PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF BASELINE ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN POCKET SWITCHED NETWORK

2016 ◽  
Vol 78 (8-2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deni Yulianti ◽  
Satria Mandala ◽  
Anazida Zainal ◽  
Dewi Nasien ◽  
Md. Asri Ngadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
Delay Tolerant Network ◽  
Delivery Ratio ◽  
Message Delivery ◽  
Switched Network ◽  
Direct Delivery ◽  
Overhead Ratio ◽  
Spray And Wait

Pocket Switched Network (PSN) is a branch of Delay Tolerant Network (DTN) which is intended to work in a challenged network. Challenged network is network with lack of infrastructure such as disaster area. As such, the network has intermittent connectivity. PSN provides a new paradigm to distribute messages in the network by taking advantage of roaming nodes from one place to another. In this paper, network performances of eight PSN routing protocols are investigated namely, First Contact, Direct Delivery, Epidemic, PRotocol using History of Encounter and Transitivity (PRoPHET), Spray and Wait, Binary Spray and Wait, Fuzzy Spray, Adaptive Fuzzy Spray and Wait. The performance metrics are packet delivery ratio, overhead ratio and average latency. Opportunistic Network Environment (ONE) simulator is used to evaluate the network performance. Experiments show that Epidemic has the best performance in term of message delivery ratio, but it has the highest overhead ratio. Direct Delivery has the lowest overhead ratio (zero overhead ratio) and PRoPHET has the lowest latency average.

ANALYSIS OF EPIDEMIC, PROPHET AND SPRAY AND WAIT ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN THE MOBILE OPPORTUNISTIC NETWORKS

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasvir Singh ◽  
Raman Maini
Keyword(s):  
Mobile Networks ◽  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Opportunistic Networks ◽  
Delay Tolerant Network ◽  
Delivery Ratio ◽  
Message Delivery ◽  
Message Size ◽  
Average Latency ◽  
Overhead Ratio ◽  
Spray And Wait

Background: The opportunistic mobile networks (OMNs) are a type of mobile adhoc networks (MANETs) with delay-tolerant network (DTN) features, where the sender to receiver connectivity never exists most of the time, due to dynamic nature of the nodes and the network partition. The real use of OMNs is to provide connectivity in challenged environments. Methods: The paper presents the detailed analysis of three routing protocols, namely Epidemic, PROPHET and Spray and Wait, against variable size of the messages and the time to live (TTL) in the networks. The key contribution of the paper is to explore routing protocols with mobility models for the dissemination of data to the destination. Routing uses the store-carryforward mechanism for message transfer and network has to keep compromise between message delivery ratio and delivery delay. Results: The results are generated from the experiments with Opportunistic Network Environment (ONE) simulator. The performance is evaluated based on three metrics, the delivery ratio, overhead ratio and the average latency. The results show that the minimum message size (256 KB) offers better performance in the delivery than the larger message size (1 MB). It has also been observed that with the epidemic routing, since there are more message replicas, which in turn increase the cost of delivery, so with a smaller message, the protocol can reduce the overhead ratio with a high proportion. Conclusion: The average latency observed increases with the increase of the TTL of the message in three protocols with variation of the message size from 256KB to 1 MB.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Spray Based Routing Approaches in Delay Tolerant Networks

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sweta Jain ◽  
Meenu Chawla
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Delay Tolerant Networks ◽  
Delivery Ratio ◽  
Composite Methods ◽  
Average Latency ◽  
Delay Tolerant ◽  
Overhead Ratio ◽  
Spray And Wait

Delay Tolerant Networks (DTN) are mobile ad-hoc networks in which connections are often disruptive or discontinuous. Data forwarding using an appropriate routing strategy is a highly confronting issue in such networks. The traditional ad-hoc routing protocols which require end-to-end connectivity fail to function here due to frequent occurrences of network partitions. Spray and Wait (SaW) routing algorithm is a popular controlled replication based DTN protocol which provides a better delivery performance balancing the average delay and overhead ratio. An empirical analysis of various spray based approaches that have been proposed for DTN has been performed in this paper to compare and evaluate the basic Spray and Wait algorithms (Source Spray and Wait and Binary Sprayand Wait) with some of its major improvements (Spray andFocus, Average Delivery Probability Binary Spray and Wait and Composite methods to improve Spray and Wait). The main aim of this comparative study is to verify the effect of utility metrics in spray based routing protocols over simple spray based approaches. The ONE simulator has been used to provide a simulation environment to evaluate these algorithms and generate results. The performance metrics used are delivery ratio (DR), overhead ratio (OR) and average latency (ALat). The simulation results show that in terms of delivery ratio and average latency, Composite methods to improve Spray and Wait which incorporates delivery predictability metric in the wait phase and also acknowledgements to delete already deliveredmessages from a node’s buffer, outperforms all the other variants compared.

