scholarly journals Two classes of extragenic suppressor mutations identify functionally distinct regions of the GroEL chaperone of Escherichia coli.

1994 ◽  
Vol 176 (21) ◽  
pp. 6558-6565 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Zeilstra-Ryalls ◽  
O Fayet ◽  
C Georgopoulos
Genetics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 143 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J Sandler ◽  
Hardeep S Samra ◽  
Alvin J Clark

Abstract First identified as an essential component of the ϕX174 in vitro DNA replication system, PriA has ATPase, helicase, translocase, and primosome-assembly activities. priA1::kan strains of Escherichia coli are sensitive to UV irradiation, deficient in homologous recombination following transduction, and filamentous. priA2::kan strains have eightfold higher levels of uninduced SOS expression than wild type. We show that (1) priA1::kan strains have eightfold higher levels of uninduced SOS expression, (2) priA2::kan strains are UVS and Rec−, (3) lexA3 suppresses the high basal levels of SOS expression of a priA2::kan strain, and (4) plasmid-encoded priA300 (K230R), a mutant allele retaining only the primosome-assembly activity of priA+, restores both UVR and Rec+ phenotypes to a priA2::kan strain. Finally, we have isolated 17 independent UVR Rec+ revertants of priA2::kan strains that carry extragenic suppressors. All 17 map in the C-terminal half of the dnaC gene. DnaC loads the DnaB helicase onto DNA as a prelude for primosome assembly and DNA replication. We conclude that priA's primosome-assembly activity is essential for DNA repair and recombination and that the dnaC suppressor mutations allow these processes to occur in the absence of priA.


mSphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert S. Brzozowski ◽  
Brooke R. Tomlinson ◽  
Michael D. Sacco ◽  
Judy J. Chen ◽  
Anika N. Ali ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Although many bacterial cell division factors have been uncovered over the years, evidence from recent studies points to the existence of yet-to-be-discovered factors involved in cell division regulation. Thus, it is important to identify factors and conditions that regulate cell division to obtain a better understanding of this fundamental biological process. We recently reported that in the Gram-positive organisms Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus, increased production of YpsA resulted in cell division inhibition. In this study, we isolated spontaneous suppressor mutations to uncover critical residues of YpsA and the pathways through which YpsA may exert its function. Using this technique, we were able to isolate four unique intragenic suppressor mutations in ypsA (E55D, P79L, R111P, and G132E) that rendered the mutated YpsA nontoxic upon overproduction. We also isolated an extragenic suppressor mutation in yfhS, a gene that encodes a protein of unknown function. Subsequent analysis confirmed that cells lacking yfhS were unable to undergo filamentation in response to YpsA overproduction. We also serendipitously discovered that YfhS may play a role in cell size regulation. Finally, we provide evidence showing a mechanistic link between YpsA and YfhS. IMPORTANCE Bacillus subtilis is a rod-shaped Gram-positive model organism. The factors fundamental to the maintenance of cell shape and cell division are of major interest. We show that increased expression of ypsA results in cell division inhibition and impairment of colony formation on solid medium. Colonies that do arise possess compensatory suppressor mutations. We have isolated multiple intragenic (within ypsA) mutants and an extragenic suppressor mutant. Further analysis of the extragenic suppressor mutation led to a protein of unknown function, YfhS, which appears to play a role in regulating cell size. In addition to confirming that the cell division phenotype associated with YpsA is disrupted in a yfhS-null strain, we also discovered that the cell size phenotype of the yfhS knockout mutant is abolished in a strain that also lacks ypsA. This highlights a potential mechanistic link between these two proteins; however, the underlying molecular mechanism remains to be elucidated.


1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1908-1914
Author(s):  
C Martin ◽  
S Okamura ◽  
R Young

The two large subunits of RNA polymerase II, RPB1 and RPB2, contain regions of extensive homology to the two large subunits of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. These homologous regions may represent separate protein domains with unique functions. We investigated whether suppressor genetics could provide evidence for interactions between specific segments of RPB1 and RPB2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A plasmid shuffle method was used to screen thoroughly for mutations in RPB2 that suppress a temperature-sensitive mutation, rpb1-1, which is located in region H of RPB1. All six RPB2 mutations that suppress rpb1-1 were clustered in region I of RPB2. The location of these mutations and the observation that they were allele specific for suppression of rpb1-1 suggests an interaction between region H of RPB1 and region I of RPB2. A similar experiment was done to isolate and map mutations in RPB1 that suppress a temperature-sensitive mutation, rpb2-2, which occurs in region I of RPB2. These suppressor mutations were not clustered in a particular region. Thus, fine structure suppressor genetics can provide evidence for interactions between specific segments of two proteins, but the results of this type of analysis can depend on the conditional mutation to be suppressed.


Genetics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 121 (4) ◽  
pp. 675-683
Author(s):  
A E Adams ◽  
D Botstein

Abstract A gene whose product is likely to interact with yeast actin was identified by the isolation of pseudorevertants carrying dominant suppressors of the temperature-sensitive (Ts) act1-1 mutation. Of 30 independent revertants analyzed, 29 were found to carry extragenic suppressor mutations and of these, 24/24 tested were found to be linked to each other. This linkage group identifies a new gene SAC6, whose product, by several genetic criteria, is likely to interact intimately with actin. First, although act1-1 sac6 strains are temperature-independent (Ts+), 4/17 sac6 mutant alleles tested are Ts in an ACT1+ background. Moreover, four Ts+ pseudorevertants of these ACT1+ sac6 mutants carry suppressor mutations in ACT1; significantly, three of these are again Ts in a SAC6+ background, and are most likely new act1 mutant alleles. Thus, mutations in ACT1 and SAC6 can suppress each other's defects. Second, sac6 mutations can suppress the Ts defects of the act1-1 and act1-2, but not act1-4, mutations. This allele specificity indicates the sac6 mutations do not suppress by simply bypassing the function of actin at high temperature. Third, act1-4 sac6 strains have a growth defect greater than that due to either of the single mutations alone, again suggesting an interaction between the two proteins. The mutant sac6 gene was cloned on the basis of dominant suppression from an act1-1 sac6 mutant library, and was then mapped to chromosome IV, less than 2 cM from ARO1.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document