CR22P�DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION - DO JUNIOR DOCTORS NEED POINTERS IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION?

2009 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. A13-A13
Author(s):  
J. M. Yeung ◽  
H. Yeeles ◽  
S. W. Tang ◽  
S. Amin ◽  
K. Chapple
Keyword(s):  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Junior Doctors ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
The Right

Jejunal strangulation and incarceration associated with bilateral perineal hernias in a neutered male dog

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Ashley E. Iodence ◽  
Michael Perlini ◽  
Janet A. Grimes
Keyword(s):  
Present Report ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Perineal Hernia ◽  
Jejunal Segment ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
Intestinal Strangulation ◽  
Small Intestinal ◽  
The Right ◽  
Intestinal Incarceration

Abstract CASE DESCRIPTION An 8-year-old 6.8-kg neutered male Dachshund was presented for evaluation of vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia, and swelling over the right perineal region. The dog had a history of a bilateral perineal herniorrhaphy and castration 14 months prior to presentation. CLINICAL FINDINGS Bilateral perineal hernias were confirmed by digital rectal examination. Abdominal ultrasonography confirmed the presence of intestine within the right hernia. Three days after admission to the hospital, the region of the right perineal hernia became painful, erythematous, and edematous. Computed tomography revealed jejunal incarceration within the right hernia with dilation of 1 jejunal segment that indicated intestinal obstruction. TREATMENT AND OUTCOME Abdominal exploratory surgery was performed, during which irreducible small intestinal incarceration was confirmed. Intra-abdominal jejunal resection and anastomosis was performed, and an approximately 13-cm-long section of the jejunum was resected. Bilateral perineal herniorrhaphies with internal obturator and superficial gluteal muscle transposition were performed. Six months after surgery, digital rectal examination of the dog revealed that the repair was intact. The dog had no perineal hernia–related clinical signs at the time of the recheck examination. CLINICAL RELEVANCE For the dog of the present report, surgical management of small intestinal strangulation associated with a perineal hernia was successful. Although a portion of the small intestines can frequently be found within perineal hernias in dogs, perineal hernia-related small intestinal strangulation has not been previously described, to the authors’ knowledge. Veterinarians and clients should be aware of this potential complication secondary to perineal hernia and be prepared to perform an abdominal surgical procedure to address small intestinal incarceration in affected dogs.

Case 12.13

2014 ◽  
pp. 588-589
Author(s):  
Christine U. Lee ◽  
James F. Glockner
Keyword(s):  
Seminal Vesicle ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Palpable Mass ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
The Right ◽  
T2 Weighted Images

46-year-old asymptomatic man with a palpable mass above the prostate on digital rectal examination Sagittal (Figure 12.13.1) and axial (Figure 12.13.2) FSE T2-weighted images reveal a complex multicystic lesion involving the right side of the seminal vesicle. Axial T1-weighted FSE image (...

Teaching Digital Rectal Examination to Medical Students Using a Structured Workshop—a Point in the Right Direction?

2013 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 254-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Isherwood ◽  
Zakariye Ashkir ◽  
Sofoklis Panteleimonitis ◽  
Nisha Kumar ◽  
David Hemingway ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
The Right

scholarly journals Ultrasound features of a metastatic seminal vesicle melanoma: A case report

2016 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Fabiani ◽  
Emanuele Principi ◽  
Alessandra Filosa ◽  
Fabrizio Fioretti ◽  
Valentina Maurelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seminal Vesicle ◽  
Ultrasound Examination ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Primary Melanoma ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ultrasound Features

In this report we describe what we consider to be the second case of seminal vescicle (SV) metastasis from an unknown primary melanoma. only presenting symptom was a palpable firm nodule of the right prostate base on digital rectal examination (DRE). The diagnosis, after prostatic transrectal ultrasound examination (TRUS), was performed by ultrasound guided biopsy. We underline that prostatic TRUS evaluation is mandatory in case of abnormal digital rectal examination. Seminal vesicle must be always evaluated.

scholarly journals Clinical diagnosis of prostate cancer using digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson C. Okpua ◽  
Simon I. Okekpa ◽  
Stanley Njaka ◽  
Augusta N. Emeh
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen Test ◽  
Prostate Cancers ◽  
Antigen Tests

