scholarly journals Interdependence of Activation at rhaSR by Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein, the RNA Polymerase Alpha Subunit C-Terminal Domain, and RhaR

2000 ◽  
Vol 182 (23) ◽  
pp. 6774-6782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn C. Holcroft ◽  
Susan M. Egan

ABSTRACT The Escherichia coli rhaSR operon encodes two AraC family transcription activators, RhaS and RhaR, and is activated by RhaR in the presence of l-rhamnose. β-Galactosidase assays of various rhaS-lacZ promoter fusions combined with mobility shift assays indicated that a cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) site located at −111.5 is also required for full activation of rhaSR expression. To address the mechanisms of activation by CRP and the RNA polymerase α-subunit C-terminal domain (α-CTD) at rhaSR, we tested the effects of alanine substitutions in CRP activating regions 1 and 2, overexpression of a truncated version of α (α-Δ235), and alanine substitutions throughout α-CTD. We found that DNA-contacting residues in α-CTD are required for full activation, and for simplicity, we discuss α-CTD as a third activator of rhaSR. CRP and RhaR could each partially activate transcription in the absence of the other two activators, and α-CTD was not capable of activation alone. In the case of CRP, this suggests that this activation involves neither an α-CTD interaction nor cooperative binding with RhaR, while in the case of RhaR, this suggests the likelihood of direct interactions with core RNA polymerase. We also found that CRP, RhaR, and α-CTD each have synergistic effects on activation by the others, suggesting direct or indirect interactions among all three. We have some evidence that the α-CTD–CRP and α-CTD–RhaR interactions might be direct. The magnitude of the synergistic effects was usually greater with just two activators than with all three, suggesting possible redundancies in the mechanisms of activation by CRP, α-CTD, and RhaR.

2002 ◽  
Vol 184 (8) ◽  
pp. 2273-2280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel J. Savery ◽  
Georgina S. Lloyd ◽  
Stephen J. W. Busby ◽  
Mark S. Thomas ◽  
Richard H. Ebright ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Alanine scanning of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase α subunit C-terminal domain (αCTD) was used to identify amino acid side chains important for class I cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP)-dependent transcription. Key residues were investigated further in vivo and in vitro. Substitutions in three regions of αCTD affected class I CRP-dependent transcription from the CC(−61.5) promoter and/or the lacP1 promoter. These regions are (i) the 287 determinant, previously shown to contact CRP during class II CRP-dependent transcription; (ii) the 265 determinant, previously shown to be important for αCTD-DNA interactions, including those required for class II CRP-dependent transcription; and (iii) the 261 determinant. We conclude that CRP contacts the same target in αCTD, the 287 determinant, at class I and class II CRP-dependent promoters. We also conclude that the relative contributions of individual residues within the 265 determinant depend on promoter sequence, and we discuss explanations for effects of substitutions in the 261 determinant.


2000 ◽  
Vol 182 (12) ◽  
pp. 3529-3535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn C. Holcroft ◽  
Susan M. Egan

ABSTRACT The Escherichia coli rhaBAD operon encodes the enzymes for catabolism of the sugar l-rhamnose. FullrhaBAD activation requires the AraC family activator RhaS (bound to a site that overlaps the −35 region of the promoter) and the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP; bound immediately upstream of RhaS at −92.5). We tested alanine substitutions in activating regions (AR) 1 and 2 of CRP for their effect onrhaBAD activation. Some, but not all, of the substitutions in both AR1 and AR2 resulted in approximately twofold defects in expression from rhaBAD promoter fusions. We also expressed a derivative of the α subunit of RNA polymerase deleted for the entire C-terminal domain (α-Δ235) and assayed expression from rhaBAD promoter fusions. The greatest defect (54-fold) occurred at a truncated promoter where RhaS was the only activator, while the defect at the full-length promoter (RhaS plus CRP) was smaller (13-fold). Analysis of a plasmid library expressing alanine substitutions at every residue in the carboxyl-terminal domain of the α subunit (α-CTD) identified 15 residues (mostly in the DNA-binding determinant) that were important at both the full-length and truncated promoters. Only one substitution was defective at the full-length but not the truncated promoter, and this residue was located in the DNA-binding determinant. Six substitutions were defective only at the promoter activated by RhaS alone, and these may define a protein-contacting determinant on α-CTD. Overall, our results suggest that CRP interaction with α-CTD may not be required for rhaBAD activation; however, α-CTD does contribute to full activation, probably through interactions with DNA and possibly RhaS.


