Film Cooling Effectiveness for Injection from Multirow Holes

1979 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sasaki ◽  
K. Takahara ◽  
T. Kumagai ◽  
M. Hamano

Experimental results are presented for film cooling effectiveness with injection from both a single row and multiple rows of holes with spanwise hole-to-hole spacings of three hole diameters. In the multi-row cases, the injection holes were arranged in staggered patterns with streamwise row-to-row spacings of five or ten hole diameters. Adiabatic wall temperature distributions near and downstream of injection holes were well visualized using a scanning infrared camera. The effect of mainstream pressure gradient was partially included. The additive nature of multi-row film cooling was demonstrated experimentally, in agreement with the Sellers superposition model.

1978 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 303-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Y. Jabbari ◽  
R. J. Goldstein

Results of an experimental investigation of film cooling and heat transfer following injection through two staggered rows of holes are reported. The two staggered rows are considerably more effective in protecting the wall than a single row. The film cooling effectiveness at locations beyond about 30-hole dia downstream of injection is laterally uniform. The heat transfer coefficient is within a few percent of that without injection at low blowing rates, but it increases rapidly as the blowing rate increases above unity.


2006 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. 579-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah M. Coulthard ◽  
Ralph J. Volino ◽  
Karen A. Flack

The effect of an unheated starting length upstream of a row of film cooling holes was studied experimentally to determine its effect on heat transfer coefficients downstream of the holes. Cases with a single row of cylindrical film cooling holes inclined at 35deg to the surface of a flat plate were considered at blowing ratios of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5. For each case, experiments were conducted to determine the film-cooling effectiveness and the Stanton number distributions in cases with the surface upstream of the holes heated and unheated. Measurements were made using an infrared camera, thermocouples, and hot and cold-wire anemometry. Ratios were computed of the Stanton number with film cooling (Stf) to corresponding Stanton numbers in cases without film cooling (Sto), but the same surface heating conditions. Contours of these ratios were qualitatively the same regardless of the upstream heating conditions, but the ratios were larger for the cases with a heating starting length. Differences were most pronounced just downstream of the holes and for the lower blowing rate cases. Even 12 diameters downstream of the holes, the Stanton number ratios were 10–15% higher with a heated starting length. At higher blowing rates the differences between the heated and unheated starting length cases were not significant. The differences in Stanton number distributions are related to jet flow structures, which vary with blowing rate.


Author(s):  
Jeffrey P. Bons ◽  
Charles D. MacArthur ◽  
Richard B. Rivir

This study investigated the adiabatic wall cooling effectiveness of a single row of film cooling boles injecting into a turbulent flat plate boundary layer below a turbulent, zero pressure gradient freestream. Levels of freestream turbulence (Tu) up to 17.4% were generated using a method which simulates conditions at a gas turbine combustor exit. Film cooling was injected from a single row of five 35 degree slant-hole injectors (length/diameter = 3.5. pitch/diameter = 3.0) at blowing ratios from 0.55 to 1.85 and at a nearly constant density ratio (coolant density/freestream density) of 0.95. Film cooling effectiveness data is presented for Tu levels ranging from 0.9% to 17% at a constant freestream Reynolds number based on injection hole diameter of 19000. Results show that elevated levels of freestream turbulence reduce film cooling effectiveness by up to 70% in the region directly downstream of the injection hole due to enhanced mixing. At the same time, high freestream turbulence also produces a 50–100% increase in film cooling effectiveness in the region between injection boles. This is due to accelerated spanwise diffusion of the cooling fluid, which also produces an earlier merger of the coolant jets from adjacent holes.


1977 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 386-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Williams ◽  
W. H. Giedt

The adiabatic wall temperature distribution in nozzles with gas injection through a peripheral slot at the entrance was investigated. Experimental wall temperature distributions were measured in a series of hot gas (hydrogen-air combustion as the primary source) tests with three geometrically different channels—a constant area duct, a gradually converging nozzle, and a rapidly converging nozzle. Cooling effectiveness was found to be significantly higher for the rapidly converging geometry. Prediction of recovery temperature distributions under the test conditions with available boundary layer computer programs was then investigated. Predicted results were consistently higher than measured. Significantly improved agreement between predicted and measured results was achieved by introducing effective initial temperature profiles in the injectant to account for gross mixing between the injectant gas (nitrogen) and free stream gas at the injection station.


Author(s):  
Sarah M. Coulthard ◽  
Ralph J. Volino ◽  
Karen A. Flack

The effect of an unheated starting length upstream of a row of film cooling holes was studied experimentally to determine its effect on heat transfer coefficients downstream of the holes. Cases with a single row of cylindrical film cooling holes inclined at 35 degrees to the surface of a flat plate were considered at blowing ratios of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5. For each case experiments were conducted to determine the film cooling effectiveness and the Stanton number distributions in cases with the surface upstream of the holes heated and unheated. Measurements were made using an infrared camera, thermocouples, and hot and cold wire anemometry. Ratios were computed of the Stanton number with film cooling (Stf) to corresponding Stanton numbers in cases without film cooling (Sto) but the same surface heating conditions. Contours of these ratios were qualitatively the same regardless of the upstream heating conditions, but the ratios were larger for the cases with a heating starting length. Differences were most pronounced just downstream of the holes and for the lower blowing rate cases. Even 12 diameters downstream of the holes the Stanton number ratios were 10 to 15% higher with a heated starting length. The differences in Stanton number distributions are related to jet flow structures which vary with blowing rate.


