Passion, Self-Esteem, and the Role of Comparative Performance Evaluation

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 881-894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frode Stenseng ◽  
Lina Harvold Dalskau
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Performance Evaluations ◽  
Performance Criteria ◽  
Comparative Performance ◽  
Activity Engagement

Two studies were conducted to investigate the paradoxical behavior of obsessively passionate individuals: they tend to continue involvement in their passion activity despite reporting the activity as a source of ill-being. We suggested that elevated self-esteem in activity engagement could be one such persistence-promoting factor. In Study 1, we found that obsessively passionate individuals reported lower levels of global self-esteem compared with harmoniously passionate individuals, whereas they reported similar levels of activity-related self-esteem. We suggest that this indicates that obsessively passionate individuals try to compensate for low global self-esteem by utilizing self-esteem contingencies in their passion activity. Study 2 showed that activity-related self-esteem among obsessively passionate individuals was found to be strongly related to comparative performance evaluations, whereas no such relationship was found among harmoniously passionate individuals. We suggest that self-esteem contingencies related to comparative performance criteria represent a persistence-promoting factor among obsessively passionate individuals.

Multidimensional performance evaluation styles: budget rigidity and discretionary adjustments

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keita Masuya ◽  
Eisuke Yoshida
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Empirical Analysis ◽  
Environmental Uncertainty ◽  
Two Dimensions ◽  
Performance Evaluations ◽  
Performance Criteria ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Ex Post ◽  
Performance Effects ◽  
The Empirical Analysis

Purpose This study aims to reconceptualize performance evaluation styles and reveal their performance effects. Design/methodology/approach Based on a literature review, this study conceptualizes performance evaluation styles on two dimensions: priority of budgetary targets when setting performance criteria and use of accounting information for ex-post performance evaluation. This study discusses two concepts – budget rigidity and discretionary adjustments – to explain these two dimensions, and their optimal combination is then investigated by considering environmental uncertainty. The empirical analysis uses survey data from Japanese firms. Findings The results indicate that suitable combinations of budget rigidity and discretionary adjustments differ depending on environmental uncertainty. As expected, a combination of lower budget rigidity and higher discretionary adjustments is optimal in an uncertain environment. Contrary to expectations, a combination of higher budget rigidity and higher discretionary adjustments is optimal in a stable environment. Moreover, higher discretionary adjustments complement budgetary targets’ motivational effects, regardless of environmental uncertainty. Originality/value This study’s theoretical and empirical analysis suggests that it is difficult to understand the performance implications of performance evaluation styles without recognizing their multidimensionality and interdependencies. Moreover, the results demonstrate that discretionary adjustments in budget-based performance evaluations seem to act rationally in practice.

Comparative Performance Evaluation of TCP with Identical and Cross-Variant Congestion Control

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 163
Author(s):  
Nahida Nigar
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Congestion Control ◽  
Transmission Control Protocol ◽  
Injection Rate ◽  
Transport Layer ◽  
Performance Criteria ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
Comparative Performance ◽  
Rate Adaptive ◽  
Tcp Vegas

The Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), a key functional building block of the Internet, operates as a rate-adaptive end-to-end protocol at the Transport Layer of the network protocol stack. It regulates the prevailing load conditions within the network by getting the source node to adapt the packet transfer rate in accord with the processing capacity of the receiver. The regulation is enforced by means of dropping of packets on the part of the receiver. The TCP sender then reduces the packet injection rate so as to allow the network to recover from congestion. The focus of this paper is performance evaluation of certain notable TCP congestion avoidance algorithms, namely, Vegas, Reno and New Reno. Specifically, a number of performance measures have been analysed based on ns-2 simulation data where the scenarios involved TCP flows operating with identical and cross-variant congestion control mechanisms. Congestion window behaviour, packet loss, throughput, transmission delay and jitter are the performance criteria studied with the setup mentioned. In the flows with identical variants, Vegas outperforms other TCP variants. However, TCP Vegas has been observed to contribute to unfair appropriation of the resources in the cross-variant setting.

A Method for Comparative Performance Evaluation of Structural Optimization Codes: Part I — Theory

1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Subbarayan ◽  
D. L. Bartel ◽  
D. L. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Nonlinear Programming ◽  
Structural Optimization ◽  
Design Optimization ◽  
Performance Criteria ◽  
Test Problems ◽  
Comparative Performance ◽  
Systematic Procedure ◽  
The Past ◽  
Evaluation Scheme

Abstract This paper presents a systematic procedure for the comparative performance evaluation of nonlinear programming codes intended for applications in structural optimization. Part I discusses the issues in the evaluation of nonlinear programming codes and proposes a performance evaluation scheme for structural optimization codes. Aspects of performance evaluation such as the choice of test problems and appropriate set of performance criteria for structural optimization codes are described. A procedure to analyze codes based on their observed geometric behavior for test problems is also presented. The proposed method is contrasted with studies conducted in the past for comparative performance evaluation of nonlinear programming codes. Part II presents an application of the theory described in part I to evaluate two design optimization codes.

A Method for Comparative Performance Evaluation of Structural Optimization Codes: Part II — Applications

1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Subbarayan ◽  
D. L. Bartel ◽  
D. L. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Nonlinear Programming ◽  
Structural Optimization ◽  
Design Optimization ◽  
Performance Criteria ◽  
Test Problems ◽  
Comparative Performance ◽  
Systematic Procedure ◽  
The Past ◽  
Evaluation Scheme

Abstract This paper presents a systematic procedure for the comparative performance evaluation of nonlinear programming codes intended for applications in structural optimization. Part I discusses the issues in the evaluation of nonlinear programming codes and proposes a performance evaluation scheme for structural optimization codes. Aspects of performance evaluation such as the choice of test problems and appropriate set of performance criteria for structural optimization codes are described. A procedure to analyze codes based on their observed geometric behavior for test problems is also presented. The proposed method is contrasted with studies conducted in the past for comparative performance evaluation of nonlinear programming codes. Part II presents an application of the theory described in part I to evaluate two design optimization codes.

Social and Temporal Comparisons as Moderators of Psychological Resources Associations With Wellbeing

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasida Ben-Zur
Keyword(s):  
Life Satisfaction ◽  
Positive Affect ◽  
Subjective Wellbeing ◽  
Social Comparisons ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Psychological Resources ◽  
Low Levels ◽  
Age Range ◽  
General Wellbeing

Abstract. The current study investigated the associations of psychological resources, social comparisons, and temporal comparisons with general wellbeing. The sample included 142 community participants (47.9% men; age range 23–83 years), who compared themselves with others, and with their younger selves, on eight dimensions (e.g., physical health, resilience). They also completed questionnaires assessing psychological resources of mastery and self-esteem, and three components of subjective wellbeing: life satisfaction and negative and positive affect. The main results showed that high levels of psychological resources contributed to wellbeing, with self-enhancing social and temporal comparisons moderating the effects of resources on certain wellbeing components. Specifically, under low levels of mastery or self-esteem self-enhancing social or temporal comparisons were related to either higher life satisfaction or positive affect. The results highlight the role of resources and comparisons in promoting people’s wellbeing, and suggest that self-enhancing comparisons function as cognitive coping mechanisms when psychological resources are low.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document