scholarly journals Microbiology in Nursing and Allied Health (MINAH) Undergraduate Curriculum Guidelines: A Call to Retain Microbiology Lecture and Laboratory Courses in Nursing and Allied Health Programs †

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lourdes Norman-McKay ◽  
10.28945/4297 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 197-210
Author(s):  
Jyothi Thalluri ◽  
Joy Penman

Aim/purpose The purpose of this article is to discuss the psychosocial and emotional outcomes of an introductory health science workshop designed to support and assist incoming health science students before starting their university study.   Background For the past two decades, a South Australian university offered an on-campus face to face workshop titled ‘Preparation for Health Sciences’ to incoming first-year students from eleven allied health programs such as Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medical Imaging. While many were locals, a good number came from regional and rural areas, and many were international students also. They consisted of both on-campus and off-campus students.   The workshop was created as a new learning environment that was available for students of diverse age groups, educational and cultural backgrounds to prepare them to study sciences. The content of the four-day workshop was developed in consultation with the program directors of the allied health programs. The objectives were to: introduce the assumed foundational science knowledge to undertake health sciences degree; gain confidence in approaching science subjects; experience lectures and laboratory activities; and become familiar with the University campus and its facilities. The workshop was delivered a week before the orientation week, before first-year formal teaching weeks. The topics covered were enhancing study skills, medical and anatomical terminology, body systems, basic chemistry and physics, laboratory activities, and assessment of learning.   Methodology In order to determine the outcomes of the workshop, a survey was used requiring participants to agree or disagree about statements concerning the preparatory course and answer open-ended questions relating to the most important information learned and the best aspects of the workshop. Several students piloted this questionnaire before use in order to ascertain the clarity of instructions, terminology and statements. The result of the 2015-2018 pre- and post-evaluation showed that the workshop raised confidence and enthusiasm in commencing university and that the majority considered the workshop useful overall. The findings of the survey are drawn upon to examine the psychosocial and emotional impacts of the workshop on participants. Using secondary qualitative analysis, the researchers identified the themes relating to the psychosocial and emotional issues conveyed by the participants.   Contribution The contributions of the article are in the areas of improving students’ confidence to complete their university degrees and increasing the likelihood of academic success. Findings Of the 285 students who participated in the workshops from 2015 to 2018, 166 completed the survey conducted at the conclusion of the initiative, representing a 58% response rate. The workshops achieved the objectives outlined at the outset. While there were many findings reported (Thalluri, 2016), the results highlighted in this paper relate to the psychosocial and emotional impacts of the workshop on students. Three themes emerged, and these were Increased preparedness and confidence; Networking and friendships that enhanced support, and Reduced anxiety to study sciences. Some drawbacks were also reported including the cost, time and travel involved. Recommendations for practitioners Students found the introductory workshop to be psychosocially and emotionally beneficial. It is recommended that the same approach be applied for teaching other challenging fields such as mathematics and physics within the university and in other contexts and institutions. Recommendations for researchers Improving and extending the workshop to provide greater accessibility and autonomy is recommended. A longitudinal study to follow up the durability of the workshop is also proposed. Impact on society The impacts in the broader community include: higher academic success for students; improved mental health due to social networking and friendship groups and reduced anxiety and fear; reduced dropout rate in their first year; greater potential to complete educational degrees; reduced wastage in human and financial resources; and increased human capital. Future research Addressing the limitations of cost, time and travel involved, and following-up with the participants’ academic and workplace performance are future directions for research.


2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Barfield ◽  
M. Rhonda Folio ◽  
Eddie T. C. Lam ◽  
James J. Zhang

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 258-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob C. Lutter ◽  
Lillian V. A. Hale ◽  
Ginger V. Shultz

Graduate students play a critical role in undergraduate education at doctoral-granting institutions and yet their training is often brief and overgeneralized. Little is known about how they develop knowledge for teaching chemistry in this context. To further understand how graduate students develop knowledge for teaching, we used a questionnaire to measure pedagogical content knowledge of solution chemistry concepts. These concepts are revisited frequently in the undergraduate curriculum, particularly in laboratory courses where graduate students commonly teach. Questions were included to measure both the pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of graduate students with a range of teaching experience. Analysis revealed that graduate students’ content knowledge is stronger than their pedagogical content knowledge, which increases modestly with teaching experience. Interviews were performed with a subset of respondents to determine whether they interpreted the questions as intended and the source of knowledge they used in responding. The interviews revealed that graduate students relied heavily on their own experience as students rather than direct experience teaching solution chemistry concepts.


