scholarly journals Global Biodiversity Conservation Priorities

Science ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 313 (5783) ◽  
pp. 58-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. M. Brooks ◽  
R. A. Mittermeier ◽  
G. A. B. da Fonseca ◽  
J. Gerlach ◽  
M. Hoffmann ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Brooks ◽  
Russell A. Mittermeier ◽  
Gustavo A.B. da Fonseca ◽  
John F. Lamoreux ◽  
Cristina G. Mittermeier ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Xiao ◽  
Chris Newman ◽  
Christina D. Buesching ◽  
David W. Macdonald ◽  
Zhao-Min Zhou

AbstractHere we document 47,381 individuals from 38 species, including 31 protected species sold between May 2017 and November 2019 in Wuhan’s markets. We note that no pangolins (or bats) were traded, supporting reformed opinion that pangolins were not likely the spillover host at the source of the current coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. While we caution against the misattribution of COVID-19’s origins, the wild animals on sale in Wuhan suffered poor welfare and hygiene conditions and we detail a range of other zoonotic infections they can potentially vector. Nevertheless, in a precautionary response to COVID-19, China’s Ministries temporarily banned all wildlife trade on 26th Jan 2020 until the COVID-19 pandemic concludes, and permanently banned eating and trading terrestrial wild (non-livestock) animals for food on 24th Feb 2020. These interventions, intended to protect human health, redress previous trading and enforcement inconsistencies, and will have collateral benefits for global biodiversity conservation and animal welfare.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (8-9) ◽  
pp. 2197-2219 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Sudhakar Reddy ◽  
V. S. Faseela ◽  
Anjaly Unnikrishnan ◽  
C. S. Jha

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-99
Author(s):  
W. D. Lubbe ◽  
Louis J. Kotzé

In the Anthropocene the loss of biodiversity is set to become increasingly critical. Our law and governance institutions have been unable to halt this worrying trend. One of the reasons for this regulatory deficiency is that global law and governance pertaining to biodiversity are fragmented. In response to the need for a greater integration of law and governance directed at the protection of an integrated biosphere and as a measure to counter fragmentation, we argue that global biodiversity law and governance should be based on the connectivity conservation approach. While the debate about connectivity could occur in various geographical contexts, we focus for our present purposes on regional biodiversity governance in Southern Africa. It is our central hypothesis that adopting a holistic approach to biodiversity conservation in this region might go a long way towards preventing the human encroachment on biodiversity that typifies the Anthropocene.


2020 ◽  
Vol 249 ◽  
pp. 108741
Author(s):  
Zhongde Huang ◽  
Yang Bai ◽  
Juha M. Alatalo ◽  
Zhangqian Yang

2007 ◽  
pp. 43-63
Author(s):  
G (Dick) Potts

2015 ◽  
pp. 180-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Carmen ◽  
Juliette C. Young ◽  
Allan Watt

1970 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-103
Author(s):  
Lina Chalise

Payment for Environmental Services (PES) in its preliminary stage is gaining much attention. The worth of many valuable environmental services is undermined from centuries due its free access. But now with the advancing time the blind conservation practices seem to be unreal. Thus, PES mechanism provides an attractive and convincing package in conservation and valuation of most of the indirect services of environment. This is a review article based on the introductory queries on emerging issue of valuation of environmental services via PES mechanism. Key Words: Environmental services, Global biodiversity, Conservation practices DOI: 10.3126/init.v2i1.2529 The Initiation Vol.2(1) 2008 pp99-103


2007 ◽  
Vol 85 (9) ◽  
pp. 1014-1014
Author(s):  
Kathryn E. Freemark ◽  
Mark Meyers ◽  
Denis White ◽  
Leanna D. Warman ◽  
A. Ross Kiester ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document