Perceptual restoration of interrupted speech in typically-developing school-age children: Effect of interruption rate

2018 ◽  
Vol 144 (3) ◽  
pp. 1964-1965
Author(s):  
Beula M. Magimairaj ◽  
Naveen K. Nagaraj
Keyword(s):  
School Age Children ◽  
School Age ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Interrupted Speech

scholarly journals Motor Contingency Learning and Infants with Spina Bifida

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather B. Taylor ◽  
Marcia A. Barnes ◽  
Susan H. Landry ◽  
Paul Swank ◽  
Jack M. Fletcher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spina Bifida ◽  
Sensory Feedback ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
School Age ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Contingency Learning ◽  
Motor Responses ◽  
Arm Reaching ◽  
Conjugate Reinforcement ◽  
Sensory Motor

AbstractInfants with Spina Bifida (SB) were compared to typically developing infants (TD) using a conjugate reinforcement paradigm at 6 months-of-age (n= 98) to evaluate learning, and retention of a sensory-motor contingency. Analyses evaluated infant arm-waving rates at baseline (wrist not tethered to mobile), during acquisition of the sensory-motor contingency (wrist tethered), and immediately after the acquisition phase and then after a delay (wrist not tethered), controlling for arm reaching ability, gestational age, and socioeconomic status. Although both groups responded to the contingency with increased arm-waving from baseline to acquisition, 15% to 29% fewer infants with SB than TD were found to learn the contingency depending on the criterion used to determine contingency learning. In addition, infants with SB who had learned the contingency had more difficulty retaining the contingency over time when sensory feedback was absent. The findings suggest that infants with SB do not learn motor contingencies as easily or at the same rate as TD infants, and are more likely to decrease motor responses when sensory feedback is absent. Results are discussed with reference to research on contingency learning in infants with and without neurodevelopmental disorders, and with reference to motor learning in school-age children with SB. (JINS, 2013,19, 1–10)

scholarly journals Syntactic Versus Memory Accounts of the Sentence Comprehension Deficits of Specific Language Impairment: Looking Back, Looking Ahead

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 1491-1504 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Montgomery ◽  
Ronald B. Gillam ◽  
Julia L. Evans
Keyword(s):  
Language Impairment ◽  
Specific Language Impairment ◽  
Sentence Comprehension ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
School Age ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Specific Language ◽  
Theoretical Perspectives ◽  
English Speaking ◽  
Proper Modification

Purpose Compared with same-age typically developing peers, school-age children with specific language impairment (SLI) exhibit significant deficits in spoken sentence comprehension. They also demonstrate a range of memory limitations. Whether these 2 deficit areas are related is unclear. The present review article aims to (a) review 2 main theoretical accounts of SLI sentence comprehension and various studies supporting each and (b) offer a new, broader, more integrated memory-based framework to guide future SLI research, as we believe the available evidence favors a memory-based perspective of SLI comprehension limitations. Method We reviewed the literature on the sentence comprehension abilities of English-speaking children with SLI from 2 theoretical perspectives. Results The sentence comprehension limitations of children with SLI appear to be more fully captured by a memory-based perspective than by a syntax-specific deficit perspective. Conclusions Although a memory-based view appears to be the better account of SLI sentence comprehension deficits, this view requires refinement and expansion. Current memory-based perspectives of adult sentence comprehension, with proper modification, offer SLI investigators new, more integrated memory frameworks within which to study and better understand the sentence comprehension abilities of children with SLI.

Children with SLI exhibit delays resolving ambiguous reference

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 180-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
JULIE M. ESTIS ◽  
BRENDA L. BEVERLY
Keyword(s):  
Word Learning ◽  
Language Impairment ◽  
Specific Language Impairment ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
School Age ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Typically Developing Children ◽  
Distinct Word ◽  
Phonological Activation ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACTFast mapping weaknesses in children with specific language impairment (SLI) may be explained by differences in disambiguation, mapping an unknown word to an unnamed object. The impact of language ability and linguistic stimulus on disambiguation was investigated. Sixteen children with SLI (8 preschool, 8 school-age) and sixteen typically developing age-matched children selected referents given familiar and unfamiliar object pairs in three ambiguous conditions: phonologically distinct word (PD), phonologically similar word (PS), no word (NW). Preschoolers with SLI did not disambiguate, unlike typically developing age-matched participants, who consistently selected unfamiliar objects given PD. School-age children with SLI disambiguated given PD. Delays in disambiguation for young children with SLI suggest limitations in processes that facilitate word learning for typically developing children. School-age children with SLI consistently selected familiar objects for PS, unlike typically developing children, suggesting differences in phonological activation for word learning.

scholarly journals 126: Sleep Efficiency is Associated with and Report Card Marks in Typically Developing School-Age Children

