scholarly journals Risk factors and clinical characteristics of recurrent ectopic pregnancy: A case–control study

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 1098-1103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyan Wang ◽  
Lu Huang ◽  
Yan Yu ◽  
Sheng Xu ◽  
Yucheng Lai ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Li ◽  
Wei-Hong Zhao ◽  
Qian Zhu ◽  
Shu-Jun Cao ◽  
Hua Ping ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 1340-1344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Butts ◽  
Mary Sammel ◽  
Amy Hummel ◽  
Jesse Chittams ◽  
Kurt Barnhart

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S078-S079
Author(s):  
Y Zabana Abdo ◽  
I Marín-Jiménez ◽  
I Rodríguez-Lago ◽  
I Vera ◽  
M D Martín ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The information regarding IBD patients with COVID-19 suggests that the factors related to bad outcome are older age and comorbidity whereas immunosuppressants do not have a significant impact worsening the disease evolution. To date, there is no information to assess if there are differences in epidemiological, demographical, and clinical characteristics between infected and non-infected IBD patients. Methods Case-control study in IBD patients with COVID-19 (cases) compared to IBD without COVID-19 (controls) in the period March-July/2020 within the ENEIDA registry (promoted by GETECCU and with more than 60.000 IBD patients included). Cases were matched 1:2 by age (±5y), type of disease (CD/UC), gender, and centre. All controls were selected from only one investigator blind to other clinical characteristics of the patients to avoid selection bias. Results 496 cases and 964 controls from 63 Spanish centres were included. No differences were found within the basal characteristics including CD location, CD behaviour, extraintestinal manifestations, family history of IBD or smoking habits. Cases had ≥ 1 comorbidities (cases:43%vs. controls:36%, p=0.01) and occupational risk (cases:27% vs. controls:10.6%, p<0.0001) in a higher proportion. Strict lockdown but not sick leave nor telecommuting was the only measure demonstrating protection against COVID-19 (cases:49% vs. controls:70%, p<0.0001). There were no differences in the use of systemic steroids (p=0.19), immunosuppressants (p=0.54) or biologics (p=0.25) between cases and controls. Cases were more often treated with aminosalicylates (45% vs.34%, p=0.022). Having ≥ 1 comorbidities (OR:1.4, 95%CI: 1–1.8), occupational risk (OR:2.05, 95%CI:1.5–2.9) and the use of aminosalicylates (OR:1.4, 95%CI: 1–1.8) were risk factors for COVID-19. On the other hand, the strict lockdown was a protective factor (OR:0.36, CI:0.27–0.48). Conclusion Comorbidities and epidemiological risk factors are the most relevant aspects for the risk of COVID-19 in IBD patients. This risk of COVID-19 seems to be increased by aminosalicylates but not by immunosuppressants or biologics. The attitude regarding treating IBD patients with aminosalicylates during the COVID-19 pandemic deserves a deeper analysis. Funded by the Carlos III Health Institute COV20/00227.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nooria Atta ◽  
Fahima Aram ◽  
Nafisa Naseri ◽  
Mahbooba Sahak

Abstract Background: Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is defined as a pregnancy in which fertilized oocyte implants outside the endometrial cavity. Although there is no known etiology for ectopic pregnancy, some risk factors of EP have been determined. It has been evident that ectopic pregnancy can be of multifactorial origin. This multicenter research aims to study risk factors associated with increased risk of ectopic pregnancy in women living in Kabul. Methods: A multicenter case control study was conducted in five tertiary maternity hospitals located in Kabul, Afghanistan. A total of 457 pregnant women were included in this study. In the case group, women with diagnosed ectopic pregnancy, while in control group women with intrauterine pregnancy were included. For each case in this study, two controls were enrolled. Results: The mean (SD) age of women in case group was 27.9 (6) years while in control group it was 26.4 (5.5) years. This difference was not statistically significant. We found a significant association between history of abortion and EP (Adj. OR=1.57; 95%CI: 1.02, 2.42). Having history of abdominal/pelvic surgery was a risk factor for EP with adjusted OR 1.94 (95%CI: 1.15, 3.30). In this study we found an increasing risk of EP in women of 35 years or older compared to younger women (Crude OR=2.26; p= 0.024). In women reporting prior EP, the chance of its recurrence was increased (Crude OR= 9.64; 95%CI: 1.1, 83.2). No association of gravidity and parity was found with EP incidence. Conclusions: In this study we found a statistically significant association between history of abdominal/pelvic surgery and EP. In addition, history of abortion was suggested as a risk factor for ectopic pregnancy. In case of having a previous EP probability of its recurrence will be increased. Women with advanced age having other potential risk factors will be facing higher risk of EP.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document