scholarly journals Catabolite Repression of Escherichia coli Biofilm Formation

2002 ◽  
Vol 184 (12) ◽  
pp. 3406-3410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra W. Jackson ◽  
Jerry W. Simecka ◽  
Tony Romeo
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cyclic Amp ◽  
Catabolite Repression ◽  
Biofilm Formation ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Camp Receptor Protein ◽  
Glucose Addition ◽  
Camp Receptor ◽  
Biofilm Development

ABSTRACT Biofilm formation was repressed by glucose in several species of Enterobacteriaceae. In Escherichia coli, this effect was mediated at least in part by cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein. A temporal role for cAMP in biofilm development was indicated by the finding that glucose addition after ∼24 h failed to repress and generally activated biofilm formation.

scholarly journals Regulation of ytfK by cAMP-CRP Contributes to SpoT-Dependent Accumulation of (p)ppGpp in Response to Carbon Starvation YtfK Responds to Glucose Exhaustion

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Meyer ◽  
Elsa Germain ◽  
Etienne Maisonneuve
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cyclic Amp ◽  
Catabolite Repression ◽  
Stringent Response ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Glucose Starvation ◽  
Camp Receptor Protein ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Camp Receptor ◽  
Glucose Availability

Guanosine penta- or tetraphosphate (known as (p)ppGpp) serves as second messenger to respond to nutrient downshift and other environmental stresses, a phenomenon called stringent response. Accumulation of (p)ppGpp promotes the coordinated inhibition of macromolecule synthesis, as well as the activation of stress response pathways to cope and adapt to harmful conditions. In Escherichia coli, the (p)ppGpp level is tightly regulated by two enzymes, the (p)ppGpp synthetase RelA and the bifunctional synthetase/hydrolase SpoT. We recently identified the small protein YtfK as a key regulator of SpoT-mediated activation of stringent response in E. coli. Here, we further characterized the regulation of ytfK. We observed that ytfK is subjected to catabolite repression and is positively regulated by the cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein (CRP) complex. Importantly, YtfK contributes to SpoT-dependent accumulation of (p)ppGpp and cell survival in response to glucose starvation. Therefore, regulation of ytfK by the cAMP-CRP appears important to adjust (p)ppGpp level and coordinate cellular metabolism in response to glucose availability.

scholarly journals Positive and Negative Transcriptional Regulation of the Escherichia coli Gluconate Regulon Gene gntTby GntR and the Cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP Receptor Protein Complex

1998 ◽  
Vol 180 (7) ◽  
pp. 1777-1785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert Peekhaus ◽  
T. Conway
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cyclic Amp ◽  
Catabolite Repression ◽  
Transcriptional Start Site ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Start Site ◽  
Camp Receptor Protein ◽  
Camp Receptor

ABSTRACT The gntT gene of Escherichia coli is specifically induced by gluconate and repressed via catabolite repression. Thus, gluconate is both an inducer and a repressor ofgntT expression since gluconate is a catabolite-repressing sugar. In a gntR deletion mutant, the expression of a chromosomal gntT::lacZ fusion is both high and constitutive, confirming that GntR is the negative regulator of gntT. Indeed, GntR binds to two consensus gnt operator sites; one overlaps the −10 region of the gntT promoter, and the other is centered at +120 with respect to the transcriptional start site. The binding of GntR to these sites was proven in vitro by gel redardation assays and in vivo by site-directed mutagenesis of the binding sites. Binding of GntR to the operators is eliminated by gluconate and also by 6-phosphogluconate at a 10-fold-higher concentration. Interestingly, when gntR deletion strains are grown in the presence of gluconate, there is a twofold decrease in gntTexpression which is independent of catabolite repression and binding of GntR to the operator sites. This novel response of gntRmutants to the inducer is termed ultrarepression. Transcription ofgntT is activated by binding of the cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein (CRP) complex to a CRP binding site positioned at −71 upstream of the gntT transcription start site.

scholarly journals The cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein complex functions both as an activator and as a corepressor at the tsx-p2 promoter of Escherichia coli K-12.

1991 ◽  
Vol 173 (17) ◽  
pp. 5419-5430 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Gerlach ◽  
L Søgaard-Andersen ◽  
H Pedersen ◽  
J Martinussen ◽  
P Valentin-Hansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cyclic Amp ◽  
Protein Complex ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Camp Receptor Protein ◽  
Complex Functions ◽  
P2 Promoter ◽  
Camp Receptor ◽  
K 12

scholarly journals Interplay between Cyclic AMP-Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein and Cyclic di-GMP Signaling in Vibrio cholerae Biofilm Formation

2008 ◽  
Vol 190 (20) ◽  
pp. 6646-6659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiunn C. N. Fong ◽  
Fitnat H. Yildiz
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Amp ◽  
Vibrio Cholerae ◽  
Transcriptome Analysis ◽  
Biofilm Formation ◽  
Matrix Proteins ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Camp Receptor Protein ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Camp Receptor ◽  
Biofilm Matrix

