Differences between tree species seedling and adult altitudinal distribution in mountain forests during the recent warm period (1986-2006)

Ecography ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 765-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Lenoir ◽  
Jean-Claude Gégout ◽  
Jean-Claude Pierrat ◽  
Jean-Daniel Bontemps ◽  
Jean-François Dhôte
2001 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. 169-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika Frehner

The article shows that knowledge of the site of a particular forest stand, together with research results and experience, can provide information that is important for the cultivation of mountain forests, including knowledge of the composition of the tree species and the structure and growth capacity of natural forest. Furthermore, certain sites can, thus, be characterized by factors that influence restocking, such as snow mould,lush ground vegetation or low temperature. The guidelines«minimale Pflegemassnahmen» – «Minimal tending of protection forests» (WASSER und FREHNER, 1996) are based on this principle. For individual sites, warnings about natural dangers such as rock fall or statements concerning nature conservation can be made (e.g., the occurrence of tree species, suitability as a biotope for Capercaille). In conclusion, two research projects on the relationship between site and natural dangers will be presented.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-8
Author(s):  
Denis Gradinarov ◽  
Ognyan Sivilov ◽  
Danail Doychev

The saproxylic species Pediacus dermestoides (Fabricius, 1792) is reported from forest habitats located in five mountains in Bulgaria. The adult beetles were found under the bark of several host tree species or captured with flight interception traps. It seems that P. dermestoides might be widespread in the mountain forests in Bulgaria.


1999 ◽  
Vol 150 (9) ◽  
pp. 342-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dani Rüegg ◽  
Martin Baumann ◽  
Mark Struch ◽  
Simon Capt

In an investigation area in the Bernese Oberland, in which due to the influence of wild animals essential problems of forest regeneration have been predominant for about 30 years, hunting and the influence of the lynx have mutually contributed to a decrease in the deer and chamois populations to a level that allows all tree species in the forest to again regenerate naturally. It seems that the regulation through the intervention of planned hunting and the lynx can be sensibly complemented and thus has led to a dynamic within the stand of wild animals which is especially necessary for the habitat in general and the mountain forest in particular. The further distribution of lynxes within the whole alpine bow is, therefore, to be supported not only in order to protect the species but also to conserve mountain forests.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Floren ◽  
Thomas von Rintelen ◽  
Paul D. N. Hebert ◽  
Bruno Cancian de Araujo ◽  
Stefan Schmidt ◽  
...  

Abstract Tropical mountain forests contribute disproportionately to terrestrial biodiversity but little is known about insect diversity in the canopy and how it is distributed between tree species. We sampled tree-specific arthropod communities from 28 trees by canopy fogging and analysed beetle communities which were first morphotyped and then identified by their DNA barcodes. Our results show that communities from forests at 1100 and 1700 m a.s.l. are almost completely distinct. Diversity was much lower in the upper forest while community structure changed from many rare, less abundant species to communities with a pronounced dominance structure. We also found significantly higher beta-diversity between trees at the lower than higher elevation forest where community similarity was high. Comparisons on tree species found at both elevations reinforced these results. There was little species overlap between sites indicating limited elevational ranges. Furthermore, we exploited the advantage of DNA barcodes to patterns of haplotype diversity in some of the commoner species. Our results support the advantage of fogging and DNA barcodes for community studies and underline the need for comprehensive research aimed at the preservation of these last remaining pristine forests.


2020 ◽  
Vol 139 (6) ◽  
pp. 1057-1065
Author(s):  
Marcin Matysek ◽  
Robert Gwiazda ◽  
Zbigniew Bonczar

Abstract Hazel grouse habitat requirements are relatively well known in coniferous forests, and less known in mixed or deciduous forests. We studied habitat differences between sites occupied by hazel grouse Tetrastes bonasia and control plots in mixed mountain forests of the Western Carpathians in 2009 and 2010. Hazel grouse presence at sites was determined in April and May. The habitat variables (n = 21) and the proportion of tree and shrub species (n = 22) were collected both in sites of hazel grouse presence and control plots within a radius of 100 m. Greater numbers of tree species and greater proportions of deciduous trees (mainly birch Betula sp.) were found in sites where hazel grouse was present. Lower canopy cover was an important variable for hazel grouse occurrence, and sites with hazel grouse had a greater proportion of young trees (< 40 years). Sites were also characterized by a higher proportion of overgrown glades and dead woods in comparison with control plots. Sites occupied by hazel grouse were characterized by a greater number of tree species in the undergrowth (minimum of five species) in comparison with control plots. GLM models revealed that the most important environmental factors for hazel grouse occurrence in mixed mountain forests were open habitats (overgrown glades), good hiding opportunities (fallen trees and dead woods) and good conditions for foraging (trees cover in undergrowth). Poplar (Populus sp.) and willow (Salix sp.) were the most important tree species for hazel grouse occurrence. The presence of habitat structures and the vegetations richness provides good shelter or food for the hazel grouse. Extensive forest management should be proposed to increase the number of hazel grouse. Large areas covered by herbs and light-seeded tree species of low economical value for forestry are recommended to support hazel grouse population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document