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. e80-e80
Author(s):  
R Gruber ◽  
G Somerville ◽  
P Enros ◽  
M Kestler ◽  
E Gillies-Poitras
Keyword(s):  
Report Card ◽  
Sleep Efficiency ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
School Age ◽  
Typically Developing

scholarly journals The Relationship Between Executive Functions and Language Abilities in Children: A Latent Variables Approach

2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 912-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margarita Kaushanskaya ◽  
Ji Sook Park ◽  
Ishanti Gangopadhyay ◽  
Meghan M. Davidson ◽  
Susan Ellis Weismer
Keyword(s):  
Latent Variables ◽  
Receptive Language ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
School Age ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Language Performance ◽  
Typically Developing Children ◽  
Language Abilities ◽  
Language Measures ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose We aimed to outline the latent variables approach for measuring nonverbal executive function (EF) skills in school-age children, and to examine the relationship between nonverbal EF skills and language performance in this age group. Method Seventy-one typically developing children, ages 8 through 11, participated in the study. Three EF components, inhibition, updating, and task-shifting, were each indexed using 2 nonverbal tasks. A latent variables approach was used to extract latent scores that represented each EF construct. Children were also administered common standardized language measures. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between EF and language skills. Results Nonverbal updating was associated with the Receptive Language Index on the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals–Fourth Edition (CELF-4). When composites denoting lexical–semantic and syntactic abilities were derived, nonverbal inhibition (but not shifting or updating) was found to predict children's syntactic abilities. These relationships held when the effects of age, IQ, and socioeconomic status were controlled. Conclusions The study makes a methodological contribution by explicating a method by which researchers can use the latent variables approach when measuring EF performance in school-age children. The study makes a theoretical and a clinical contribution by suggesting that language performance may be related to domain-general EFs.

scholarly journals Executive Function, Working Memory, and Verbal Fluency in Relation to Non-Verbal Intelligence in Greek-Speaking School-Age Children with Developmental Language Disorder

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 604
Author(s):  
Asimina M. Ralli ◽  
Elisavet Chrysochoou ◽  
Petros Roussos ◽  
Kleopatra Diakogiorgi ◽  
Panagiota Dimitropoulou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Verbal Fluency ◽  
Language Disorder ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
School Age ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Verbal Intelligence ◽  
Developmental Language Disorder ◽  
English Speaking ◽  
Digit Recall

Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) is often associated with impairments in working memory (WM), executive functions (EF), and verbal fluency. Moreover, increasing evidence shows poorer performance of children with DLD on non-verbal intelligence tests relative to their typically developing (TD) peers. Yet, the degree and generality of relevant difficulties remain unclear. The present study aimed at investigating WM capacity, key EFs and verbal fluency in relation to non-verbal intelligence in Greek-speaking school-age children with DLD, compared to TD peers (8–9 years). To our knowledge, the present study is the first to attempt a systematic relevant assessment with Greek-speaking school-age children, complementing previous studies mostly involving English-speaking participants. The results showed that children with DLD scored lower than TD peers on the non-verbal intelligence measure. Groups did not differ in the inhibition measures obtained (tapping resistance to either distractor or proactive interference), but children with DLD were outperformed by TD peers in the WM capacity, updating, monitoring (mixing cost), and verbal fluency (phonological and semantic) measures. The effects showed limited (in the case of backward digit recall) or no dependence on non-verbal intelligence. Findings are discussed in terms of their theoretical and practical implications as well as in relation to future lines of research.

scholarly journals Special Needs Assessment in Bilingual School-Age Children in Germany

Languages ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Irina Hertel ◽  
Solveig Chilla ◽  
Lina Abed Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Special Needs ◽  
Word Reading ◽  
Language Disorders ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Primary School Children ◽  
Refugee Children ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
School Age ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Refugee Students

Educational and (psycho-)linguistic research on L1 and L2 acquisition in bilingual children sketches them as a group of language learners varying in many aspects. However, most studies to date have based evaluations of language proficiency or new assessment tools on data from heritage children, while studies on the appropriateness of assessment tools for school-age refugee children remain a notable exception. This study focuses on the standardized assessment tool BUEGA for primary school children, which is, among others, a widespread tool for the assessment of pedagogical support or special needs (SN) in Germany. We compare the performance of 12 typically developing monolinguals (Mo-TD: 7;3–12;1), 14 heritage-bilinguals (BiTD: 7;1–13;4, L1 Turkish and Arabic), 12 refugee- students (BiTD: 8;7–13;1, L1 Arabic), and 7 children with developmental language disorders (DLD: 7;7–13;9) on the subtests of grammar, word-reading, and spelling. Overall results show that refugee-BiTDs perform in the (monolingual) pathology range. No significant differences emerged between students with DLD and typically developing (TD) refugee students. Considering the assessment of school-related language performance, bilingual refugees are at risk of misdiagnosis, along with the well-known effects of educational disadvantage. This particularly applies to children with low socioeconomic status (SES). Looking beyond oral language competencies and using test combinations can help exclude language disorders in school-age children with limited L2 proficiency.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document