ABSTRACT Vibrio cholerae is a facultative human pathogen. The ability of V. cholerae to form biofilms is crucial for its survival in aquatic habitats between epidemics and is advantageous for host-to-host transmission during epidemics. Formation of mature biofilms requires the production of extracellular matrix components, including Vibrio polysaccharide (VPS) and matrix proteins. Biofilm formation is positively controlled by the transcriptional regulators VpsR and VpsT and is negatively regulated by the quorum-sensing transcriptional regulator HapR, as well as the cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein (CRP) regulatory complex. Transcriptome analysis of cyaA (encoding adenylate cyclase) and crp (encoding cAMP receptor protein) deletion mutants revealed that cAMP-CRP negatively regulates transcription of both VPS biosynthesis genes and genes encoding biofilm matrix proteins. Further mutational and expression analysis revealed that cAMP-CRP negatively regulates transcription of vps genes indirectly through its action on vpsR transcription. However, negative regulation of the genes encoding biofilm matrix proteins by cAMP-CRP can also occur independent of VpsR. Transcriptome analysis also revealed that cAMP-CRP regulates the expression of a set of genes encoding diguanylate cyclases (DGCs) and phosphodiesterases. Mutational and phenotypic analysis of the differentially regulated DGCs revealed that a DGC, CdgA, is responsible for the increase in biofilm formation in the Δcrp mutant, showing the connection between of cyclic di-GMP and cAMP signaling in V. cholerae.

scholarly journals Cyclic AMP Directly Activates NasP, an N-Acyl Amino Acid Antibiotic Biosynthetic Enzyme Cloned from an Uncultured β-Proteobacterium

2007 ◽  
Vol 189 (17) ◽  
pp. 6487-6489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Clardy ◽  
Sean F. Brady
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Cyclic Amp ◽  
Gene Sequence ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Environmental Dna ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Camp Receptor Protein ◽  
Nucleotide Binding Domain ◽  
Camp Receptor

ABSTRACT The cyclic AMP (cAMP)-dependent biosynthesis of N-acylphenylalanine antibiotics by NasP, an environmental DNA-derived N-acyl amino acid synthase, is controlled by an NasP-associated cyclic nucleotide-binding domain and is independent of the global cAMP signal transducer, cAMP receptor protein. A 16S rRNA gene sequence found on the same environmental DNA cosmid as NasP is most closely related to 16S sequences from β-proteobacteria.

scholarly journals The Cyclic AMP-Dependent Catabolite Repression System of Serratia marcescens Mediates Biofilm Formation through Regulation of Type 1 Fimbriae

2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (11) ◽  
pp. 3461-3470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric J. Kalivoda ◽  
Nicholas A. Stella ◽  
Dawn M. O'Dee ◽  
Gerard J. Nau ◽  
Robert M. Q. Shanks
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Amp ◽  
Serratia Marcescens ◽  
Catabolite Repression ◽  
Biofilm Formation ◽  
Carbon Sources ◽  
Enteric Bacteria ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Biofilm Development

ABSTRACT The mechanisms by which environmental carbon sources regulate biofilm formation are poorly understood. This study investigates the roles of glucose and the catabolite repression system in Serratia marcescens biofilm formation. The abilities of this opportunistic pathogen to proliferate in a wide range of environments, to cause disease, and to resist antimicrobials are linked to its ability to form biofilms. We observed that growth of S. marcescens in glucose-rich medium strongly stimulated biofilm formation, which contrasts with previous studies showing that biofilm formation is inhibited by glucose in Escherichia coli and other enteric bacteria. Glucose uptake is known to inversely mediate intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) synthesis through regulation of adenylate cyclase (cyaA) activity, which in turn controls fundamental processes such as motility, carbon utilization and storage, pathogenesis, and cell division in many bacteria. Here, we demonstrate that mutation of catabolite repression genes that regulate cAMP levels (crr and cyaA) or the ability to respond to cAMP (crp) confers a large increase in biofilm formation. Suppressor analysis revealed that phenotypes of a cAMP receptor protein (crp) mutant require the fimABCD operon, which is responsible for type 1 fimbria production. Consistently, fimA transcription and fimbria production were determined to be upregulated in a cyaA mutant background by using quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR and transmission electron microscopy analysis. The regulatory pathway by which environmental carbon sources influence cAMP concentrations to alter production of type 1 fimbrial adhesins establishes a novel mechanism by which bacteria control biofilm development.

scholarly journals Cyclic AMP (cAMP) Receptor Protein-cAMP Complex Regulates Heparosan Production in Escherichia coli Strain Nissle 1917

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (22) ◽  
pp. 7687-7696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huihui Yan ◽  
Feifei Bao ◽  
Liping Zhao ◽  
Yanying Yu ◽  
Jiaqin Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cyclic Amp ◽  
Carbon Sources ◽  
Coli Strain ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Upstream Region ◽  
Camp Receptor Protein ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Camp Receptor

ABSTRACTHeparosan serves as the starting carbon backbone for the chemoenzymatic synthesis of heparin, a widely used clinical anticoagulant drug. The availability of heparosan is a significant concern for the cost-effective synthesis of bioengineered heparin. The carbon source is known as the pivotal factor affecting heparosan production. However, the mechanism by which carbon sources control the biosynthesis of heparosan is unclear. In this study, we found that the biosynthesis of heparosan was influenced by different carbon sources. Glucose inhibits the biosynthesis of heparosan, while the addition of either fructose or mannose increases the yield of heparosan. Further study demonstrated that the cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein (CRP) complex binds to the upstream region of the region 3 promoter and stimulates the transcription of the gene cluster for heparosan biosynthesis. Site-directed mutagenesis of the CRP binding site abolished its capability of binding CRP and eliminated the stimulative effect on transcription.1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis was further performed to determine theEscherichia colistrain Nissle 1917 (EcN) heparosan structure and quantify extracellular heparosan production. Our results add to the understanding of the regulation of heparosan biosynthesis and may contribute to the study of other exopolysaccharide-producing strains.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document