scholarly journals The Avian Retrovirus Avian Sarcoma/Leukosis Virus Subtype A Reaches the Lipid Mixing Stage of Fusion at Neutral pH

2003 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 3058-3066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie J. Earp ◽  
Sue E. Delos ◽  
Robert C. Netter ◽  
Paul Bates ◽  
Judith M. White
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fusion ◽  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Low Ph ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Neutral Ph ◽  
Subtype A ◽  
Avian Sarcoma ◽  
Virus Subtype ◽  
Cell Cell

ABSTRACT We previously showed that the envelope glycoprotein (EnvA) of avian sarcoma/leukosis virus subtype A (ASLV-A) binds to liposomes at neutral pH following incubation with its receptor, Tva, at ≥22°C. We also provided evidence that ASLV-C fuses with cells at neutral pH. These findings suggested that receptor binding at neutral pH and ≥22°C is sufficient to activate Env for fusion. A recent study suggested that two steps are necessary to activate avian retroviral Envs: receptor binding at neutral pH, followed by exposure to low pH (W. Mothes et al., Cell 103:679-689, 2000). Therefore, we evaluated the requirements for intact ASLV-A particles to bind to target bilayers and fuse with cells. We found that ASLV-A particles bind stably to liposomes in a receptor- and temperature-dependent manner at neutral pH. Using ASLV-A particles biosynthetically labeled with pyrene, we found that ASLV-A mixes its lipid envelope with cells within 5 to 10 min at 37°C. Lipid mixing was neither inhibited nor enhanced by incubation at low pH. Lipid mixing of ASLV-A was inhibited by a peptide designed to prevent six-helix bundle formation in EnvA; the same peptide inhibits virus infection and EnvA-mediated cell-cell fusion (at both neutral and low pHs). Bafilomycin and dominant-negative dynamin inhibited lipid mixing of Sindbis virus (which requires low pH for fusion), but not of ASLV-A, with host cells. Finally, we found that, although EnvA-induced cell-cell fusion is enhanced at low pH, a mutant EnvA that is severely compromised in its ability to support infection still induced massive syncytia at low pH. Our results indicate that receptor binding at neutral pH is sufficient to activate EnvA, such that ASLV-A particles bind hydrophobically to and merge their membranes with target cells. Possible roles for low pH at subsequent stages of viral entry are discussed.

scholarly journals Low pH Is Required for Avian Sarcoma and Leukosis Virus Env-Induced Hemifusion and Fusion Pore Formation but Not for Pore Growth

2004 ◽  
Vol 78 (7) ◽  
pp. 3753-3762 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. B. Melikyan ◽  
R. J. O. Barnard ◽  
R. M. Markosyan ◽  
J. A. T. Young ◽  
F. S. Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Pore Formation ◽  
Low Ph ◽  
Soluble Form ◽  
Fusion Pore ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Neutral Ph ◽  
Triggered Reaction ◽  
Avian Sarcoma ◽  
Cell Cell

ABSTRACT Binding of avian sarcoma and leukosis virus (ASLV) to its cognate receptor on the cell surface causes conformational changes in its envelope protein (Env). It is currently debated whether low pH is required for ASLV infection. To elucidate the role of low pH, we studied the association between ASLV subgroup B (ASLV-B) and liposomes and fusion between effector cells expressing Env from ASLV-A and ASLV-B and target cells expressing cognate receptors. Neither EnvA nor EnvB promoted cell-cell fusion at neutral pH, but lowering the pH resulted in quick and extensive fusion. As expected for a low-pH-triggered reaction, fusion was a steep function of pH. Steps that required low pH were identified. Binding a soluble form of the receptor caused ASLV-B to hydrophobically associate with liposome membranes at neutral pH, indicating that low pH is not required for insertion of Env's fusion peptides into membranes. But both cell-cell hemifusion and fusion pore formation were pH dependent. It is proposed that fusion peptide insertion stabilizes the conformation of ASLV Env into a form that can be acted upon by low pH. At this point, but not before, low pH can induce fusion and is in fact required for fusion to occur. However, low pH is no longer necessary after formation of the initial fusion pore: pore enlargement does not require low pH.

scholarly journals Endosomal Proteolysis by Cathepsins Is Necessary for Murine Coronavirus Mouse Hepatitis Virus Type 2 Spike-Mediated Entry

2006 ◽  
Vol 80 (12) ◽  
pp. 5768-5776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaozhu Qiu ◽  
Susan T. Hingley ◽  
Graham Simmons ◽  
Christopher Yu ◽  
Jayasri Das Sarma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fusion ◽  
Ammonium Chloride ◽  
Hepatitis Virus ◽  
Mouse Hepatitis Virus ◽  
Low Ph ◽  
Ph Values ◽  
Neutral Ph ◽  
Cell Cell ◽  
Murine Coronavirus