Study on Performance Comparison of OLSR and AODV Routing Protocols

2014 ◽  
Vol 672-674 ◽  
pp. 1977-1980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Ming Cheng ◽  
Jing Niu ◽  
Tie Jun Sun
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocol ◽  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Mobile Ad Hoc Network ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
Delivery Ratio ◽  
Centralized Control ◽  
Mobile Nodes ◽  
Routing Overhead

A Mobile Ad hoc network (MANET) is a network consisting of a set of wireless mobile nodes, in which nodes can communicate with each other without centralized control or established infrastructure. To obtain a better understanding of AODV (Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing Protocol) and OLSR (Optimized Link State Routing Protocol) routing protocols, different performances are simulated and analyzed using OPNET modeler 14.5 with the various performance metrics, such as PDR (Packet Delivery Ratio), end-to-end delay and routing overhead. Only effect of mobility is analyzed in the paper. As a conclusion, in mobility case, routing overhead is not greatly affected by mobility speed in AODV and OLSR, and the PDR of OLSR is decreased as the node speed increased, while AODV is not changed. As to delay, AODV is always higher than OLSR in both static and mobility cases.

scholarly journals Simulation based comparison of routing protocols in wireless multihop adhoc networks

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 3186
Author(s):  
Ali H. Wheeb ◽  
Marwa T. Naser
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
Traffic Load ◽  
Delivery Ratio ◽  
Mobile Nodes ◽  
End To End Delay ◽  
Simulation Based ◽  
End To End

Routing protocols are responsible for providing reliable communication between the source and destination nodes. The performance of these protocols in the ad hoc network family is influenced by several factors such as mobility model, traffic load, transmission range, and the number of mobile nodes which represents a great issue. Several simulation studies have explored routing protocol with performance parameters, but few relate to various protocols concerning routing and Quality of Service (QoS) metrics. This paper presents a simulation-based comparison of proactive, reactive, and multipath routing protocols in mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). Specifically, the performance of AODV, DSDV, and AOMDV protocols are evaluated and analyzed in the presence of varying the number of mobile nodes, pause time, and traffic connection numbers. Moreover, Routing and QoS performance metrics such as normalized routing load, routing packet, packet delivery ratio, packet drop, end-to-end delay, and throughput are measured to conduct a performance comparison between three routing protocols. Simulation results indicate that AODV outperforms the DSDV and AOMDV protocols in most of the metrics. AOMDV is better than DSDV in terms of end-to-end delay. DSDV provides lower throughput performance results. Network topology parameters have a slight impact on AODV Performance.

scholarly journals Distribution of Data Dissemination Model using DTN Routing Protocols

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 3014-3019
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocol ◽  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Buffer Capacity ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Data Dissemination ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Research Paper ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
Dtn Routing ◽  
The Impact

In this research paper compare the protocol’s performance together with the experimental results of optimal routing using real-life scenarios of vehicles and pedestrians roaming in a city. In this research paper, conduct several simulation comparison experiments(in the NS2 Software) to show the impact of changing buffer capacity, packet lifetime, packet generation rate, and number of nodes on the performance metrics. This research paper is concluded by providing guidelines to develop an efficient DTN routing protocol. To the best of researcher(Parameswari et al.,) knowledge, this work is the first to provide a detailed performance comparison among the diverse collection of DTN routing protocols.

scholarly journals Impact of buffer size and TTL on DTN routing protocols in intermittently connected mobile networks

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 1735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Sharif Hossen ◽  
Md. Masum Billah ◽  
Suraiya Yasmin
Keyword(s):  
Mobile Networks ◽  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Network Performance ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Limited Resources ◽  
Buffer Size ◽  
Delivery Ratio ◽  
Dtn Routing ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Intermittently Connected

