Closed Loop Stimulation Improves Ejection Fraction in Pediatric Patients with Pacemaker and Ventricular Dysfunction

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
FABRIZIO DRAGO ◽  
MASSIMO S. SILVETTI ◽  
ANTONELLA DE SANTIS ◽  
GIOVANNI FAZIO ◽  
GIANLUCA BIANCALANA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Closed Loop ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Closed Loop Stimulation

An Unusual Association: Right Atrial Myxoma and Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction. Case Report and Review of the Literature

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 285
Author(s):  
Lucian Florin Dorobantu ◽  
Ovidiu Chioncel ◽  
Alexandra Pasare ◽  
Dorin Lucian Usurelu ◽  
Ioan Serban Bubenek-Turconi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Right Atrial ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Cardiac Tumors ◽  
Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Increased Risk

Myxomas comprise 50% of all benign cardiac tumors in adults, with the right atrium as their second most frequent site of origin. Surgical resection is the only effective therapeutic option for patients with these tumors. The association between right atrial myxomas and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction is extremely rare and makes treatment even more challenging. This was the case for our patient, a 47-year-old male with a right atrial mass and a severely impaired left ventricular function, with a 20% ejection fraction. Global enlargement of the heart was also noted, with moderate right ventricular dysfunction. The tumor was successfully excised using the on-pump beating heart technique, with an immediate postoperative improvement of the left ventricular ejection fraction to 35%. The technique proved useful, with no increased risk to the patient.

scholarly journals Left and right ventricular dysfunction in patients with COVID-19-associated myocardial injury

Infection ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphanie Bieber ◽  
Angelina Kraechan ◽  
Johannes C. Hellmuth ◽  
Maximilian Muenchhoff ◽  
Clemens Scherer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Function ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Right Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Strain Echocardiography

Abstract Purpose SARS-COV-2 infection can develop into a multi-organ disease. Although pathophysiological mechanisms of COVID-19-associated myocardial injury have been studied throughout the pandemic course in 2019, its morphological characterisation is still unclear. With this study, we aimed to characterise echocardiographic patterns of ventricular function in patients with COVID-19-associated myocardial injury. Methods We prospectively assessed 32 patients hospitalised with COVID-19 and presence or absence of elevated high sensitive troponin T (hsTNT+ vs. hsTNT-) by comprehensive three-dimensional (3D) and strain echocardiography. Results A minority (34.3%) of patients had normal ventricular function, whereas 65.7% had left and/or right ventricular dysfunction defined by impaired left and/or right ventricular ejection fraction and strain measurements. Concomitant biventricular dysfunction was common in hsTNT+ patients. We observed impaired left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) in patients with myocardial injury (-13.9% vs. -17.7% for hsTNT+ vs. hsTNT-, p = 0.005) but preserved LV ejection fraction (52% vs. 59%, p = 0.074). Further, in these patients, right ventricular (RV) systolic function was impaired with lower RV ejection fraction (40% vs. 49%, p = 0.001) and reduced RV free wall strain (-18.5% vs. -28.3%, p = 0.003). Myocardial dysfunction partially recovered in hsTNT + patients after 52 days of follow-up. In particular, LV-GLS and RV-FWS significantly improved from baseline to follow-up (LV-GLS: -13.9% to -16.5%, p = 0.013; RV-FWS: -18.5% to -22.3%, p = 0.037). Conclusion In patients with COVID-19-associated myocardial injury, comprehensive 3D and strain echocardiography revealed LV dysfunction by GLS and RV dysfunction, which partially resolved at 2-month follow-up. Trial registration COVID-19 Registry of the LMU University Hospital Munich (CORKUM), WHO trial ID DRKS00021225.

scholarly journals Forward Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction as a Predictor of Postoperative Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients with Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 3013
Author(s):  
Juyoun Kim ◽  
Jae-Sik Nam ◽  
Youngdo Kim ◽  
Ji-Hyun Chin ◽  
In-Cheol Choi
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Normal Lvef

Background: Left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) can occur immediately after mitral valve repair (MVr) for degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) in some patients with normal preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study investigated whether forward LVEF, calculated as left ventricular outflow tract stroke volume divided by left ventricular end-diastolic volume, could predict LVD immediately after MVr in patients with DMR and normal LVEF. Methods: Echocardiographic and clinical data were retrospectively evaluated in 234 patients with DMR ≥ moderate and preoperative LVEF ≥ 60%. LVD and non-LVD were defined as LVEF < 50% and ≥50%, respectively, as measured by echocardiography after MVr and before discharge. Results: Of the 234 patients, 52 (22.2%) developed LVD at median three days (interquartile range: 3–4 days). Preoperative forward LVEF in the LVD and non-LVD groups were 24.0% (18.9–29.5%) and 33.2% (26.4–39.4%), respectively (p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses showed that forward LVEF was predictive of LVD, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.73–0.86), and an optimal cut-off was 31.8% (sensitivity: 88.5%, specificity: 58.2%, positive predictive value: 37.7%, and negative predictive value: 94.6%). Preoperative forward LVEF significantly correlated with preoperative mitral regurgitant volume (correlation coefficient [CC] = −0.86, p < 0.001) and regurgitant fraction (CC = −0.98, p < 0.001), but not with preoperative LVEF (CC = 0.112, p = 0.088). Conclusion: Preoperative forward LVEF could be useful in predicting postoperative LVD immediately after MVr in patients with DMR and normal LVEF, with an optimal cut-off of 31.8%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document