ABSTRACT Most strains of murine coronavirus mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) express a cleavable spike glycoprotein that mediates viral entry and pH-independent cell-cell fusion. The MHV type 2 (MHV-2) strain of murine coronavirus differs from other strains in that it expresses an uncleaved spike and cannot induce cell-cell fusion at neutral pH values. We show here that while infection of the prototype MHV-A59 strain is not sensitive to pretreatment with lysosomotropic agents, MHV-2 replication is significantly inhibited by these agents. By use of an A59/MHV-2 chimeric virus, the susceptibility to lysosomotropic agents is mapped to the MHV-2 spike, suggesting a requirement of acidification of endosomes for MHV-2 spike-mediated entry. However, acidification is likely not a direct trigger for MHV-2 spike-mediated membrane fusion, as low-pH treatment is unable to overcome ammonium chloride inhibition, and it also cannot induce cell-cell fusion between MHV-2-infected cells. In contrast, trypsin treatment can both overcome ammonium chloride inhibition and promote cell-cell fusion. Inhibitors of the endosomal cysteine proteases cathepsin B and cathepsin L greatly reduce MHV-2 spike-mediated entry, while they have little effect on A59 entry, suggesting that there is a proteolytic step in MHV-2 entry. Finally, a recombinant virus expressing a cleaved MHV-2 spike has the ability to induce cell-cell fusion at neutral pH values and does not require low pH and endosomal cathepsins during infection. These studies demonstrate that endosomal proteolysis by cathepsins is necessary for MHV-2 spike-mediated entry; this is similar to the entry pathway recently described for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and indicates that coronaviruses may use multiple pathways for entry.

scholarly journals Fragments of Target Cells are Internalized into Retroviral Envelope Protein-Expressing Cells during Cell-Cell Fusion by Endocytosis

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mai Izumida ◽  
Haruka Kamiyama ◽  
Takashi Suematsu ◽  
Eri Honda ◽  
Yosuke Koizumi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fusion ◽  
Envelope Protein ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Cell Cell

scholarly journals Virus-Mediated Cell-Cell Fusion

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (24) ◽  
pp. 9644
Author(s):  
Héloïse Leroy ◽  
Mingyu Han ◽  
Marie Woottum ◽  
Lucie Bracq ◽  
Jérôme Bouchet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fusion ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Human Pathogens ◽  
General Process ◽  
Tissue Organization ◽  
Donor Cells ◽  
Infected Cells ◽  
Cell Cell

Cell-cell fusion between eukaryotic cells is a general process involved in many physiological and pathological conditions, including infections by bacteria, parasites, and viruses. As obligate intracellular pathogens, viruses use intracellular machineries and pathways for efficient replication in their host target cells. Interestingly, certain viruses, and, more especially, enveloped viruses belonging to different viral families and including human pathogens, can mediate cell-cell fusion between infected cells and neighboring non-infected cells. Depending of the cellular environment and tissue organization, this virus-mediated cell-cell fusion leads to the merge of membrane and cytoplasm contents and formation of multinucleated cells, also called syncytia, that can express high amount of viral antigens in tissues and organs of infected hosts. This ability of some viruses to trigger cell-cell fusion between infected cells as virus-donor cells and surrounding non-infected target cells is mainly related to virus-encoded fusion proteins, known as viral fusogens displaying high fusogenic properties, and expressed at the cell surface of the virus-donor cells. Virus-induced cell-cell fusion is then mediated by interactions of these viral fusion proteins with surface molecules or receptors involved in virus entry and expressed on neighboring non-infected cells. Thus, the goal of this review is to give an overview of the different animal virus families, with a more special focus on human pathogens, that can trigger cell-cell fusion.

scholarly journals Using Antibodies and Mutants To Localize the Presumptive gH/gL Binding Site on Herpes Simplex Virus gD

2018 ◽  
Vol 92 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Doina Atanasiu ◽  
Wan Ting Saw ◽  
Eric Lazear ◽  
J. Charles Whitbeck ◽  
Tina M. Cairns ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fusion ◽  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Viral Entry ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Epitope Mapping ◽  
Virus Entry ◽  
Cellular Receptor ◽  
Functional Sites ◽  
Cell Cell

ABSTRACTHSV virus-cell and cell-cell fusion requires multiple interactions between four essential virion envelope glycoproteins, gD, gB, gH, and gL, and between gD and a cellular receptor, nectin-1 or herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM). Current models suggest that binding of gD to receptors induces a conformational change that leads to activation of gH/gL and consequent triggering of the prefusion form of gB to promote membrane fusion. Since protein-protein interactions guide each step of fusion, identifying the sites of interaction may lead to the identification of potential therapeutic targets that block this process. We have previously identified two “faces” on gD: one for receptor binding and the other for its presumed interaction with gH/gL. We previously separated the gD monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) into five competition communities. MAbs from two communities (MC2 and MC5) neutralize virus infection and block cell-cell fusion but do not block receptor binding, suggesting that they block binding of gD to gH/gL. Using a combination of classical epitope mapping of gD mutants with fusion and entry assays, we identified two residues (R67 and P54) on the presumed gH/gL interaction face of gD that allowed for fusion and viral entry but were no longer sensitive to inhibition by MC2 or MC5, yet both were blocked by other MAbs. As neutralizing antibodies interfere with essential steps in the fusion pathway, our studies strongly suggest that these key residues block the interaction of gD with gH/gL.IMPORTANCEVirus entry and cell-cell fusion mediated by HSV require gD, gH/gL, gB, and a gD receptor. Neutralizing antibodies directed against any of these proteins bind to residues within key functional sites and interfere with an essential step in the fusion pathway. Thus, the epitopes of these MAbs identify critical, functional sites on their target proteins. Unlike many anti-gD MAbs, which block binding of gD to a cellular receptor, two, MC2 and MC5, block a separate, downstream step in the fusion pathway which is presumed to be the activation of the modulator of fusion, gH/gL. By combining epitope mapping of a panel of gD mutants with fusion and virus entry assays, we have identified residues that are critical in the binding and function of these two MAbs. This new information helps to define the site of the presumptive interaction of gD with gH/gL, of which we have limited knowledge.

