Application of the Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation to Large Rotation and Large Deformation Problems

1998 ◽  
Vol 120 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Shabana ◽  
H. A. Hussien ◽  
J. L. Escalona

There are three basic finite element formulations which are used in multibody dynamics. These are the floating frame of reference approach, the incremental method and the large rotation vector approach. In the floating frame of reference and incremental formulations, the slopes are assumed small in order to define infinitesimal rotations that can be treated and transformed as vectors. This description, however, limits the use of some important elements such as beams and plates in a wide range of large displacement applications. As demonstrated in some recent publications, if infinitesimal rotations are used as nodal coordinates, the use of the finite element incremental formulation in the large reference displacement analysis does not lead to exact modeling of the rigid body inertia when the structures rotate as rigid bodies. In this paper, a simple non-incremental finite element procedure that employs the mathematical definition of the slope and uses it to define the element coordinates instead of the infinitesimal and finite rotations is developed for large rotation and deformation problems. By using this description and by defining the element coordinates in the global system, not only the need for performing coordinate transformation is avoided, but also a simple expression for the inertia forces is obtained. The resulting mass matrix is constant and it is the same matrix that appears in linear structural dynamics. It is demonstrated in this paper that this coordinate description leads to exact modeling of the rigid body inertia when the structures rotate as rigid bodies. Nonetheless, the stiffness matrix becomes nonlinear function even in the case of small displacements. The method presented in this paper differs from previous large rotation vector formulations in the sense that the inertia forces, the kinetic energy, and the strain energy are not expressed in terms of any orientation coordinates, and therefore, the method does not require interpolation of finite rotations. While the use of the formulation is demonstrated using a simple planar beam element, the generalization of the method to other element types and to the three dimensional case is straightforward. Using the finite element procedure presented in this paper, beams and plates can be treated as isoparametric elements.

Author(s):  
Ahmed A. Shabana ◽  
Hussien A. Hussien ◽  
José L. Escalona

Abstract There are three basic finite element formulations, which are used in multibody dynamics. These are the floating frame reference approach, the incremental method and the large rotation vector approach. In the floating frame of reference and incremental formulations, the slopes are assumed small in order to define infinitesimal rotations that can be treated and transformed as vectors. This description, however, limits the use of some important elements such as beams and plates in a wide range of large displacement applications. As demonstrated in some recent publications, if infinitesimal rotations are used as nodal coordinates, the use of the finite element incremental formulation in the large reference displacement analysis does not lead to exact modeling of the rigid body inertia when the structures rotate as rigid bodies. In this paper, a new and simple finite element procedure that employs the mathematical definition of the slope and uses it to define the element coordinates instead of the infinitesimal and finite rotations is developed for large rotation and deformation problems. By using this description and by defining the element coordinates in the global system, not only the need for performing coordinate transformation is avoided, but also a simple expression for the inertia forces is obtained. Furthermore, the resulting mass matrix is constant and it is the same matrix that appears in linear structural dynamics. It is demonstrated in this paper, that this coordinate description leads to exact modeling of the rigid body inertia when the structure rotate as rigid bodies. Nonetheless, the stiffness matrix becomes nonlinear function of time even in the case of small displacements. The method presented in this paper differs from previous large rotation vector formulations in the sense that the inertia forces, the kinetic energy, and the strain energy are not expressed in terms of any orientation coordinates, and therefore, the method does not require interpolation of finite rotations. While the use of the formulation is demonstrated using a simple planar beam element, the generalization of the method to other element types and to the three dimensional case is straightforward. Using the finite element procedure presented in this paper, beams and plates can be treated as isoparametric elements.


1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Shabana

In the dynamics of multibody systems that consist of interconnected rigid and deformable bodies, it is desirable to have a formulation that preserves the exactness of the rigid body inertia. As demonstrated in this paper, the incremental finite element approach, which is often used to solve large rotation problems, does not lead to the exact inertia of simple structures when they rotate as rigid bodies. Nonetheless, the exact inertia properties, such as the mass moments of inertia and the moments of mass, of the rigid bodies can be obtained using the finite element shape functions that describe large rigid body translations by introducing an intermediate element coordinate system. The results of application of the parallel axis theorem can be obtained using the finite element shape functions by simply changing the element nodal coordinates. As demonstrated in this investigation, the exact rigid body inertia properties in case of rigid body rotations can be obtained using the shape function if the nodal coordinates are defined using trigonometric functions. The analysis presented in this paper also demonstrates that a simple expression for the kinetic energy can be obtained for flexible bodies that undergo large displacements without the need for interpolation of large rotation coordinates.


