The impact of new treatment options for advanced colorectal cancer on routine care: results of a retrospective analysis of 206 consecutive patients treated in a community-based oncology group practice in Germany

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 795-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. KÖPPLER ◽  
J. HEYMANNS ◽  
J. THOMALLA ◽  
K. Kleboth ◽  
R. WEIDE
Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5961-5961
Author(s):  
Rudolf Weide ◽  
Stefan Feiten ◽  
Geothy Chakupurakal ◽  
Vera Friesenhahn ◽  
Kristina Kleboth ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction:Progress has been made in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with CLL who receive their treatment within prospective clinical trials. Clinical trials only include patients who fulfill the selection criteria and hence do not reflect outcomes in routine practice. Data with regards to the diagnosis, treatment and survival of patients in routine care reflecting the improvements in survival following implementation of newer therapy strategies and agents are not available. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients with CLL who were treated in an oncology group practice in Germany between 1995-2015. Relevant clinical data concerning diagnosis, treatment and survival were transferred from clinical files into a database and analysed statistically using SPSS. Results:676 CLL patients with a median age of 67 (35-92) were identified. At initial diagnosis 521 patients (77.1%) were in Binet stage A, 83 (12.3%) Binet stage B and 36 (5.3%) Binet stage C. Due to external diagnosis of 36 patients (5.3%) the stage at initial diagnosis couldn't be retrieved. 361 patients (53.4%) never received any treatment. 315 patients (46.6%) needed therapy with a median of 2 therapy lines (1-13). Regimens most frequently applied were: Bendamustine-containing (68.9%), Rituximab-containing (65.4%), Chlorambucil-containing (55.9%), Bendamustine+Rituximab combinations (48.3%) and Fludarabine-containing (39.4%). Regimens containing recently approved drugs could be found as well. 5.1% received Ibrutinib, 2.9% Obinutuzumab and 2.2% Idelalisib. 17.8% of patients were treated within a clinical trial. 5 and 10 year overall survival was 84.5% and 60.4%. Median overall survival according to Binet stage was 13 years for Binet A, 9 years for Binet B and 9 years for Binet C. Patients who needed therapy had a median overall survival of 11 years (0-42) compared to 17 years (0-27) of patients who never needed any therapy. Conclusions: 53.4% of CLL-patients never needed any therapy. Patients who needed therapy had a much lower life expectancy compared to patients who never needed therapy. Treatment consisted mainly of Bendamustine, Rituximab, Chlorambucil, Bendamustine+Rituximab combinations and Fludarabine leading to a marked prolongation of survival compared to historical controls and registry data. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2009 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 1999-2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Koopman ◽  
Sabine Venderbosch ◽  
Harm van Tinteren ◽  
Marjolijn J. Ligtenberg ◽  
Iris Nagtegaal ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (35) ◽  
pp. 5931-5937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan D. Richman ◽  
Matthew T. Seymour ◽  
Philip Chambers ◽  
Faye Elliott ◽  
Catherine L. Daly ◽  
...  

PurposeActivating mutation of the KRAS oncogene is an established predictive biomarker for resistance to anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) therapies in advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC). We wanted to determine whether KRAS and/or BRAF mutation is also a predictive biomarker for other aCRC therapies.Patients and MethodsThe Medical Research Council Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan: Use and Sequencing (MRC FOCUS) trial compared treatment sequences including first-line fluorouracil (FU), FU/irinotecan or FU/oxaliplatin in aCRC. Tumor blocks were obtained from 711 consenting patients. DNA was extracted and KRAS codons 12, 13, and 61 and BRAF codon 600 were assessed by pyrosequencing. Mutation (mut) status was assessed first as a prognostic factor and then as a predictive biomarker for the benefit of adding irinotecan or oxaliplatin to FU. The association of BRAF-mut with loss of MLH1 was assessed by immunohistochemistry.ResultsThree hundred eight (43.3%) of 711 patients had KRAS-mut and 56 (7.9%) of 711 had BRAF-mut. Mutation of KRAS, BRAF, or both was present in 360 (50.6%) of 711 patients. Mutation in either KRAS or BRAF was a poor prognostic factor for overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.65; P < .0001) but had minimal impact on progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.36; P = .05). Mutation status did not affect the impact of irinotecan or oxaliplatin on PFS or OS. BRAF-mut was weakly associated with loss of MLH1 staining (P = .012).ConclusionKRAS/BRAF mutation is associated with poor prognosis but is not a predictive biomarker for irinotecan or oxaliplatin. There is no evidence that patients with KRAS/BRAF mutated tumors are less likely to benefit from these standard chemotherapy agents.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 030006051989585
Author(s):  
Sai-xi Bai ◽  
Ruo-rong Zhang ◽  
Wang-hua Chen ◽  
Hong-min Dong ◽  
Gang Wang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 270-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabiha Shamsi ◽  
Aasma Shaukat ◽  
Sofia Halperin-Goldstein ◽  
Joshua Colton

Colorectal cancer surveillance intervals by colonoscopy are based on the size and number of polyps removed. Evidence suggests endoscopists’ estimation of polyp size is often inaccurate, but the differences by endoscopists’ characteristics have not been reported. This study assesses endoscopists’ accuracy of measuring polyp illustrations, the effect of endoscopists’ characteristics, and the impact of having a measurement reference. Endoscopists in a community-based, gastroenterology practice estimated the size of several illustrations in a booklet. One month later, they estimated the size of illustrations with a provided measurement reference. Accuracy was defined as no difference between estimated and actual value. Endoscopists were accurate in sizing only 15% of the time, with a tendency toward undersizing. Female endoscopists, those with less than 10 years in practice and those with lower adenoma detection rates, were more likely to undersize polyps. Accuracy of measuring the polyp illustrations increased to 50% ( p < .01) with the measurement reference. The improvement in accuracy was seen across endoscopists’ demographic groups. Endoscopists had poor accuracy of measuring polyp illustrations. Almost universally, endoscopists tended to undersize the polyp illustrations. Accuracy improved significantly with the use of a polyp-measuring guide, particularly when considering important surveillance thresholds of 5 and 10 mm.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document