Immunohistochemical analysis of aromatase in metastatic lymph nodes of breast cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukiko Shibahara ◽  
Yasuhiro Miki ◽  
Takanori Ishida ◽  
Yasuhiro Nakamura ◽  
Takashi Suzuki ◽  
...  
Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (22) ◽  
pp. 5616
Author(s):  
Eugenia Fernandez ◽  
Luis Ubillos ◽  
Nabila Elgul ◽  
María Florencia Festari ◽  
Daniel Mazal ◽  
...  

Breast cancer is a public health concern and is currently the fifth cause of mortality worldwide. Identification of different biological subtypes is essential for clinical management; therefore, the role of pathologists is essential and useful tools for immunohistochemistry diagnosis are needed. Polypeptide-GalNAc-transferases are emerging novel biomarkers related to cancer behavior and GalNAc-T13, correlated with aggressiveness in some tumors, is an interesting candidate. Few monoclonal antibodies reacting with native proteins, and not affected by fixation and paraffin embedding, have been reported. The aim of this work was to develop a useful monoclonal antibody anti-GalNAc-T13 and to assess its potential significance in breast cancer diagnosis. We evaluated 6 human breast cancer cell lines, 338 primary breast tumors and 48 metastatic lymph nodes and looked for clinical significance correlating GalNAc-T13 expression with patients’ clinical features and survival. We found high GalNAc-T13 expression in 43.8% of the cases and observed a significant higher expression in metastatic lymph nodes, correlating with worse overall survival. We hypothesized several possible molecular mechanisms and their implications. We conclude that GalNAc-T13 may be a novel biomarker in breast cancer, useful for routine pathological diagnosis. Elucidation of molecular mechanisms related to aggressiveness should contribute to understand the role of GalNAc-T13 in breast cancer biology.


Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (23) ◽  
pp. 37332-37341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elise Furet ◽  
Morad El Bouchtaoui ◽  
Jean-Paul Feugeas ◽  
Catherine Miquel ◽  
Christophe Leboeuf ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriko Nemoto ◽  
Yukiko Shibahara ◽  
Hiroshi Tada ◽  
Keiko Uchida ◽  
Keely M. McNamara ◽  
...  

Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been increasingly utilized in the treatment of breast cancer patients. However, there are no established surrogate markers predicting the response to subsequent adjuvant therapy and clinical outcome of patients. In particular, whether primary or lymph nodes metastasis should be evaluated for these analyses has remained unknown. Therefore, in this study, we first evaluated the differences in biomarkers between primary and metastatic cancer tissues in the patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We then correlated the findings with the clinical outcomes of these patients. Methods We examined 49 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent surgery with lymph node metastasis. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and Ki-67 were all immunohistochemically evaluated in core needle biopsy samples from primary and metastatic tumors following chemotherapy. Results No statistically significant differences in these markers were detected between the primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes following therapy, but the Ki-67 labeling index was significantly higher in metastatic lymph nodes than in primary tumor (p = 0.017). The patients associated with luminal A type carcinoma in their lymph nodes following chemotherapy demonstrated significantly better clinical outcomes (disease-free survival: p = 0.0045, overall survival: p = 0.0006) than those who were not. Conclusion These data indicate that subtype classification following chemotherapy, in the metastatic lymph nodes rather than primary tumor could predict long-term outcomes of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11575-e11575
Author(s):  
Ludimila Cavalcante ◽  
Simon B. Zeichner ◽  
Gabriel P Suciu ◽  
Ana L. Ruiz ◽  
Alicia Hirzel ◽  
...  

e11575 Background: Axillary lymph node status is one of the most important prognostic factors in patients with breast cancer, and those with more than ten metastatic lymph nodes at diagnosis have a decreased overall survival. The purpose of this study is to better characterize the clinical course of this high-risk, poorly described patient population and determine the factors associated with long-term survival. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of all breast cancer patients with greater than ten metastatic lymph nodes diagnosed at Mt. Sinai Medical Center from January 1990 to December 2007 (n= 175). Descriptive frequencies, overall median survival (OMS), 5- and 10-year survival were calculated for standard prognostic factors and treatment variables. Univariate statistical analysis was performed, followed by a multivariate prognostic analysis for time-to-event data, using the Cox and extended Cox regression model. Results: The majority of patients were non-Hispanic white females between the ages of 56-70, diagnosed between 1990-1999, with tumors between 2-5 cm and 10-15 metastatic lymph nodes. Most were ER/PR positive, HER2 negative, and treated with surgery, chemotherapy, radiation and hormonal therapy. The OMS was 94 months (CI = 69-114) with 5- and 10-year survival rates of 64.3 and 41.6%, respectively. Ages between 21-45 years (OMS of 187 months, p = 0.03), tumors less than 2 cm (146 months (95% CI = 85-198), p = 0.02), ER positivity (131 months (95% CI = 94-157) vs. 39 months (95% CI = 27-59), p = 0.0003) and treatment received between 2000-2003 (98 months (95% CI = 55-133), p = 0.02) were all associated with significantly improved survival. Conclusions: Over the past decade there were significant gains in the long-term survival of breast cancer patients with greater than ten positive nodes at diagnosis, possibly due to improvements in multimodality therapy, such as the introduction of taxanes, although stage migration may be another contributing factor. Our study further showed an encouraging survival for ER positive patients and a dismal one for ER negative patients, highlighting the need for new targeted therapies directed towards ER negative tumors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document