Delay-Tolerant Networks (DTNs) are kinds of networks where there does not exist any complete end-to-end route from source to destination. Such networks can also be referred to as Intermittently Connected Mobile Networks (ICMNs), which are featured by asymmetric data rates, large delay, limited resources and high error rates. In this network, size of buffer and Time-to-Live (TTL) for fixed number of nodes and message generation rates contribute to the network performance because of limited resources and short life span of a packet in the net-work. Therefore, investigating efficient routing for altering TTL and size of buffer is very important for overall network performance. This paper presents a performance analysis based on simulation of the impact of buffer size and TTL for several DTN routing protocols in ICMNs scenario. ONE, i.e., Opportunistic Network Environment is used to simulate the routing protocols considering three performance metrics: delivery ratio, mean latency and overhead ratio. Investigated results mention that Spray-and-Focus (SNF) routing exhibits the best performance for altering TTL and size of buffer than other DTN routing protocols, i.e., Epidemic, PRoPHET, PRoPHETv2, MaxProp, RAPID, and Binary-SNW in the considered performance metrics and simulation scenario. 

scholarly journals MANET Routing Protocols Evaluation: AODV, DSR and DSDV Perspective

2018 ◽  
Vol 150 ◽  
pp. 06024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahad Taha AL-Dhief ◽  
Naseer Sabri ◽  
M.S. Salim ◽  
S. Fouad ◽  
S. A. Aljunid
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Mobile Ad Hoc Network ◽  
Access Point ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
Delivery Ratio ◽  
Network Simulator ◽  
Mobile Nodes ◽  
Performance Study ◽  
Distance Vector

Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) is a set of mobile nodes that communicate with each other to configure an immediate network without utilizing any of infrastructure, the centralized access point or centralized administration in multiple hop manner. There are a lot of routing protocols have been proposed in MANET which are different from each other in the performance and the mechanism. Therefore, the performance study of those protocols in different scenarios is needed. This paper presents the performance comparison between Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), Ad hoc on demand distance Vector Routing (AODV) as reactive routing protocols and Destination Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV) as a proactive routing protocol to precisely determine which protocol is more effective. Network Simulator (NS) version 2.35 has used to simulate and evaluate the performance of these protocols in terms of the packet delivery ratio, average throughput, average end-to-end delay, and packet loss ratio with respect to the variable number of nodes.

Research of Ad Hoc Network Routing Based on NS2 by Performance Comparison

2014 ◽  
Vol 989-994 ◽  
pp. 4633-4636
Author(s):  
Xiao Long Tan ◽  
Jia Zhou ◽  
Wen Bin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Ad Hoc Network ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Network Routing ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
Delivery Ratio ◽  
Routing Overhead ◽  
Packet Delivery ◽  
End To End Delay ◽  
Ns2 Simulation

In recent years,the ad hoc network has been paid extensive attention due to its characteristics of non-center and self-organization.Firstly this paper introduces three typical routing protocols AODV,DSDV,DSR,and the principles of them; then,adopts the NS2 simulation platform to simulate the performance of end-to-end delay,routing overhead and packet delivery ratio by changing the number of nodes and the paused time of nodes.Finally,by comparing the simulating results, the comparison conclusion is provided.

scholarly journals Performance Comparison of IACO,AODV Networking Routing Protocols

2011 ◽  
pp. 33-37
Author(s):  
Miss Shweta Mod ◽  
Mr. Jitendra Prithvira
Keyword(s):  
Ad Hoc Networks ◽  
Mobile Ad Hoc Networks ◽  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
Delivery Ratio ◽  
End To End Delay ◽  
Distance Vector ◽  
Mobile Ad Hoc ◽  
Hoc Networks

There are several standard protocols for Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) that have been developed for devices with higher computing features. The Efficient routing protocols can provide significant benefits to mobile ad hoc networks, in terms of both performance and reliability. Many routing protocols for such networks have been proposed so far. Amongst the most popular ones are Ad hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV), Improved Ant Colony Optimization (IACO). In this paper we present our observations regarding the performance comparison of the above protocols in mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). We perform extensive simulations, using NS-2 simulator. The Average end-to-end delay and the Packet Delivery Ratio have been considered as the two performance parameters

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document