Multibody Dynamics Incorporating Deployment of Flexible Structures

1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. S. K. Tadikonda ◽  
R. P. Singh ◽  
S. Stornelli
Keyword(s):  
Multibody Dynamics ◽  
Solution Method ◽  
Equations Of Motion ◽  
Flexible Structures ◽  
Open Loop ◽  
Space Structures ◽  
Shape Functions ◽  
Recursive Solution ◽  
Multi Body ◽  
Free Beam

The equations of motion for a flexible structure during deployment from and retraction into a base that is part of an open-loop multi-body chain are derived. The eigenfunctions of a fixed-free beam are used as the shape functions and their properties are exploited to express various domain integral terms as explicit functions of the instantaneous deployed length. The essential contributions of the present paper are the modeling of flexible body deployment with mass transfer and a recursive solution method for the dynamics. The deployment or retraction of space structures such as the SAFE Extension Mast can be simulated using this model. The model is presented in a format that is suitable for implementation in multibody dynamics codes.

Multibody Dynamics and Nonlinear Control of Flexible Space Structures

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1639-1661 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Suleman
Keyword(s):  
Nonlinear Control ◽  
Multibody Dynamics ◽  
Feedback Linearization ◽  
Equations Of Motion ◽  
Space Structures ◽  
Attitude Motion ◽  
Structural Flexibility ◽  
Large Space ◽  
Flexible Space Structures ◽  
Nonlinear Equations Of Motion

A multibody dynamics formulation for studying the response of large space structures with interconnected flexible bodies is presented. The use of system modes to model the structural flexibility results in a compact form of the nonlinear equations of motion. Next, the nonlinear control based feedback linearization technique is applied to effectively control the attitude motion of a flexible space platform. Using the original nonlinear dynamics of the multibody system, the controller determines the effort to effectively linearize the system and introduces a linear compensator to achieve the desired output in the presence of structural flexibility of the spacecraft.

scholarly journals On Equations of Motion of Elastic Linkages by FEM

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Michał Hać
Keyword(s):  
Rigid Body ◽  
Shape Function ◽  
Equations Of Motion ◽  
Vibrational Analysis ◽  
Open Loop ◽  
Rigid Body Motion ◽  
Body Motion ◽  
The Finite Element Method ◽  
Shape Functions ◽  
Flexible Mechanisms

Discussion on equations of motion of planar flexible mechanisms is presented in this paper. The finite element method (FEM) is used for obtaining vibrational analysis of links. In derivation of dynamic equations it is commonly assumed that the shape function of elastic motion can represent rigid-body motion. In this paper, in contrast to this assumption, a model of the shape function specifically dedicated to the rigid-body motion is presented, and its influence on elastic motion is included in equations of motion; the inertia matrix related to the rigid-body acceleration vector depends on both shape functions of the elastic and rigid elements. The numerical calculations are conducted in order to determine the influence of the assumed shape function for rigid-body motion on the vibration of links in the case of closed-loop and open-loop mechanisms. The results of numerical simulation show that for transient analysis and for some specific conditions (e.g., starting range, open-loop mechanisms) the influence of assumed shape functions on vibration response can be quite significant.

Time Integration Incorporated Sensitivity Analysis With Generalized-α Method for Multibody Dynamics Systems

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guang Dong ◽  
Zheng-Dong Ma ◽  
Gregory Hulbert ◽  
Noboru Kikuchi
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Topology Optimization ◽  
Dynamic Loading ◽  
Multibody Dynamics ◽  
Equations Of Motion ◽  
Time Integration ◽  
Optimization Method ◽  
Sensitivity Analysis Method ◽  
System Equations ◽  
Consecutive Time

The topology optimization method is extended for the optimization of geometrically nonlinear, time-dependent multibody dynamics systems undergoing nonlinear responses. In particular, this paper focuses on sensitivity analysis methods for topology optimization of general multibody dynamics systems, which include large displacements and rotations and dynamic loading. The generalized-α method is employed to solve the multibody dynamics system equations of motion. The developed time integration incorporated sensitivity analysis method is based on a linear approximation of two consecutive time steps, such that the generalized-α method is only applied once in the time integration of the equations of motion. This approach significantly reduces the computational costs associated with sensitivity analysis. To show the effectiveness of the developed procedures, topology optimization of a ground structure embedded in a planar multibody dynamics system under dynamic loading is presented.

scholarly journals Assessment of Linearization Approaches for Multibody Dynamics Formulations

