scholarly journals Implication of actin in the uptake of sucrose and valine in the tap root and leaf of sugar beet

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Michonneau ◽  
Pierrette Fleurat‐Lessard ◽  
Anne Cantereau ◽  
Alexandre Crépin ◽  
Gabriel Roblin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2001 ◽  
Vol 52 (365) ◽  
pp. 2381-2385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heiko Rosenkranz ◽  
Rolf Vogel ◽  
Steffen Greiner ◽  
Thomas Rausch

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helle Turesson ◽  
Mariette Andersson ◽  
Salla Marttila ◽  
Ingela Thulin ◽  
Per Hofvander

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Behrend Heeren ◽  
Stefan Paulus ◽  
Heiner Goldbach ◽  
Heiner Kuhlmann ◽  
Anne-Katrin Mahlein ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The efficient and robust statistical analysis of the shape of plant organs of different cultivars is an important investigation issue in plant breeding and enables a robust cultivar description within the breeding progress. Laser scanning is a highly accurate and high resolution technique to acquire the 3D shape of plant surfaces. The computation of a shape based principal component analysis (PCA) built on concepts from continuum mechanics has proven to be an effective tool for a qualitative and quantitative shape examination. Results: The shape based PCA was used for a statistical analysis of 140 sugar beet roots of different cultivars. The calculation of the mean sugar beet root shape and the description of the main variations was possible. Furthermore, unknown and individual tap roots could be attributed to their cultivar by means of a robust classification tool based on the PCA results. % (classification), based on characteristic tap root shapes. Conclusion: The method demonstrates that it is possible to identify principal modes of root shape variations automatically and to quantify associated variances out of laser scanned 3D sugar beet tap root models. The introduced approach is not limited to the 3D shape description by laser scanning. A transfer to 3D MRI or radar data is also conceivable.


Plant Disease ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 90 (12) ◽  
pp. 1554-1554 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. E. Hanson

Fusarium yellows of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlechtend.Fr. f. sp. betae (Stewart) Snyd & Hans., has been a long-term problem in the western United States (3) and recently was reported in Minnesota and North Dakota (4). This disease is typified by interveinal yellowing and wilting of the foliage. Roots have no external symptoms but show internal vascular discoloration. In 2005, 12 sugar beet roots from Michigan with yellows-type symptoms were received by the author. Isolations were made from the cortical and vascular tissue of the crown and tap root. Fusarium spp. isolates were obtained from 10 of the beets, and 16 isolates were identified as Fusarium oxysporum on the basis of morphology and pigmentation on potato dextrose agar and spores and phialides on carnation leaf agar (2). F. oxysporum isolates were tested for pathogenicity by dipping roots of 5-week-old susceptible sugar beet plants (FC716) in a suspension of 104 spores per ml for 8 min, 10 plants per isolate. Two known pathogenic isolates of F. oxysporum f. sp. betae, Fob13 and Fob216c (4), were used for comparison. For a negative control, plants were dipped in sterile water. Beets were planted in Cone-tainers (3.8 cm diameter × 21 cm) containing pasteurized potting mix. Plants were placed in a greenhouse at 24 to 27°C and fertilized with 15-30-15 fertilizer every 2 weeks to avoid chlorosis from nutrient deficiency. Plants were rated weekly for foliar symptoms for 6 weeks using a Fusarium yellows rating scale of 0 to 4 in which 0 = no disease and 4 = complete plant death (1). After the final rating, plants were removed from soil and the tap root examined for root symptoms. Root segments were surface disinfested with 0.5% sodium hypochlorite and cultured on potato dextrose agar to confirm presence of the pathogen. The experiment was done twice. Seven F. oxysporum isolates tested caused typical Fusarium yellows symptoms including interveinal yellowing, stunting, and wilting of inoculated plants. Pathogenic isolates were obtained from 7 of the 10 beets that yielded F. oxysporum. Symptoms were indistinguishable from those caused by Fob13 (average ratings ranged from 1.8 to 2.4) and milder than those caused by Fob216c (average rating 3.1). No interveinal chlorosis or wilting was observed on the control plants. Isolations from inoculated plants provided F. oxysporum cultures morphologically similar to those used in inoculation by the methods of Nelson et al. (2). No F. oxysporum was isolated from control plants. To my knowledge, this is the first report of F. oxysporum causing Fusarium yellows on beet in Michigan. References: (1) L. E. Hanson and A. L. Hill. J. Sugar Beet Res. 41:163, 2004. (2) P. E. Nelson et al. Fusarium species: An Illustrated Manual for Identification. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, 1983. (3). C. L. Schneider and E. D. Whitney. Fusarium Yellows. Page 18 in: Compendium of Beet Diseases and Insects. C. L. Schneider and E. D. Whitney, eds. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN, 1986. (4) C. E. Windels et al. Plant Dis. 89:341, 2005.


