Acceptance Testing of Liquefied Natural Gas Compressors

Author(s):  
Roger Nyquist ◽  
Mike Andrews ◽  
Andrew Hunter ◽  
Oyuna Myagmar

The majority of natural gas compressors operate on gas mixtures with molecular weights (MW) less than air. For these machines, performance acceptance tests are run on air at reduced speed. For multistage compressors, each stage is tested individually. The test speeds and inlet temperatures are selected to closely match the inlet to exit density ratios and the machine Mach numbers per the ASME PTC10 test code. The specified test inlet pressure (limited by the test variable speed motor power capacity) is always high enough to assure that the test Reynolds number is above the required PTC10 minimum; the density ratio and machine Mach number do not depend on inlet pressure. The air test data is converted to the specified natural gas conditions using similarity laws, and an in-house stage matching program is used to determine the overall machine performance. For compressors used in liquefied natural gas (LNG) transport, the MW of the natural gas mixture is lower than air. However, the inlet temperatures are so low that an air test at typical ambient temperatures needs to be run at a speed higher than design to closely match density and machine Mach number ratios. It is impractical to run air tests at higher than design speeds (especially for 60 Hz machines), thus these machines are tested on air at design speed. As before, the air test data is reduced to the specified natural gas conditions using the similarity laws. An additional “compressibility” correction is made to account for the mismatch of density ratio between test and design conditions. Running a test at lower than the required PTC10 speed means that the test density ratio will be lower than the corrected density ratio and the stage would pass more flow than the test data conversion indicates. The method used to account for the density ratio mismatch, i.e. a “compressibility” correction is discussed in detail in this paper.

1985 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. Bass ◽  
E. B. Bowles ◽  
R. W. Trudell ◽  
J. Navickas ◽  
J. C. Peck ◽  
...  

This paper presents an overview of the current state-of-the-art in scale modeling of liquefied natural gas sloshing in ship tanks. The numerous potentially significant scaling parameters are discussed in detail and laboratory test data illustrating the effects of the important scaling parameters are presented. In view of current knowledge, an indication of appropriate scaling criteria is presented and recommendations for additional research efforts are outlined.


2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean Girdis ◽  
Stratos Tavoulareas ◽  
Ray Tomkins

Author(s):  
V.A. Yasashin ◽  
◽  
E.S. Gadylshina ◽  
A.S. Bolotokov ◽  
◽  
...  

Author(s):  
A. V. ZAGNIT'KO ◽  
◽  
N. P. ZARETSKIY ◽  
I. D. MATSUKOV ◽  
V. V. PIMENOV ◽  
...  

The high-response diagnostic complex for remote control and analyses of droplets and vapors of mazut, oil, gasoline, kerosene, diesel fuel and liquefied natural gas in the clouds and turbulent aerosolflows in the atmosphere with volume up to 107 m3 is described.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document