Abstract
Primary Subject area
Paediatric Radiology
Background
Peripherally inserted central catheters are commonly used in pediatrics to offer stable access for administering prolonged courses of antibiotics, chemotherapy, parenteral nutrition, or other intravenous fluids.
Objectives
To assess the complication rates of cuffed versus uncuffed PICCs in a pediatric tertiary referral centre.
Design/Methods
Research ethics board approval was sought and granted. A dual arm study design was employed with a retrospective chart review of PICCs inserted between June 2017 - June 2018, and a prospective chart review of PICCS inserted between January 2019 - June 2019 at a large tertiary pediatric referral center. Data collected from the electronic record included age, weight, and diagnosis. Line type, size, location, insertion and removal dates, and indications were recorded. Primary outcome was removal of PICC after completion of therapy or premature removal due to the following complications: infection, thrombosis, or mechanical failure (defined as catheter breakage, blockage, or dislodgement).
Results
The study included 266 patients. Across all patients weighing < 10 kg, 90.5% of those with cuffed PICCs and 65% of those with uncuffed catheters completed therapy. The predominant complication resulting in premature removal was mechanical failure, but this was only observed in patients with uncuffed catheters (25%). Infection was also observed only in uncuffed catheters (10%), and thrombosis (4.8%) was only in the cuffed lines. For patients weighing ≥ 10 kg, 86% of those with cuffed PICCs and 77.2% with uncuffed catheters completed therapy. More complications were observed in uncuffed catheters (infection 7.7%, mechanical failure 6.6%, thrombosis 5%). Infection resulting in premature removal occurred in 7% of cuffed catheters. There was no reported mechanical failure or thrombosis in the cuffed group. The distribution of diagnoses was relatively homogenous between the groups for most diagnoses. However, there was a higher percentage of oncology patients in the uncuffed group (23%) than the cuffed group (7%) due to the need for power-injectable lines, which were not available in a cuffed variant during this study.
Conclusion
All-cause pediatric PICC-associated complications rate in the neonate group for patients < 10kg in the uncuffed group is 35% and in the cuffed group is 4.8%. Whereas in the pediatric group ≥ 10kg, all-cause pediatric PICC-associated complications rate in the uncuffed group is 19.3% and in the cuffed group is 7%. There were no mechanical complications in the cuffed group and the vast majority of lines made it to completion of therapy. This work supports utilization of cuffed PICC lines in selected pediatric patients.
Is Orally Administered Pentobarbital a Safe and Effective Alternative to Chloral Hydrate for Pediatric Procedural Sedation?