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco González ◽  
Pierangelo Masarati ◽  
Javier Cuadrado ◽  
Miguel A. Naya
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical System ◽  
Multibody Dynamics ◽  
Equations Of Motion ◽  
Differential Algebraic Equations ◽  
Algebraic Equations ◽  
Practical Applications ◽  
Linearization Methods ◽  
Highly Nonlinear ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Way

Formulating the dynamics equations of a mechanical system following a multibody dynamics approach often leads to a set of highly nonlinear differential-algebraic equations (DAEs). While this form of the equations of motion is suitable for a wide range of practical applications, in some cases it is necessary to have access to the linearized system dynamics. This is the case when stability and modal analyses are to be carried out; the definition of plant and system models for certain control algorithms and state estimators also requires a linear expression of the dynamics. A number of methods for the linearization of multibody dynamics can be found in the literature. They differ in both the approach that they follow to handle the equations of motion and the way in which they deliver their results, which in turn are determined by the selection of the generalized coordinates used to describe the mechanical system. This selection is closely related to the way in which the kinematic constraints of the system are treated. Three major approaches can be distinguished and used to categorize most of the linearization methods published so far. In this work, we demonstrate the properties of each approach in the linearization of systems in static equilibrium, illustrating them with the study of two representative examples.

Recursive Linearization of Multibody Dynamics and Application to Control Design

1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsung-Chieh Lin ◽  
K. Harold Yae
Keyword(s):  
Multibody Dynamics ◽  
Equations Of Motion ◽  
Linear Equations ◽  
Control Design ◽  
Numerical Differentiation ◽  
Difficult Problem ◽  
Computational Method ◽  
Computational Error ◽  
Dynamics Modeling ◽  
Analytical Approximations

Abstract The non-linear equations of motion in multi-body dynamics pose a difficult problem in linear control design. It is therefore desirable to have linearization capability in conjunction with a general-purpose multibody dynamics modeling technique. A new computational method for linearization is obtained by applying a series of first-order analytical approximations to the recursive kinematic relationships. The method has proved to be computationally more efficient. It has also turned out to be more accurate because the analytical perturbation requires matrix and vector operations by circumventing numerical differentiation and other associated numerical operations that may accumulate computational error.

Flexible Multibody Dynamics Formulation by Hamilton’s Equations

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin M. Tong
Keyword(s):  
Multibody Dynamics ◽  
Multibody System ◽  
Mass Matrix ◽  
Equations Of Motion ◽  
Flexible Multibody Dynamics ◽  
Flexible Body ◽  
Flexible Multibody System ◽  
Generalized Coordinates ◽  
Flexible Multibody ◽  
The Matrix

Numerical solution of the dynamics equations of a flexible multibody system as represented by Hamilton’s canonical equations requires that its generalized velocities q˙ be solved from the generalized momenta p. The relation between them is p = J(q)q˙, where J is the system mass matrix and q is the generalized coordinates. This paper presents the dynamics equations for a generic flexible multibody system as represented by p˙ and gives emphasis to a systematic way of constructing the matrix J for solving q˙. The mass matrix is shown to be separable into four submatrices Jrr, Jrf, Jfr and Jff relating the joint momenta and flexible body mementa to the joint coordinate rates and the flexible body deformation coordinate rates. Explicit formulas are given for these submatrices. The equations of motion presented here lend insight to the structure of the flexible multibody dynamics equations. They are also a versatile alternative to the acceleration-based dynamics equations for modeling mechanical systems.

Vibrations of beams with a breathing crack and large amplitude displacements

2015 ◽  
Vol 230 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gonçalo Neves Carneiro ◽  
Pedro Ribeiro
Keyword(s):  
Time Domain ◽  
Equations Of Motion ◽  
Shape Functions ◽  
Breathing Crack ◽  
Dimensional Theory ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Time Histories ◽  
Linear Effects ◽  
Fourier Spectra ◽  
The Time Domain

The vibrations of beams with a breathing crack are investigated taking into account geometrical non-linear effects. The crack is modeled via a function that reduces the stiffness, as proposed by Christides and Barr (One-dimensional theory of cracked Bernoulli–Euler beams. Int J Mech Sci 1984). The bilinear behavior due to the crack closing and opening is considered. The equations of motion are obtained via a p-version finite element method, with shape functions recently proposed, which are adequate for problems with abrupt localised variations. To analyse the dynamics of cracked beams, the equations of motion are solved in the time domain, via Newmark's method, and the ensuing displacements, velocities and accelerations are examined. For that purpose, time histories, projections of trajectories on phase planes, and Fourier spectra are obtained. It is verified that the breathing crack introduce asymmetries in the response, and that velocities and accelerations can be more affected than displacements by the breathing crack.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document