2003 ◽  
Vol 185 (17) ◽  
pp. 5148-5157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine M. Beatty ◽  
Douglas F. Browning ◽  
Stephen J. W. Busby ◽  
Alan J. Wolfe

ABSTRACT The cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) activates transcription of the Escherichia coli acs gene, which encodes an acetate-scavenging enzyme required for fitness during periods of carbon starvation. Two promoters direct transcription of acs, the distal acsP1 and the proximal acsP2. In this study, we demonstrated that acsP2 can function as the major promoter and showed by in vitro studies that CRP facilitates transcription by “focusing” RNA polymerase to acsP2. We proposed that CRP activates transcription from acsP2 by a synergistic class III mechanism. Consistent with this proposal, we showed that CRP binds two sites, CRP I and CRP II. Induction of acs expression absolutely required CRP I, while optimal expression required both CRP I and CRP II. The locations of these DNA sites for CRP (centered at positions −69.5 and −122.5, respectively) suggest that CRP interacts with RNA polymerase through class I interactions. In support of this hypothesis, we demonstrated that acs transcription requires the surfaces of CRP and the C-terminal domain of the α subunit of RNA polymerase holoenzyme (α-CTD), which is known to participate in class I interactions: activating region 1 of CRP and the 287, 265, and 261 determinants of the α-CTD. Other surface-exposed residues in the α-CTD contributed to acs transcription, suggesting that the α-CTD may interact with at least one protein other than CRP.


1995 ◽  
Vol 309 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
N J Savery ◽  
V A Rhodius ◽  
H J Wing ◽  
S J W Busby

Transcription activation at two semi-synthetic Escherichia coli promoters, CC(-41.5) and CC(-72.5), is dependent on the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) that binds to sites centred 41.5 and 72.5 bp upstream from the respective transcription startpoints. An UP-element that can bind the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase (RNAP) alpha-subunit was cloned upstream of the DNA site for CRP at CC(-41.5) and downstream of the DNA site for CRP at CC(-72.5). In both cases CRP-dependent promoter activity was increased by the UP-element, but CRP-independent activity was not increased. DNase I footprinting was exploited to investigate the juxtaposition of bound CRP and RNAP alpha-subunits. In both cases, CRP and RNAP alpha-subunits occupy their cognate binding sites in ternary CRP-RNAP promoter complexes. RNAP alpha-subunits can occupy the UP-element in the absence of CRP, but this is not sufficient for open complex formation. The positive effects of binding RNAP alpha-subunits upstream of the DNA site for CRP at -41.5 are suppressed if the UP-element is incorrectly positioned.


1999 ◽  
Vol 337 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma C. LAW ◽  
Nigel J. SAVERY ◽  
Stephen J. W. BUSBY

The Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) is a factor that activates transcription at over 100 target promoters. At Class I CRP-dependent promoters, CRP binds immediately upstream of RNA polymerase and activates transcription by making direct contacts with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit (αCTD). Since αCTD is also known to interact with DNA sequence elements (known as UP elements), we have constructed a series of semi-synthetic Class I CRP-dependent promoters, carrying both a consensus DNA-binding site for CRP and a UP element at different positions. We previously showed that, at these promoters, the CRP–αCTD interaction and the CRP–UP element interaction contribute independently and additively to transcription initiation. In this study, we show that the two halves of the UP element can function independently, and that, in the presence of the UP element, the best location for the DNA site for CRP is position -69.5. This suggests that, at Class I CRP-dependent promoters where the DNA site for CRP is located at position -61.5, the two αCTDs of RNA polymerase are not optimally positioned. Two experiments to test this hypothesis are presented.


2009 ◽  
Vol 168 (2) ◽  
pp. 352-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie Lamour ◽  
Lars F. Westblade ◽  
Elizabeth A. Campbell ◽  
Seth A. Darst

2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 304-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi Qu ◽  
Yiquan Zhang ◽  
Lei Liu ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Yanping Han ◽  
...  

Yersinia pestis is one of the most dangerous pathogens. The cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) is required for the full virulence of Y. pestis, and it acts as a transcriptional regulator to control a large regulon, which includes several virulence-associated genes. The regulatory action of CRP is triggered only by binding to the small molecule cofactor cyclic AMP (cAMP). cAMP is synthesized from adenosine triphosphate by the adenylyl cyclase encoded by cyaA. In the present work, the regulation of crp and cyaA by CRP was investigated by primer extension, LacZ fusion, electrophoretic mobility shift assay, and DNase I footprinting. No transcriptional regulatory association between CRP and its own gene could be detected under the growth conditions tested. In contrast, CRP bound to a DNA site overlapping the core promoter −10 region of cyaA to repress the cyaA transcription. The determination of cellular cAMP levels further verified that CRP negatively controlled cAMP production. Repression of cAMP production by CRP through acting on the cAMP synthesase gene cyaA would represent a mechanism of negative automodulation of cellular CRP function.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document