Traction Force Measurement During Collective Cell Migration Measured by Multichannel Micropillar Device

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiro Ohashi ◽  
Akito Sugawara
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Soft Lithography ◽  
Force Measurement ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Cell Movement ◽  
Traction Force ◽  
Collective Cell Migration ◽  
Maximum Magnitude ◽  
Traction Forces ◽  
Moving Front

Cell migration is essential for a variety of biological and pathological processes such as wound healing, inflammation and tumor metastasis. However, the mechanical environment within a group of cells during collective migration has not been well characterized. In this study, a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) multichannel device was fabricated using standard photolithography and soft lithography techniques and was used to monitor cellular traction forces during migration. A migration rate of 5.7 μm/h was measured in microchannels and leading cells in the moving front of the migration generated traction forces with a maximum magnitude of 14 nN at their front side. Traction forces generated by cells behind the leading cells directed forces backward at both the front and rear sides. However, traction forces generated by cells behind the second row had forces in random directions and with smaller magnitudes compared to those on the front and the second row. It is assumed that cells on the front line generated large traction forces and migrated actively as single cells, pulling adjacent cells forward, whereas the cell movement after the third row was restricted by mechanical linkages between their neighboring cells.

scholarly journals Self-organized cell migration across scales – from single cell movement to tissue formation

Development ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 148 (7) ◽  
pp. dev191767
Author(s):  
Jessica Stock ◽  
Andrea Pauli
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Multiple Scales ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Cell Movement ◽  
Biological Response ◽  
Collective Cell Migration ◽  
Theoretical Concepts ◽  
Self Organizing

ABSTRACTSelf-organization is a key feature of many biological and developmental processes, including cell migration. Although cell migration has traditionally been viewed as a biological response to extrinsic signals, advances within the past two decades have highlighted the importance of intrinsic self-organizing properties to direct cell migration on multiple scales. In this Review, we will explore self-organizing mechanisms that lay the foundation for both single and collective cell migration. Based on in vitro and in vivo examples, we will discuss theoretical concepts that underlie the persistent migration of single cells in the absence of directional guidance cues, and the formation of an autonomous cell collective that drives coordinated migration. Finally, we highlight the general implications of self-organizing principles guiding cell migration for biological and medical research.

scholarly journals Contact inhibition of locomotion probabilities drive solitary versus collective cell migration

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (88) ◽  
pp. 20130717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi A. Desai ◽  
Smitha B. Gopal ◽  
Sophia Chen ◽  
Christopher S. Chen
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
State Transition ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Cell Movement ◽  
Contact Inhibition ◽  
Collective Cell Migration ◽  
Collective Migration ◽  
Agent Based ◽  
Solitary Cell

Contact inhibition of locomotion (CIL) is the process whereby cells collide, cease migrating in the direction of the collision, and repolarize their migration machinery away from the collision. Quantitative analysis of CIL has remained elusive because cell-to-cell collisions are infrequent in traditional cell culture. Moreover, whereas CIL predicts mutual cell repulsion and ‘scattering’ of cells, the same cells in vivo are observed to undergo CIL at some developmental times and collective cell migration at others. It remains unclear whether CIL is simply absent during collective cell migration, or if the two processes coexist and are perhaps even related. Here, we used micropatterned stripes of extracellular matrix to restrict cell migration to linear paths such that cells polarized in one of two directions and collisions between cells occurred frequently and consistently, permitting quantitative and unbiased analysis of CIL. Observing repolarization events in different contexts, including head-to-head collision, head-to-tail collision, collision with an inert barrier, or no collision, and describing polarization as a two-state transition indicated that CIL occurs probabilistically, and most strongly upon head-to-head collisions. In addition to strong CIL, we also observed ‘trains’ of cells moving collectively with high persistence that appeared to emerge from single cells. To reconcile these seemingly conflicting observations of CIL and collective cell migration, we constructed an agent-based model to simulate our experiments. Our model quantitatively predicted the emergence of collective migration, and demonstrated the sensitivity of such emergence to the probability of CIL. Thus CIL and collective migration can coexist, and in fact a shift in CIL probabilities may underlie transitions between solitary cell migration and collective cell migration. Taken together, our data demonstrate the emergence of persistently polarized, collective cell movement arising from CIL between colliding cells.

scholarly journals Vinculin-dependent actin bundling regulates cell migration and traction forces

2015 ◽  
Vol 465 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karry M. Jannie ◽  
Shawn M. Ellerbroek ◽  
Dennis W. Zhou ◽  
Sophia Chen ◽  
David J. Crompton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Traction Force ◽  
Force Generation ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Traction Forces ◽  
Cell Matrix ◽  
Cell Cell

Vinculin transduces force and orchestrates mechanical signalling at cell–cell and cell–matrix adhesions. Cells expressing a mutant vinculin deficient in actin binding and bundling display migration and traction force defects. Vinculin binding to actin is critical for cell migration and force generation.

