scholarly journals Obstacles Adapted Physical Education Specialists Encounter When Developing Transition Plans

2000 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah L. Krueger ◽  
Patrick DiRocco ◽  
Manny Felix

The purpose was to ascertain what obstacles adapted physical education (APE) specialists in Wisconsin had encountered while developing physical activity leisure transition plans (LTP) in accordance with the PL 105-17 mandate on transition services. Also addressed were the reasons why some APE specialists had not written LTPs or been involved in transition planning. Participants included 155 APE specialists representing 91 school districts in Wisconsin who returned a mailed questionnaire (i.e., a 75% return rate). Results indicated that only 21% (n = 33) of the APE specialists had written a LTP. Sixty-four percent (n = 78) of the specialists who reported not having written a LTP said that they had never been asked to be part of transition planning. APE specialists who had written LTPs indicated that transportation, social isolation, and budget restrictions were the greatest barriers.

2015 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 543-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone José dos Santos ◽  
◽  
Carla Menêses Hardman ◽  
Simone Storino Honda Barros ◽  
Mauro Virgilio Gomes de Barros

2018 ◽  
Vol 112 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren J. Lieberman ◽  
T. Nicole Kirk ◽  
Justin A. Haegele

Introduction Children who are deafblind have unique educational needs, especially when it comes to developing a foundation for recreation. This foundation includes a well-rounded physical education program. Purpose The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of adults who are deafblind as they recall their involvement in physical education and transition planning relating to recreation. Methods A panel of experts validated a questionnaire related to participation in physical education, the Individual Education Program (IEP), and transition meetings. Individuals who are deafblind were interviewed at the Seabeck Deafblind Retreat and at the International Deafblind Expo in Orlando, Florida. Data were analyzed by demographics, frequency counts, and qualitative responses to the open-ended questions. Results The study had three major findings: (1) Most participants were involved in their IEP meetings, yet the physical education teacher was not included in these meetings and the need for physical education and accommodations during physical education were not typically addressed. (2) Most participants attended their transition meetings, yet most never discussed recreation or physical activity—let alone how to overcome barriers to their preferred activities. (3) The majority of participants revealed that they are currently not involved in the recreation activities that they want to be. They expressed dissatisfaction with the support they received in the transition process that would have enhanced quality recreation in their lives. Discussion Based on the results presented here, participants were dissatisfied with the lack of physical education teacher involvement with IEP meetings and the limited discussion of recreation and physical activity during transition, which may have caused them to be less prepared for engagement in physical activity and recreation as adults than they might have been if more attention had been paid to these issues. Ensuring that professional preparation programs in both physical education and deafblind education emphasize the importance of modifications to the physical education curriculum as well as involvement of the whole multidisciplinary team in IEP meetings can set the student up for a successful adult life. Last, transition meetings should include the student's preferred recreation and physical activities as well as discuss the barriers to those activities. Including these topics in every transition meeting may help adolescents who are deafblind navigate their preferred recreation activities in their future. Implications for practitioners Training for current interveners and deafblind specialists should include ideas for modification to physical education. In addition, training for physical education teachers should include how to modify activities for children and youths who are deafblind. Transition training programs throughout the United States should include information about the children's recreation interests (inside and outside of the home) as well as how to overcome barriers they may face in accessing those choices.


1995 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-52
Author(s):  
Tami Benham-Deal

The purpose of this study was to examine Adapted Physical Education (APE) practices in a rural state and to determine the preservice and inservice needs of APE teachers in Wyoming. Of the state's 49 school districts 38 responded to a descriptive questionnaire. Results indicated that (a) many school districts did not offer APE programs; (b) minimal, if any, specialization was required of many APE teachers; (c) larger districts tended to employ APE teachers more frequently; and (d) there is considerable need for inservice training. It was concluded that APE practices in Wyoming, as well as the preservice and inservice programs offered at the state university, need to be carefully examined.


1993 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Porretta ◽  
John Nesbitt ◽  
Stan Labanowich

This article addresses the issue of terminology by discussing the terms adapted physical education, adapted physical recreation, adapted sport, and adapted physical activity. Reasons are presented which suggest that these terms, taken collectively, may best describe movement of a gross motor nature that pertains to individuals with disabilities. A terminology framework is then proposed that is based on both conceptual and practical programmatic considerations within the context of service delivery. This context utilizes all four of the above terms, which are presented within the notion of inclusion. The terms adapted physical education, adapted physical recreation, and adapted sport are conceptualized within the context of adapted physical activity. Within this service delivery context, adapted physical education refers to all curriculum-based instructional settings in educationally oriented environments, adapted physical recreation refers to activity in nonschool contexts, and adapted sport refers to high-level competition by elite performers under the governance of formal sport organizations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
June E. Gothberg ◽  
Gary Greene ◽  
Paula D. Kohler

Post-school outcomes are poor for youth with disabilities, in general, but even more discouraging for certain subpopulations of individuals with disabilities, particularly those from culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) backgrounds. The authors discuss structural inequalities in public schools which potentially contribute to the poorer transition outcomes of CLD youth with disabilities compared with their White peers with disabilities and identify 11 research-based practices (RBPs) for supporting CLD youth with disabilities and their families during the transition planning process. A study is subsequently described involving the development and implementation of a survey measuring the degree to which these 11 RBPs are being implemented in public school districts. The survey was administered during 2011 to 2016 to interdisciplinary transition teams representing more than 90 school districts in the United States who were attending state capacity-building transition services training institutes. Group consensus was sought on the 11 items appearing on the survey. Results from the study found that most school districts were not implementing any of the RBPs to any significant degree, school staff were in need of cultural competence professional development training, CLD families of transition-aged youth with disabilities lacked access to quality resources and supports, and CLD youth with disabilities lacked opportunities to strengthen their self-determination skills. Implications for practice and future research on this topic is presented and discussed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
Simone José dos Santos ◽  
Carla Menêses Hardman ◽  
Simone Storino Honda Barros ◽  
Carolina da Franca Bandeira Ferreira Santos ◽  
Mauro Virgilio Gomes de Barros

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document