1997 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 16-17
Author(s):  
John T. Gorgone ◽  
Gordon Davis ◽  
J. Daniel Couger ◽  
David L. Feinstein ◽  
Herbert E. Longenecker

Gerodontology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastassia Kossioni ◽  
Jacques Vanobbergen ◽  
James Newton ◽  
Frauke Müller ◽  
Robin Heath

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Estes ◽  
Anna K.S. Jozwick ◽  
Jennifer E. Kerr

Using non-toxic craft items and disposable lab consumables, we have developed eight modules to teach fundamental, hands-on microbiology lab skills safely at home. These ‘crafty’ teaching modules can be paired with virtual instruction and/or data collected by an instructor to replicate a traditional unknown microbiology lab series. Materials and procedures used were carefully chosen to best mimic the texture of ‘media,’ represent microbial ‘diversity,’ assess aseptic technique, and produce analyzable data from results produced. Some protocols build upon and extend previously unpublished ideas, while others provide novel methods. The lab skills include proper PPE usage and basic biosafety, aseptic technique, microscopy and staining, streaking for isolation, spread plating, serial dilutions, filtering, disk diffusion method, and modeling an epidemic. Each protocol includes a student handout with background, videos of the methods performed with microbes, a rationale for the craft supplies and technique used, a video demonstration of the ‘crafty’ technique, and post-lab questions. This resource was developed for an undergraduate microbiology course and each lab is aligned with learning outcomes within American Society for Microbiology’s undergraduate curriculum guidelines. This work would also be useful for outreach and K-12 educators. The development of microbiology lab skills by all students, regardless of economic or health status, will lead to a more scientifically minded society.


2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-72
Author(s):  
Martin Kapitán ◽  
Lenka Vavřičková ◽  
Jakub Suchánek

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the perception of undergraduate dentistry students at Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, the Czech Republic regarding their endodontic education within the context of the Undergraduate Curriculum Guidelines for Endodontology by the European Society of Endodontology (ESE). The secondary aim was to compare this perception among students in the Czech and English groups. Methodology: A questionnaire survey was conducted among fifth year students at the very end of their studies. Results: The students returned 60 filled questionnaires, making the response rate of 75.9%. More than two thirds of the respondents declared that they were competent at or had knowledge of most of the major competencies defined by the ESE. Eighty seven percent of respondents felt competent to perform a root canal treatment on anterior teeth; 86.7% on premolars; and 48.3% on molars. Nearly all respondents (98.3%) recommended more opportunities to practice on patients. Conclusions: The overall perception of the students was that their endodontic education was sufficient and largely conformed to the guidelines. Insufficient exposure to endodontic practice on patients was identified as a deficiency. There were no significant differences in perceptions between the two study groups.


2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Lawson ◽  
Debra L. Reisinger ◽  
Mary Kay Jordan-Fleming

Information about the undergraduate psychology courses preferred by graduate programs is useful for a number of purposes, including (a) advising psychology majors who are interested in graduate school, (b) undergraduate curriculum planning, and (c) examining whether graduate programs’ preferences reflect national guidelines for the undergraduate psychology curriculum. The authors examined the undergraduate course preferences of U.S. psychology graduate programs ( N = 548). Among Clinical/Counseling (C/C) programs, PsyD programs’ course preferences were more likely than those of master’s and PhD programs to reflect national undergraduate curriculum guidelines. Differences also emerged among various types of training (e.g., C/C vs. Educational/School), and these are important for advisors and students to understand.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document