Occlusive versus neurotoxic agents for topical treatment of head lice infestation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rowena Natividad S. Flores‐Genuino ◽  
Charissa Mia S. Gnilo ◽  
Belen L. Dofitas
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Topical Treatment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Head Lice ◽  
Head Lice Infestation

scholarly journals Prevalence of Head Lice Infestation and Its Associated Factors among Primary School Students in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 346-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmood Moosazadeh ◽  
Mahdi Afshari ◽  
Hormoz Keianian ◽  
Asghar Nezammahalleh ◽  
Ahmad Ali Enayati
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary School ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Head Lice ◽  
Primary School Students ◽  
School Students ◽  
Head Lice Infestation

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy and safety of interventions for treating head lice: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e001129
Author(s):  
Bill Stevenson ◽  
Wubshet Tesfaye ◽  
Julia Christenson ◽  
Cynthia Mathew ◽  
Solomon Abrha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Head Lice ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Meta Analyses

BackgroundHead lice infestation is a major public health problem around the globe. Its treatment is challenging due to product failures resulting from rapidly emerging resistance to existing treatments, incorrect treatment applications and misdiagnosis. Various head lice treatments with different mechanism of action have been developed and explored over the years, with limited report on systematic assessments of their efficacy and safety. This work aims to present a robust evidence summarising the interventions used in head lice.MethodThis is a systematic review and network meta-analysis which will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement for network meta-analyses. Selected databases, including PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be systematically searched for randomised controlled trials exploring head lice treatments. Searches will be limited to trials published in English from database inception till 2021. Grey literature will be identified through Open Grey, AHRQ, Grey Literature Report, Grey Matters, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry and International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number registry. Additional studies will be sought from reference lists of included studies. Study screening, selection, data extraction and assessment of methodological quality will be undertaken by two independent reviewers, with disagreements resolved via a third reviewer. The primary outcome measure is the relative risk of cure at 7 and 14 days postinitial treatment. Secondary outcome measures may include adverse drug events, ovicidal activity, treatment compliance and acceptability, and reinfestation. Information from direct and indirect evidence will be used to generate the effect sizes (relative risk) to compare the efficacy and safety of individual head lice treatments against a common comparator (placebo and/or permethrin). Risk of bias assessment will be undertaken by two independent reviewers using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the certainty of evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations guideline for network meta-analysis. All quantitative analyses will be conducted using STATA V.16.DiscussionThe evidence generated from this systematic review and meta-analysis is intended for use in evidence-driven treatment of head lice infestations and will be instrumental in informing health professionals, public health practitioners and policy-makers.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017073375.

Risk of lymphoma in patients with atopic dermatitis and the role of topical treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 992-1002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laureline Legendre ◽  
Thomas Barnetche ◽  
Juliette Mazereeuw-Hautier ◽  
Nicolas Meyer ◽  
Dedee Murrell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Atopic Dermatitis ◽  
Topical Treatment ◽  
Meta Analysis

Oral treatment with/without topical treatment vs topical treatment alone in Malassezia Folliculitis patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Chaitidis ◽  
Charalampos Festas ◽  
Ioanna Aritzi ◽  
Maria Kyriazopoulou
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Topical Treatment ◽  
Oral Treatment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Malassezia Folliculitis

Resina Draconis as a topical treatment for pressure ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 565-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaqi Xu ◽  
Tian Xiong ◽  
Ying Yang ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
Jing Mao
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Topical Treatment ◽  
Pressure Ulcers ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Resina Draconis

The effects of low-ratio n-6/n-3 PUFA on biomarkers of inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yali Wei ◽  
Yan Meng ◽  
Na Li ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Liyong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Fatty Acid ◽  
Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid ◽  
Inflammation Markers ◽  
Pufa Supplementation ◽  
Long Chain

The purpose of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine if low-ratio n-6/n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) supplementation affects serum inflammation markers based on current studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document