scholarly journals Tissue self-organization based on collective cell migration by contact activation of locomotion and chemotaxis

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (10) ◽  
pp. 4291-4296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taihei Fujimori ◽  
Akihiko Nakajima ◽  
Nao Shimada ◽  
Satoshi Sawai
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Cell Movement ◽  
Tissue Level ◽  
Cell Contact ◽  
Collective Cell Migration ◽  
Contact Activation ◽  
Membrane Recruitment ◽  
Cell Rearrangement ◽  
Cell Protrusion ◽  
Cell Cell

Despite their central role in multicellular organization, navigation rules that dictate cell rearrangement remain largely undefined. Contact between neighboring cells and diffusive attractant molecules are two of the major determinants of tissue-level patterning; however, in most cases, molecular and developmental complexity hinders one from decoding the exact governing rules of individual cell movement. A primordial example of tissue patterning by cell rearrangement is found in the social amoebaDictyostelium discoideumwhere the organizing center or the “tip” self-organizes as a result of sorting of differentiating prestalk and prespore cells. By employing microfluidics and microsphere-based manipulation of navigational cues at the single-cell level, here we uncovered a previously overlooked mode ofDictyosteliumcell migration that is strictly directed by cell–cell contact. The cell–cell contact signal is mediated by E-set Ig-like domain-containing heterophilic adhesion molecules TgrB1/TgrC1 that act in trans to induce plasma membrane recruitment of the SCAR complex and formation of dendritic actin networks, and the resulting cell protrusion competes with those induced by chemoattractant cAMP. Furthermore, we demonstrate that both prestalk and prespore cells can protrude toward the contact signal as well as to chemotax toward cAMP; however, when given both signals, prestalk cells orient toward the chemoattractant, whereas prespore cells choose the contact signal. These data suggest a model of cell sorting by competing juxtacrine and diffusive cues, each with potential to drive its own mode of collective cell migration.

scholarly journals Collective cell migration without proliferation: density determines cell velocity and wave velocity

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 172421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sham Tlili ◽  
Estelle Gauquelin ◽  
Brigitte Li ◽  
Olivier Cardoso ◽  
Benoît Ladoux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Cell Density ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Cell Monolayer ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Collective Cell Migration ◽  
Tumour Metastasis ◽  
Long Duration ◽  
Cell Velocity ◽  
Moving Front

Collective cell migration contributes to embryogenesis, wound healing and tumour metastasis. Cell monolayer migration experiments help in understanding what determines the movement of cells far from the leading edge. Inhibiting cell proliferation limits cell density increase and prevents jamming; we observe long-duration migration and quantify space–time characteristics of the velocity profile over large length scales and time scales. Velocity waves propagate backwards and their frequency depends only on cell density at the moving front. Both cell average velocity and wave velocity increase linearly with the cell effective radius regardless of the distance to the front. Inhibiting lamellipodia decreases cell velocity while waves either disappear or have a lower frequency. Our model combines conservation laws, monolayer mechanical properties and a phenomenological coupling between strain and polarity: advancing cells pull on their followers, which then become polarized. With reasonable values of parameters, this model agrees with several of our experimental observations. Together, our experiments and model disantangle the respective contributions of active velocity and of proliferation in monolayer migration, explain how cells maintain their polarity far from the moving front, and highlight the importance of strain–polarity coupling and density in long-range information propagation.

scholarly journals OS0712 Cell migration observation and traction force measurement using multichannel device

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (0) ◽  
pp. _OS0712-1_-_OS0712-2_
Author(s):  
Toshiro OHASHI ◽  
Akito SUGAWARA ◽  
Justin Cooper-White
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Force Measurement ◽  
Traction Force

scholarly journals Protein phosphatase 1 activity controls a balance between collective and single cell modes of migration

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yujun Chen ◽  
Nirupama Kotian ◽  
George Aranjuez ◽  
Lin Chen ◽  
C Luke Messer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Cell Junctions ◽  
Protein Phosphatase 1 ◽  
Collective Cell Migration ◽  
Border Cells ◽  
Border Cell ◽  
And Migration

Collective cell migration is central to many developmental and pathological processes. However, the mechanisms that keep cell collectives together and coordinate movement of multiple cells are poorly understood. Using the Drosophila border cell migration model, we find that Protein phosphatase 1 (Pp1) activity controls collective cell cohesion and migration. Inhibition of Pp1 causes border cells to round up, dissociate, and move as single cells with altered motility. We present evidence that Pp1 promotes proper levels of cadherin-catenin complex proteins at cell-cell junctions within the cluster to keep border cells together. Pp1 further restricts actomyosin contractility to the cluster periphery rather than at individual internal border cell contacts. We show that the myosin phosphatase Pp1 complex, which inhibits non-muscle myosin-II (Myo-II) activity, coordinates border cell shape and cluster cohesion. Given the high conservation of Pp1 complexes, this study identifies Pp1 as a major regulator of collective versus single cell migration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document