A Behavior-Genetic Study of the Legacy of Early Caregiving Experiences: Academic Skills, Social Competence, and Externalizing Behavior in Kindergarten

2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 728-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn I. Roisman ◽  
R. Chris Fraley
2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alysia Y. Blandon ◽  
Susan D. Calkins ◽  
Susan P. Keane

AbstractThe longitudinal associations between maternal parenting behavior and toddler risk with children's emotional and social competence were examined during the transition to kindergarten, in a sample of 253 children. Toddler risk was characterized by early externalizing behavior and poor emotion regulation skills. Given that we were interested in the multiple pathways that may result in emotional and social competence, we examined the interactions among maternal parenting behavior and toddler risk. There were some significant interactions, although the pattern of results was not consistent across all competence outcomes. Maternal parenting behavior was not directly associated with children's emotional and social competence. In some instances, maternal control has differential implications for children's emotional and social competence dependent upon the child's level of early risk and maternal positive parenting. Specifically, maternal control tended to be more detrimental for children's emotional competence during the transition to kindergarten, when children exhibit higher levels of risk. Overall, it appears that there are multiple developmental pathways, depending on child and maternal characteristics that lead to early emotional and social competence.


1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 277-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank M. Gresham ◽  
Donald L. Macmillan ◽  
Kathy Bocian

Children considered to be at high risk (n = 30), moderate risk (n = 55), and low risk (n = 30) for behavioral disorders were contrasted on cognitive/achievement, social competence, externalizing behavior, and school history variables. Risk status was based on a 33-item checklist known as the Critical Events Index (Walker & Severson, 1990) that is a measure of behavioral pinpoints having high salience and intensity, but relatively low frequency. Multivariate and univariate analyses showed that the three at-risk groups were differentiated primarily on social competence and externalizing behavior measures. Cross-validated stepwise discriminant function analyses contrasting the High Risk and the Low Risk groups using combinations of social competence, externalizing, internalizing, and school history variables correctly identified over 85% of the High Risk group and over 78% of the Low Risk group. Discriminant function analysis based soley on externalizing behaviors created an unacceptable false negative rate for risk status. Findings are discussed within the context of teacher judgments, critical behavioral events as being “vital signs” of childhood psychopathology, and the need for multimethod assessments of critical events.


Author(s):  
Mark Selikowitz

This is a book about children like Angela and Michael: intelligent children who have a significant and unexplained difficulty in learning. Each child with such difficulties is unique, but they have enough in common with one another for their condition to be summarized by one collective term. I shall use the term ‘specific learning difficulties’ as an umbrella term for this whole group of disorders. A specific learning difficulty can be defined as: . . . an unexpected and unexplained condition, occurring in a child of average or above average intelligence, characterized by a significant delay in one or more areas of learning. . . . In order to understand this definition fully, a number of important questions must be answered. Which areas of learning are involved? What is a ‘significant delay’? Which other causes of difficulty must be excluded? Let us look at these questions one by one. . . . Which areas of learning are involved? . . . The areas of learning involved in specific learning difficulties can be divided into two groups. The first group consists of the basic academic skills: reading, writing, spelling, arithmetic, and language (both comprehension and expression). These are relatively easy skills to measure, and are of central importance to success at school. The second group contains areas of learning that are also vitally important, but are far less well understood. These involve the learning of skills such as persistence, organization, impulse control, social competence, and the coordination of movements. I shall use the term specific learning difficulty to cover significant delay in any of these areas. Children may have only one area involved, or a number of areas. I am, therefore, using the term ‘learning’ in a broad sense, to include all areas of learning, not only academic areas. There are good reasons for grouping all these difficulties together. It has been well established that difficulties in these different areas of learning are closely related. They often coexist in the same child, they are all more common in boys, they all share the same theories of causation, and they all share the same general principles of management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document