SEOC who had been treated at 5 European tertiary gynecologic oncology centers between 1996 and 2011 and patients with either EC or OC matched for age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, histology, year of diagnosis, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score.ResultsThe study cohort comprised 77, 132, and 126 patients with SEOC, EC, and OC, respectively. The patient characteristics confirmed an equal distribution of matching factors, and the median follow-up did not differ (P = 0.44). 48.1% of the patients with SEOC showed early FIGO stage I for both EC and OC. The 5-year PFS rates differed between SEOC and EC (76.3% vs 86.3%; P = 0.047) but not the 5-year overall survival rates (71.6% vs 79.8%; P = 0.12) and did not differ between SEOC and OC (76.3% vs 63.8%; P = 0.19 and 71.6% vs 69.3%; P = 0.61, respectively). After the adjustment for the FIGO stage of the 2 components of SEOC, neither PFS nor overall survival rates were different.ConclusionsPrognosis of patients with SEOC tended to be the same in comparison with matched controls with either one EC or OC. Therefore, it could be considered that patients with SEOC may be eligible for clinical trials of the advanced tumor component if no additional therapy is indicated for the other component.

Download Full-text

Use of a Novel Index, the A-Index, and Its Associated Nomogram to Predict Overall Survival Rates after Radical Resection of Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma

SSRN Electronic Journal ◽

10.2139/ssrn.3387510 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Bin Bin Cai ◽

Xiang-Qing Hou ◽

Xiang Zhou ◽

Ting-Ting Ye ◽

Guan Fang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Radical Resection ◽

Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Overall Survival Rates

Download Full-text

Association of chemotherapy with survival in stage II colon cancer patients who received radical surgery: a retrospective cohort study

BMC Cancer ◽

10.1186/s12885-021-08057-3 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Zhihao Lv ◽

Yuqi Liang ◽

Huaxi Liu ◽

Delong Mo

Keyword(s):

Colon Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Prediction Models ◽

Radical Surgery ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Stage Ii ◽

Survival Prediction ◽

Stage Ii Colon Cancer ◽

Overall Survival Rates

Abstract Background It remains controversial whether patients with Stage II colon cancer would benefit from chemotherapy after radical surgery. This study aims to assess the real effectiveness of chemotherapy in patients with stage II colon cancer undergoing radical surgery and to construct survival prediction models to predict the survival benefits of chemotherapy. Methods Data for stage II colon cancer patients with radical surgery were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed according to receive or not receive chemotherapy. Competitive risk regression models were used to assess colon cancer cause-specific death (CSD) and non-colon cancer cause-specific death (NCSD). Survival prediction nomograms were constructed to predict overall survival (OS) and colon cancer cause-specific survival (CSS). The predictive abilities of the constructed models were evaluated by the concordance indexes (C-indexes) and calibration curves. Results A total of 25,110 patients were identified, 21.7% received chemotherapy, and 78.3% were without chemotherapy. A total of 10,916 patients were extracted after propensity score matching. The estimated 3-year overall survival rates of chemotherapy were 0.7% higher than non- chemotherapy. The estimated 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates of non-chemotherapy were 1.3 and 2.1% higher than chemotherapy, respectively. Survival prediction models showed good discrimination (the C-indexes between 0.582 and 0.757) and excellent calibration. Conclusions Chemotherapy improves the short-term (43 months) survival benefit of stage II colon cancer patients who received radical surgery. Survival prediction models can be used to predict OS and CSS of patients receiving chemotherapy as well as OS and CSS of patients not receiving chemotherapy and to make individualized treatment recommendations for stage II colon cancer patients who received radical surgery.

Download Full-text

Vaginal hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy may be an alternative treatment for endometrial cancer patients with medical co-morbidities precluding standard surgical procedures: a systematic review

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer ◽

10.1136/ijgc-2018-000015 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 29 (2) ◽

pp. 299-304 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Arnold-Jan Kruse ◽

Henk G ter Brugge ◽

Harm H de Haan ◽

Hugo W Van Eyndhoven ◽

Hans W Nijman

Keyword(s):

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Endometrial Cancer ◽

Vaginal Hysterectomy ◽

Cancer Survival ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Survival Outcomes ◽

Ovarian Malignancy ◽

Post Menopausal ◽

Ovarian Cancer Survival ◽

Overall Survival Rates

ObjectiveVaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy may be an alternative strategy for patients with low-risk endometrial cancer and medical co-morbidities precluding laparoscopic or abdominal procedures. The current study evaluates the prevalence of co-existent ovarian malignancy in patients with endometrial cancer and the influence of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on survival outcomes in these patients.MethodsMedline and EMBASE were searched for studies published between January 1, 2000 and November 20, 2017 that investigated (1) the prevalence of co-existing ovarian malignancy (either metastases or primary synchronous ovarian cancer in women with endometrial cancer, and (2) the influence of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on recurrence and/or survival rates.ResultsOf the pre-menopausal and post-menopausal patients (n=6059), 373 were identified with metastases and 106 were identified with primary synchronous ovarian cancer. Of the post-menopausal patients (n=6016), 362 were identified with metastases and 44 were identified with primary synchronous ovarian cancer. Survival outcomes did not differ for pre-menopausal patients with endometrial cancer with and without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (5-year overall survival rates were 89–94.5% and 86–97.8%, respectively).ConclusionBilateral salpingo-oophorectomy during vaginal hysterectomy seems to have a limited impact on disease outcome in patients with endometrial cancer. These results support the view that vaginal hysterectomy alone or with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy may be an option for patients with endometrial cancer who are not ideal surgical candidates.

Download Full-text

Long Noncoding RNA Lnc-TLN2-4:1 Suppresses Gastric Cancer Metastasis and Is Associated with Patient Survival

Journal of Oncology ◽

10.1155/2020/8681361 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2020 ◽

pp. 1-8

Author(s):

Yuyun Wu ◽

Ningbo Hao ◽

Suming Wang ◽

Xin Yang ◽

Yufeng Xiao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Noncoding Rna ◽

Tumor Metastasis ◽

Cancer Metastasis ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Migration And Invasion ◽

Poor Overall Survival ◽

Low Expression ◽

Overall Survival Rates

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, and the tumor metastasis leads to poor outcomes of GC patients. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have emerged as new regulatory molecules that play a crucial role in tumor metastasis. However, the biological function and underlying mechanism of numerous lncRNAs in GC metastasis remain largely unclear. Here, we report a novel lncRNA, lnc-TLN2-4:1, whose expression is decreased in GC tissue versus matched normal tissue, and its low expression is involved in the lymph node and distant metastases of GC, as well as poor overall survival rates of GC patients. We further found that lnc-TLN2-4:1 inhibits the ability of GC cells to migrate and invade but does not influence GC cell proliferation and confirmed that lnc-TLN2-4:1 is mainly located in the cytoplasm of GC cells. We then found that lnc-TLN2-4:1 increases the mRNA and protein expression of TLN2 in GC cells and there is a positive correlation between the expression of lnc-TLN2-4:1 and TLN2 mRNA in GC tissue. Collectively, we identified a novel lncRNA, lnc-TLN2-4:1, in GC, where lnc-TLN2-4:1 represses cell migration and invasion. The low expression of lnc-TLN2-4:1 is associated with poor overall survival rates of GC patients. These suggest that lnc-TLN2-4:1 may be a tumor suppressor during GC metastasis.

Download Full-text