Translational Research in a Military Organization: The Marine Corps Organizational Culture Research Project

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-32
Author(s):  
Kerry B. Fosher ◽  
Rebecca Lane ◽  
Erika Tarzi ◽  
Kristin Post ◽  
Eric M. Gauldin ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amarjeev Kaul

Purpose Appreciation of the utility of strategy and the vitality of the culture in an organization can realize the development of a new culture-centric strategic business model (SBM). Culture beats, eats or trumps strategy is a legitimate and powerful argument often thrown to the air. The purpose of this paper is to un-code the relevance of this argument and to decode its significance. Design/methodology/approach This is a conceptual paper and builds on prior conceptual and empirical management research related to strategy and organizational culture. The approach is unbiased toward either strategy or culture. Findings The conclusion arrived at is that, in general, strategy must precede culture and culture must be aligned. In specific instances of governance, inner workings of a military organization, cross-cultural context of negotiations, creative advertising and management of change culture may predominate in tactics. Furthermore, with a strategy gone astray, or in the instance of a floundering business or start-up venture, culture must shift to first gear, lead the requisite goal and path development, and strategy must be aligned in the transition. A strategy–culture fit supports a sustained competitive advantage by virtue of a firm’s unique culture proposition (UCP). Research limitations/implications The development of a culture-centric SBM will need to be tested by empirical research. The UCP will also need to be researched further. Practical implications The conclusion that strategy should generally precede culture will guide firms from not letting their organizational culture from undermining the success of major shifts in strategic goals and business model positioning. Originality/value The conceptual arguments will help leaders and managers from marginalizing the value of strategy. However, managers will also be directed toward paying attention to the damaging consequences of ignoring culture. Furthermore, managers will be able to appreciate that culture must not drive strategy, except in specific strategic decision-making contexts.


2011 ◽  
pp. 1137-1154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent M. Ribiere ◽  
Francis D. Tuggle

The discipline of knowledge management (KM) is no longer emerging, but some organizations are still struggling to find the right approach that will allow them to fully take advantage of their intellectual assets. Having the proper organizational culture remains an important barrier to knowledge management success. This empirical research project, conducted with data from 97 organizations involved in KM, explores relationships between the level of organizational trust and the use of KM methodologies, in particular the use of codification KM methodologies and personalization KM methodologies. The presence of trust can also be used as an indicator of KM initiative success. The contribution of this research may help organizations seeking to launch or adapt a KM initiative to choose which KM tools and technologies to deploy in order to maximize their chance of success. Finally, a rank-ordered list of KM methodologies in descending order of usefulness is reported.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document