Author(s):  
A. A. Shabana

Abstract In the dynamics of multibody systems that consist of interconnected rigid and deformable bodies, it is desirable to have a formulation that preserves the exactness of the rigid body inertia. As demonstrated in this paper, the incremental finite element approach, which is often used to solve large rotation problems, does not lead to the exact inertia of simple structures when they rotate as rigid bodies because the physical nodal coordinates can not be used to describe large rotations in the case of beams and plates. Nonetheless, the exact inertia properties, such as the mass moments of inertia and the moments of mass, of the rigid bodies can be obtained using the finite element shape functions that describe large rigid body translations by introducing an intermediate element coordinate system. The results of application of the parallel axis theorem can be obtained using the finite element shape functions by simply changing the element nodal coordinates. A simple rigid body rotation, however, can cause a significant error if the element shape function and the nodal coordinates are used to evaluate the inertia properties of bodies that undergo large rigid body rotations. As demonstrated in this investigation, the exact rigid body inertia properties in case of rigid body rotations can be obtained using the shape function if the nodal coordinates are defined using trigonometric functions that lack a physical meaning. Linearization of the nodal coordinate vector can lead to different results when different methods are used to define the rigid body inertia. For example, the calculation of the mass moment of inertia using position coordinates only leads to results which are different from those obtained using energy expressions or the laws of motion.


2017 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 1953-1968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Orzechowski ◽  
Marko K. Matikainen ◽  
Aki M. Mikkola

Author(s):  
Marcello Berzeri ◽  
Marcello Campanelli ◽  
A. A. Shabana

Abstract The equivalence of the elastic forces of finite element formulations used in flexible multibody dynamics is the focus of this investigation. Two conceptually different finite element formulations that lead to exact modeling of the rigid body dynamics will be used. These are the floating frame of reference formulation and the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. It is demonstrated in this study that different element coordinate systems, which are used for the convenience of describing the element deformations in the absolute nodal coordinate formulation, lead to similar results as the element size is reduced. The equivalence of the elastic forces in the absolute nodal coordinate and the floating frame of reference formulations is shown. The result of this analysis clearly demonstrates that the instability observed in high speed rotor analytical models due to the neglect of the geometric centrifugal stiffening is not a problem inherent to a particular finite element formulation but only depends on the beam model that is used. Fourier analysis of the solutions obtained in this investigation also sheds new light on the fundamental problem of the choice of the deformable body coordinate system in the floating frame of reference formulation. A new method is presented and used to obtain a simple expression for the elastic forces in the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. This method, which employs a nonlinear elastic strain-displacement relationship, does not result in an unstable solution when the angular velocity is increased.


Author(s):  
Y. F. Zhao ◽  
S. T. Tan ◽  
T. N. Wong ◽  
W. J. Chen

Abstract A constrained finite element method for modelling cloth deformation is developed. The bending deformation and the geometric constraint of developable surfaces of the cloth objects are considered. The representation of large rotation and the motion of rigid body are described using the current coordinates with the geometric constraint. The effectiveness of the present method is verified by comparing the thread deformation with the exact solution of catenary. Several examples are given to show that the proposed method converges quickly and is thus computationally efficient.


