A Comprehensive Review of Thermal Enhanced Oil Recovery: Techniques Evaluation

2018 ◽  
Vol 141 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Esmail M. A. Mokheimer ◽  
M. Hamdy ◽  
Zubairu Abubakar ◽  
Mohammad Raghib Shakeel ◽  
Mohamed A. Habib ◽  
...  

The oil production from any well passes through three stages. The first stage is the natural extraction of oil under the well pressure, the second stage starts when the well pressure decreases. This second stage includes flooding the well with water via pumping sea or brackish water to increase the well pressure and push the oil up enhancing the oil recovery. After the first and secondary stages of oil production from the well, 20–30% of the well reserve is extracted. The well is said to be depleted while more than 70% of the oil are left over. At this stage, the third stage starts and it is called the enhanced oil recovery (EOR) or tertiary recovery. Enhanced oil recovery is a technology deployed to recover most of our finite crude oil deposit. With constant increase in energy demands, EOR will go a long way in extracting crude oil reserve while achieving huge economic benefits. EOR involves thermal and/or nonthermal means of changing the properties of crude oil in reservoirs, such as density and viscosity that ensures improved oil displacement in the reservoir and consequently better recovery. Thermal EOR, which is the focus of this paper, is considered the dominant technique among all different methods of EOR. In this paper, we present a brief overview of EOR classification in terms of thermal and nonthermal methods. Furthermore, a comprehensive review of different thermal EOR methods is presented and discussed.

Author(s):  
Abubaker H. Alagorni ◽  
◽  
Zulkefli Bin Yaacob ◽  
Abdurahman H. Nour ◽  
◽  
...  

RSC Advances ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 2578-2586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Wu ◽  
Hou-Feng Wang ◽  
Xian-Bin Wang ◽  
Hai-Yang Yang ◽  
Ru-Yi Jiang ◽  
...  

Due to the heterogeneity of rock layers, the poor volumetric sweep efficiency of water and an invalid cycle have emerged as major problems in crude oil production.


2017 ◽  
pp. 95-101
Author(s):  
V. V. Panikarovskii ◽  
E. V. Panikarovskii

A brief review of the work on intensifying the inflow and increasing the oil recovery of the Neocomian deposits of the Priobskoye field is expounded. The analysis of technologies for increasing oil recovery of AS10, AS11, AS12 is performed. The technology of hydraulic fracturing in production and injection wells and methods of selecting wells for hydraulic fracturing in the operational well stock of the Priobskoye field are considered. Based on the analysis of enhanced oil recovery technologies, the need for hydraulic fracturing in low-productivity reservoirs has been proved.


2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic Maubeuge ◽  
Danielle Christine Morel ◽  
Jean-Pierre Charles Fossey ◽  
Said Hunedi ◽  
Jacques Albert Danquigny

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tinuola Udoh

Abstract In this paper, the enhanced oil recovery potential of the application of nanoparticles in Niger Delta water-wet reservoir rock was investigated. Core flooding experiments were conducted on the sandstone core samples at 25 °C with the applications of nanoparticles in secondary and tertiary injection modes. The oil production during flooding was used to evaluate the enhanced oil recovery potential of the nanoparticles in the reservoir rock. The results of the study showed that the application of nanoparticles in tertiary mode after the secondary formation brine flooding increased oil production by 16.19% OIIP. Also, a comparison between the oil recoveries from secondary formation brine and nanoparticles flooding showed that higher oil recovery of 81% OIIP was made with secondary nanoparticles flooding against 57% OIIP made with formation brine flooding. Finally, better oil recovery of 7.67% OIIP was achieved with secondary application of nanoparticles relative to the tertiary application of formation brine and nanoparticles flooding. The results of this study are significant for the design of the application of nanoparticles in Niger Delta reservoirs.


Fuel ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 237 ◽  
pp. 1086-1107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cleverson Esene ◽  
Nima Rezaei ◽  
Amer Aborig ◽  
Sohrab Zendehboudi

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hemant Kumar Singh ◽  
Tapabrata Ray ◽  
Ruhul Sarker

In this paper, we discuss a practical oil production planning optimization problem. For oil wells with insufficient reservoir pressure, gas is usually injected to artificially lift oil, a practice commonly referred to as enhanced oil recovery (EOR). The total gas that can be used for oil extraction is constrained by daily availability limits. The oil extracted from each well is known to be a nonlinear function of the gas injected into the well and varies between wells. The problem is to identify the optimal amount of gas that needs to be injected into each well to maximize the amount of oil extracted subject to the constraint on the total daily gas availability. The problem has long been of practical interest to all major oil exploration companies as it has the potential to derive large financial benefit. In this paper, an infeasibility driven evolutionary algorithm is used to solve a 56 well reservoir problem which demonstrates its efficiency in solving constrained optimization problems. Furthermore, a multi-objective formulation of the problem is posed and solved using a number of algorithms, which eliminates the need for solving the (single objective) problem on a regular basis. Lastly, a modified single objective formulation of the problem is also proposed, which aims to maximize the profit instead of the quantity of oil. It is shown that even with a lesser amount of oil extracted, more economic benefits can be achieved through the modified formulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document