Plant Disease ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 686-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. E. Hanson

In 2004, we received beet samples from seven fields from Minnesota and Wyoming that had foliar interveinal yellowing symptoms and vascular discoloration frequently associated with Fusarium yellows. Isolations were made from the vascular and cortical tissue. Hyphal tip isolates of Fusarium were obtained from beets, including eight isolates of Fusarium graminearum. F. graminearum was isolated from beets from three fields in Minnesota and one field in northern Wyoming. F. graminearum isolates were tested for pathogenicity by dipping roots of 5-week-old sugar beet plants (FC716) in a suspension of 104 spores per ml for 8 min, 10 plants per isolate. Spore suspensions were shaken periodically to aid mixing. A known moderately virulent isolate of F. oxysporum f. sp. betae (Fob13) (3), the causal agent of Fusarium yellows of sugar beet, was used as a positive control. For a negative control, plants were dipped in sterile water. Dipped plants were planted in Cone-tainers (3.8 cm diameter × 21 cm; Stuewe and Sons, Inc., Corvallis, OR) containing pasteurized potting mix and placed in a greenhouse at 24 to 27°C. Plants were fertilized with 15-30-15 fertilizer biweekly. After 2 weeks, plants were rated weekly for 5 weeks using a 0 to 4 scale in which 0 = no disease and 4 = complete plant death (2). After the final rating, plants were removed from soil and the tap root was examined for symptoms. Root segments were surface disinfested with 0.5% sodium hypochlorite and plated on potato dextrose agar to confirm presence of the pathogen. The experiment was done twice. Three of the eight isolates of F. graminearum caused mild to moderate foliar symptoms (rating 2 to 3), including interveinal yellowing, wilting, and stunting of inoculated plants, and mild vascular discoloration was observed in some root sections. Pathogenic isolates were originally from different beets. Foliar symptoms were similar to those caused by Fob13, but the F. oxysporum f. sp. betae caused more vascular discoloration than did the F. graminearum isolates. No interveinal yellowing or wilting was observed on foliage of the control plants, and no vascular discoloration was observed in a cross section of the root. Cultures of F. graminearum or F. oxysporum recovered from inoculated plants were morphologically similar to isolates used for the inoculations. No Fusarium was isolated from the roots of plants soaked in sterile water. An interesting note is that no isolates of F. graminearum were recovered among more than 100 Fusarium isolates collected from sugar beet roots from Colorado over a 4-year period. F. graminearum was recovered in one sample from Wyoming in 2004. However, in the 2004 samples from Minnesota, this species was isolated at the same frequency as F. oxysporum. While F. graminearum has been isolated from beets in the Red River Valley (1), it has not previously been reported to cause symptoms on growing sugar beet. References: (1) U. Bosch and C. J. Mirocha. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:3233, 1992. (2) L. E. Hanson and A. L. Hill. J. Sugar Beet Res. 41:139, 2004. (3) C. E. Windels et al. Plant Dis. 89:341, 2005.


1979 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 837-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Wyse

2004 ◽  
Vol 161 (12) ◽  
pp. 1299-1314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Michonneau ◽  
Gabriel Roblin ◽  
Janine Bonmort ◽  
Pierrette Fleurat-Lessard

2007 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 699-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Bellin ◽  
Britta Schulz ◽  
Thomas Rosleff Soerensen ◽  
Francesco Salamini ◽  
Katharina Schneider

2001 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalid Fares ◽  
C. M. G. C. Renard ◽  
Qamar R'Zina ◽  
Jean-Francois Thibault
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-353
Author(s):  
N. B. Kift ◽  
F. A. Mellon ◽  
A. M. Dewar ◽  
A. F. G. Dixon
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document