scholarly journals New dosing strategies for liposomal amphotericin B in high-risk patients

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 55-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Ellis
Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3971-3971
Author(s):  
Roman Crazzolara ◽  
Julia Hutter ◽  
Josef Fritz ◽  
Christina Salvador ◽  
Cornelia Lass-Flörl ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: Prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in children treated for malignant hematologic disease has traditionally been based on the widespread use of fluconazole. With the awareness of increasing rates of invasive mould infections, new agents have been developed and offered to patients at highest risk. METHODS: We compared the tolerance and outcome of different antifungal prophylaxis in 198 childhood patients treated for acute myeloid and lymphoblastic leukemia in a pediatric cancer center. Until 2011 antifungal prophylaxis with fluconazole was offered to all patients, resulting in 15.2-19.4% of invasive mould infections. As the burden of fungal infections was restricted to high risk patients only (i.e. acute myeloid leukemia, leukemia relapse, high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia and patients after stem cell transplant) and no infection with candida was registered, antifungal prophylaxis was replaced with liposomal amphotericin and offered to this particular patient group. RESULTS: Liposomal amphotericin was well tolerated; there was no occurrence of infusion-related reaction and/or glomerular-associated nephrotoxicity. The development of vincristine-induced neurotoxicity was significantly reduced, as stool frequency was increased up to 38% in patients treated with liposomal amphotericin (p = 0.024). Importantly, there was a marked shift in the percentage of patients with severe constipation (15.5% versus 4.2%, fluconazole versus liposomal amphotericin respectively, p = 0.010). Notably, with limitation of prophylactic treatment to high risk patients a major group of patients did not receive any antifungal prophylaxis (48.81%) and most importantly, the occurrence of invasive fungal infection was completely prevented (p = 0.021). In comparison, 10 patients in the fluconazole group developed proven invasive pulmonary infections. Of these, 6 patients developed disseminated disease, and 4 patients died. Aspergillus was isolated in 40% and rhizopus in 30% of biopsy specimens. CONCLUSION: Polyene prophylaxis offers effective antifungal activity with improved tolerability compared to older agents. The potential impact of this treatment should be included in current prophylaxis guidelines of antileukemic treatment. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3102-3102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria Mattiuzzi ◽  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Jennifer Ho ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Jorge Cortes

Abstract Abstract 3102 Poster Board III-39 Despite the advances in the development of antifungal agents, invasive fungal infections (IFI) remain a significant threat to patients with hematologic malignancies. The importance of early intervention for patients at high-risk for IFI has been widely discussed in several publications; however, the question of whether an early intervention such as prophylaxis is better than empiric or pre-emptive treatment still remains unanswered. Antifungal prophylaxis continues to be routinely used at MDACC for AML and HR-MDS patients. An ideal AFP regimen should be effective, safe, and uncomplicated for the patients. In the search of this ideal regimen, we have explored several options, including different type of drugs and various delivery schedules. Hereby, we report our experience since September 1997 to August 2009 with 730 AML and HR-MDS patients who received AFP for intensive chemotherapy. Proven IFI were defined as per the EORTC criteria. The following regimens were studied: Amphotericin B Lipid Complex (ABLC): 2.5 mg/kg IV three times/week; Liposomal Amphotericin B (AMBI 3TIW): 3 mg/kg IV three times/week; Fluconazole 400 mg (tab) /d + Itraconazole:200 mg (caps) /d (F + I); IV Itraconazole (IV ITRA):200 mg BID X 2 d, then 200 mg IV/d; Caspofungin (CASPO):50 mg IV /d; Voriconazole (IV VORI):400 mg IV BID x 2 d, then 300 mg IV BID; Liposomal Amphotericin B (AMBI 9/W): 9 mg/kg IV once per week; and Voriconazole (PO VORI ): 400 mg BID PO x 1 day, followed by 200 mg PO BID. Patients received ABLC, IV ITRA, F+I, AMBI 3TIW and CASPO since day 1 of IC until IC response was assessed. Pt on IV VORI, AMBI 3TIW and PO VORI started AFP within 24 hours after the last dose of IC until IC response was assessed. There were no significant differences among the pts in the 8 regimens with regards to age, gender, diagnosis, cytogenetics, performance status, presence of no fungal infection at start IC and stayed in protected environment. Table 1 shows our results. Although none of the pts receiving Voriconazole (IV or PO) developed proven IFI, all comparisons of efficacy among the AFP regimens were not significant (p= 0.291). None of the patients on AMBI 3TIW and either VORI had mold infections. There was a significant difference in the number of side effects among the 8 groups (p = 0.03). CASPO and PO VORI were the less toxic regimens. In addition, PO VORI was significantly less toxic than IV VORI (p=0.031). ABLC (N=131) AMBI 3TIW (N=69) F+I (N=67) IV ITRA (N=225) CASPO (N=106) VORI IV (N=61) AMBI 9/w (N=27) PO VORI (N=38) Breakthrough proven IFI n (%) 7(5) 3(4) 3(5) 17(8) 7(7) 0 2 (7) 0 –Yeast 2 3 1 11 3 0 1 0 –Mold 5 0 2 6 4 0 1 0 Drug-related side effects (%) 18 14 7 10 4 21 12 5 We conclude that PO VORI is safe, efficacious and easy to administer to the patients for the prevention of IFI in pts with AML and HR-MDS undergoing IC. CASPO is a safe alternative. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Author(s):  
Natalia Mendoza-Palomar ◽  
Elena Soques ◽  
María Isabel Benitez-Carabante ◽  
Miriam Gonzalez-Amores ◽  
Aurora Fernandez-Polo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Primary antifungal prophylaxis in paediatric allogeneic HSCT recipients is mainly based on azoles, which can have related toxicity and drug interactions. Low-dose liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) is an attractive intravenous alternative because of its low toxicity and lower risk of interactions. Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of L-AmB (1 mg/kg/day) for primary antifungal prophylaxis in pre-engraftment paediatric HSCT patients. Patients and methods Retrospective, observational study including all consecutive patients aged ≤18 years who underwent HSCT and received antifungal prophylaxis with intravenous L-AmB (1 mg/kg/day, from day −1 to 48 h before discharge) between January 2012 and December 2016. Results In total, 125 HSCT procedures in 118 patients were included, median age 7.2 years (IQR 4.2–11.5). Haematological malignancies were the main underlying condition (63.6%), and 109 (87.2%) were considered at high risk for invasive fungal infection (IFI). Ten patients (7.7%), all high risk, developed breakthrough IFI (three Candida spp., seven invasive mould infections) and tended to have higher overall mortality. The only statistically significant risk factor for IFI was cytomegalovirus co-infection. Adverse events, all grade I, occurred in 25 (20%), requiring L-AmB withdrawal in one case. Overall survival at 30 days was 99.2%. At study completion, one patient had died of IFI. Conclusions The incidence of breakthrough IFI was comparable to that of previous reports, with a very low rate of significant toxicity. Thus, prophylactic L-AmB may be a safe, effective option for antifungal prophylaxis in the pre-engraftment phase for children undergoing HSCT, even those at high risk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document