2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Zwölfer ◽  
Johannes Gerstmayr

AbstractThe Floating Frame of Reference Formulation (FFRF) is one of the most widely used methods to analyze flexible multibody systems subjected to large rigid-body motion but small strains and deformations. The FFRF is conventionally derived via a continuum mechanics approach. This tedious and circuitous approach, which still attracts attention among researchers, yields so-called inertia shape integrals. These unhandy volume integrals, arising in the FFRF mass matrix and quadratic velocity vector, depend not only on the degrees of freedom, but also on the finite element shape functions. That is why conventional computer implementations of the FFRF are laborious and error prone; they require access to the algorithmic level of the underlying finite element code or are restricted to a lumped mass approximation. This contribution presents a nodal-based treatment of the FFRF to bypass these integrals. Each flexible body is considered in its spatially discretized state ab initio, wherefore the integrals are replaced by multiplications by a constant finite element mass matrix. Besides that, this approach leads to a simpler and concise but rigorous derivation of the equations of motion. The steps to obtain the inertia-integral-free equations of motion (in 2D and 3D spaces) are presented in a clear and comprehensive way; the final result provides ready-to-implement equations of motion without a lumped mass approximation, in contrast to the conventional formulation.


Author(s):  
Karim Sherif ◽  
Hans Irschik ◽  
Wolfgang Witteveen

In multibody dynamics, the flexibility effects of each body are captured by using a linear combination of elastic mode shapes. If a co-rotational and co-translating frame of reference is used together with eigenvectors of the unconstraint body, which are free-surface modes, some spatial integrals in the floating frame of reference configuration do vanish. The corresponding coordinate system is the so-called Tisserand (or Buckens) reference frame. In the present contribution, a technique is developed for separating an arbitrary elastic mode shape into a pseudo-free-surface mode and rigid body modes. The generated pseudo-free-surface mode has most of the advantageous characteristics of a free-surface mode, and spans together with the rigid body modes the same solution space as it is spanned by the original mode shape. Due to the fact that, in the floating frame of reference configuration, the rigid body motions are already described by special generalized coordinates, only the resulting pseudo-free-surface modes are finally used to capture the flexibility effects of each body. A result of the generated pseudo-free-surface modes is that some of the spatial integrals do vanish and, thus, the equations of motion are significantly simplified. Two examples are presented in order to illustrate and to demonstrate the potential of the proposed method.


2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1601-1638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Omar ◽  
Ahmed A. Shabana ◽  
Aki Mikkola ◽  
Wei-Yi Loh ◽  
Rena Basch

Leaf springs are essential elements in the suspension systems of vehicles including sport utility vehicles, trucks, and railroad vehicles. Accurate modeling of the leaf springs is necessary in evaluating ride comfort, braking performance, vibration characteristics, and stability. In order to accurately model the deformations and vibrations of the leaf springs, nonlinear finite-element procedures, which account for the dynamic coupling between different modes of displacement, are employed. Two finite-element methods that take into account the effect of the distributed inertia and elasticity are discussed in this investigation to model the dynamics of leaf springs. The first is based on a floating frame of reference formulation, while the second is an absolute nodal coordinate formulation. The floating frame of reference formulation allows for using a reduced-order model by employing component mode synthesis techniques, while the absolute nodal coordinate formulation enables more detailed finite-element models for the large deformation of very flexible leaf springs. Methods for modeling the contact and friction between the leaves of the spring are discussed. A comparison is also presented between the results obtained using the proposed method and simplified approaches presented in the literature. While there are many issues that can be important in leaf spring modeling, the analysis presented in this paper is focused on a few key issues that include the computer implementation, the effect of the dynamic load on the spring stiffness, the selection of the vibration modes in the reduced-order model, and the effect of the structural damping on the response of the leaf spring.


Author(s):  
Xu Pei ◽  
Jingjun Yu ◽  
Shusheng Bi ◽  
Guanghua Zong

The Leaf-type Isosceles-Trapezoidal Flexural (LITF) pivot consists of two compliant beams and two rigid-bodies. For a single LITF pivot, the range of motion is small while the center-shift is relatively large. The capability of performance can be improved greatly by the combination of four LITF pivots. Base on the pseudo-rigid-body model (PRBM) of a LITF pivot, a method to construct the Quadri-LITF pivots is presented by regarding a single LITF pivot (or double-LITF pivot) as a the configurable flexure module. Ten types of Q-LITF pivots are synthesized. Compared with the single LIFT pivot, the stroke becomes larger, and stiffness becomes smaller. Four of them have the increased center-shift. The other four have the decreased center-shift. One of the quadruple LITF pivots is selected as the examples to explain the proposed method. The comparison between PRBM and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) result shows the validity and effectiveness of the method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document