Abstract Background Being diagnosed with cancer, irrespective of type initiates a serious psychological concern. The increasing rate of detection of indolent prostate cancers is a source of worry to public health. Digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen tests are the commonly used prostate cancer screening tests. Understanding the diagnostic accuracies of these tests may provide clearer pictures of their characteristics and values in prostate cancer diagnosis. This review compared the sensitivities and specificities of digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen test in detection of clinically important prostate cancers using studies from wider population. Main body We conducted literature search in PubMed, Medline, Science Direct, Wiley Online, CINAHL, Scopus, AJOL and Google Scholar, using key words and Boolean operators. Studies comparing the sensitivity and specificity of digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen tests in men 40 years and above, using biopsy as reference standard were retrieved. Data were extracted and analysed using Review manager (RevMan 5.3) statistical software. The overall quality of the studies was good, and heterogeneity was observed across the studies. The result comparatively shows that prostate-specific antigen test has higher sensitivity (P < 0.00001, RR 0.74, CI 0.67–0.83) and specificity (P < 0.00001, RR 1.81, CI 1.54–2.12) in the detection of prostate cancers than digital rectal examination. Conclusion Prostate-specific antigen test has higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting prostate cancers from men of multiple ethnic origins. However, combination of prostate-specific antigen test and standardized digital rectal examination procedure, along with patients history, may improve the accuracy and minimize over-diagnoses of indolent prostate cancers.

scholarly journals The Digital Divide: A Retrospective Survey of Digital Rectal Examinations during the Workup of Rectal Cancers

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 855
Author(s):  
Omar Farooq ◽  
Ameer Farooq ◽  
Sunita Ghosh ◽  
Raza Qadri ◽  
Tanner Steed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Primary Care Provider ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Patient Questionnaire ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
Rectal Cancers

Background: Digital rectal examination (DRE) is considered an important part of the physical examination. However, it is unclear how many patients have a DRE performed at the primary care level in the work-up of rectal cancer, and if the absence of a DRE causes a delay to consultation with a specialist. Methods: A retrospective patient questionnaire was sent to 1000 consecutive patients with stage II or stage III rectal cancer. The questionnaire asked patients to recall if they had a DRE performed by their general practitioner (GP) when they first presented with symptoms or a positive FIT test. Demographic data, staging data, and time to consultation with a specialist were also collected. Results: A thousand surveys were mailed out, and a total of 262 patients responded. Of the respondents, 46.2% did not recall undergoing a digital rectal examination by their primary care provider. Women were less likely to undergo a DRE than men (28.6% vs. 44.3%, p = 0.019). While there was a trend towards longer times to specialist consultation in patients who did not undergo a DRE (27.0 vs. 12.2 weeks), this was not statistically significant (p = 0.121). Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients who are FIT positive or have symptomatic rectal bleeding do not recall having a DRE by their primary care provider. Barriers may include lack of comfort with performing DRE or lack of time. Clearer guidelines and more support for GP’s may increase uptake of DRE.

scholarly journals Less is more—the best test for anastomotic leaks in rectal cancer patients prior to ileostomy reversal

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Lindner ◽  
Steffen Eitelbuss ◽  
Svetlana Hetjens ◽  
Joshua Gawlitza ◽  
Julia Hardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Colorectal Anastomosis ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Contrast Enema ◽  
Paired Data ◽  
Endoscopic Procedures ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
Ileostomy Reversal

Abstract Purpose No clear consensus exists on how to routinely assess the integrity of the colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of contrast enema, endoscopic procedures, and digital rectal examination in rectal cancer patients in this setting. Methods A systematic literature search was performed. Studies assessing at least one index test for which a 2 × 2 table was calculable were included. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated and used for test comparison. Paired data were used where parameters could not be calculated. Methodological quality was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool. Results Two prospective and 11 retrospective studies comprising 1903 patients were eligible for inclusion. Paired data analysis showed equal or better results for sensitivity and specificity of both endoscopic procedures and digital rectal examination compared to contrast enema. Subgroup analysis of contrast enema according to methodological quality revealed that studies with higher methodological quality reported poorer sensitivity for equal specificity and vice versa. No case was described where a contrast enema revealed an anastomotic leak that was overseen in digital rectal examination or endoscopic procedures. Conclusions Endoscopy and digital rectal examination appear to be the best diagnostic tests to assess the integrity of the colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal. Accuracy measures of contrast enema are overestimated by studies with lower methodological quality. Synopsis of existing evidence and risk–benefit considerations justifies omission of contrast enema in favor of endoscopic and clinical assessment. Trial registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019107771

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document