1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 814-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Bons ◽  
C. D. MacArthur ◽  
R. B. Rivir

This study investigated the adiabatic wall cooling effectiveness of a single row of film cooling holes injecting into a turbulent flat plate boundary layer below a turbulent, zero pressure gradient free stream. Levels of free-stream turbulence (Tu) up to 17.4 percent were generated using a method that simulates conditions at a gas turbine combustor exit. Film cooling was injected from a single row of five 35 deg slant-hole injectors (length/diameter = 3.5, pitch/diameter = 3.0) at blowing ratios from 0.55 to 1.85 and at a nearly constant density ratio (coolant density/free-stream density) of 0.95. Film cooling effectiveness data are presented for Tu levels ranging from 0.9 to 17 percent at a constant free-stream Reynolds number based on injection hole diameter of 19,000. Results show that elevated levels of free-stream turbulence reduce film cooling effectiveness by up to 70 percent in the region directly downstream of the injection hole due to enhanced mixing. At the same time, high free-stream turbulence also produces a 50–100 percent increase in film cooling effectiveness in the region between injection holes. This is due to accelerated spanwise diffusion of the cooling fluid, which also produces an earlier merger of the coolant jets from adjacent holes.


AIAA Journal ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 708-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. ZAKKAY ◽  
CHI R. WANG ◽  
M. MIYAZAWA

Author(s):  
C. P. Lee ◽  
J. C. Han

The effect of heat transfer on film cooling has been studied analytically. The proposed model shows that the non-adiabatic film cooling effectiveness will increase with increasing of the heat transfer parameter, Ū / (ρVCp)2, on the convex, the flat and the concave walls over the entire range of film cooling parameter, X/MS. On the convex wall with a blowing rate, M, of 0.51 and a heat transfer parameter of 10−3 at the typical engine conditions, the non-adiabatic effectiveness can be higher than the adiabatic effectiveness by 45% at a film cooling parameter of 103; while the film temperature can be lower than the adiabatic wall by 18°C (32°F) at a dimensionless distance of 500. The model can be extended and applied to the heat transfer analysis for any kind of turbine blade with film cooling.


Author(s):  
M. Gritsch ◽  
A. Schulz ◽  
S. Wittig

This paper presents detailed measurements of the film-cooling effectiveness for three single, scaled-up film-cooling hole geometries. The hole geometries investigated include a cylindrical hole and two holes with a diffuser shaped exit portion (i.e. a fanshaped and a laidback fanshaped hole). The flow conditions considered are the crossflow Mach number at the hole entrance side (up to 0.6), the crossflow Mach number at the hole exit side (up to 1.2), and the blowing ratio (up to 2). The coolant-to-mainflow temperature ratio is kept constant at 0.54. The measurements are performed by means of an infrared camera system which provides a two-dimensional distribution of the film-cooling effectiveness in the nearfield of the cooling hole down to x/D = 10. As compared to the cylindrical hole, both expanded holes show significantly improved thermal protection of the surface downstream of the ejection location, particularly at high blowing ratios. The laidback fanshaped hole provides a better lateral spreading of the ejected coolant than the fanshaped hole which leads to higher laterally averaged film-cooling effectiveness. Coolant passage crossflow Mach number and orientation strongly affect the flowfield of the jet being ejected from the hole and, therefore, have an important impact on film-cooling performance.


2017 ◽  
Vol 139 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Rogers ◽  
Zhong Ren ◽  
Warren Buzzard ◽  
Brian Sweeney ◽  
Nathan Tinker ◽  
...  

Experimental results are presented for a double wall cooling arrangement which simulates a portion of a combustor liner of a gas turbine engine. The results are collected using a new experimental facility designed to test full-coverage film cooling and impingement cooling effectiveness using either cross flow, impingement, or a combination of both to supply the film cooling flow. The present experiment primarily deals with cross flow supplied full-coverage film cooling for a sparse film cooling hole array that has not been previously tested. Data are provided for turbulent film cooling, contraction ratio of 1, blowing ratios ranging from 2.7 to 7.5, coolant Reynolds numbers based on film cooling hole diameter of about 5000–20,000, and mainstream temperature step during transient tests of 14 °C. The film cooling hole array consists of a film cooling hole diameter of 6.4 mm with nondimensional streamwise (X/de) and spanwise (Y/de) film cooling hole spacing of 15 and 4, respectively. The film cooling holes are streamwise inclined at an angle of 25 deg with respect to the test plate surface and have adjacent streamwise rows staggered with respect to each other. Data illustrating the effects of blowing ratio on adiabatic film cooling effectiveness and heat transfer coefficient are presented. For the arrangement and conditions considered, heat transfer coefficients generally increase with streamwise development and increase with increasing blowing ratio. The adiabatic film cooling effectiveness is determined from measurements of adiabatic wall temperature, coolant stagnation temperature, and mainstream recovery temperature. The adiabatic wall temperature and the adiabatic film cooling effectiveness generally decrease and increase, respectively, with streamwise position, and generally decrease and increase, respectively, as blowing ratio becomes larger.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document