scholarly journals The Avian Coronavirus Infectious Bronchitis Virus Undergoes Direct Low-pH-Dependent Fusion Activation during Entry into Host Cells

2006 ◽  
Vol 80 (7) ◽  
pp. 3180-3188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor C. Chu ◽  
Lisa J. McElroy ◽  
Vicky Chu ◽  
Beverley E. Bauman ◽  
Gary R. Whittaker
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fusion ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Infectious Bronchitis Virus ◽  
Fusion Reaction ◽  
Low Ph ◽  
Surface Proteins ◽  
Host Cells ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Infectious Bronchitis ◽  
Ph Dependent

ABSTRACT Coronaviruses are the causative agents of respiratory disease in humans and animals, including severe acute respiratory syndrome. Fusion of coronaviruses is generally thought to occur at neutral pH, although there is also evidence for a role of acidic endosomes during entry of a variety of coronaviruses. Therefore, the molecular basis of coronavirus fusion during entry into host cells remains incompletely defined. Here, we examined coronavirus-cell fusion and entry employing the avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus (IBV). Virus entry into cells was inhibited by acidotropic bases and by other inhibitors of pH-dependent endocytosis. We carried out fluorescence-dequenching fusion assays of R18-labeled virions and show that for IBV, coronavirus-cell fusion occurs in a low-pH-dependent manner, with a half-maximal rate of fusion occurring at pH 5.5. Fusion was reduced, but still occurred, at lower temperatures (20°C). We observed no effect of inhibitors of endosomal proteases on the fusion event. These data are the first direct measure of virus-cell fusion for any coronavirus and demonstrate that the coronavirus IBV employs a direct, low-pH-dependent virus-cell fusion activation reaction. We further show that IBV was not inactivated, and fusion was unaffected, by prior exposure to pH 5.0 buffer. Virions also showed evidence of reversible conformational changes in their surface proteins, indicating that aspects of the fusion reaction may be reversible in nature.

Headless henipaviral receptor binding glycoproteins reveal key post-receptor binding contributions of the globular head and head/stalk interface in fusion promotion

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao Yu Yeo ◽  
David W. Buchholz ◽  
Amandine Gamble ◽  
Mason Jager ◽  
Hector C. Aguilar
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fusion ◽  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Viral Entry ◽  
Surface Expression ◽  
Cell Surface Expression ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Emerging Viruses ◽  
Multinucleated Cells ◽  
Head Domain ◽  
Cell Cell

Cedar virus (CedV) is a nonpathogenic member of the Henipavirus (HNV) genus of emerging viruses, which includes the deadly Nipah (NiV) and Hendra (HeV) viruses. CedV forms syncytia, a hallmark of henipaviral and paramyxoviral infections and pathogenicity. However, the intrinsic fusogenic capacity of CedV relative to NiV or HeV remains unquantified. HNV entry is mediated by concerted interactions between the attachment (G) and fusion (F) glycoproteins. Upon receptor binding by the HNV G head domain, a fusion-activating G stalk region is exposed and triggers F to undergo a conformational cascade that leads to viral entry or cell-cell fusion. Here, we first demonstrated quantitatively that CedV is inherently significantly less fusogenic than NiV at equivalent G and F cell surface expression levels. We then generated and tested six headless CedV G mutants of distinct stalk C-terminal lengths, surprisingly revealing highly hyperfusogenic cell-cell fusion phenotypes 3 to 4-fold greater than wild-type CedV levels. Additionally, similarly to NiV, a headless HeV G mutant yielded a less pronounced hyperfusogenic phenotype compared to wild-type HeV. Further, coimmunoprecipitation and cell-cell fusion assays revealed heterotypic NiV/CedV functional G/F bidentate interactions, as well as evidence of HNV G head domain involvement beyond receptor binding or G stalk exposure. All evidence points to the G head/stalk junction being key to modulating HNV fusogenicity, supporting the notion that head domains play several distinct and central roles in modulating stalk domain fusion promotion. Further, this study exemplifies how CedV may help elucidate important mechanistic underpinnings of HNV entry and pathogenicity. IMPORTANCE The Henipavirus genus in the Paramyxoviridae family includes the zoonotic Nipah (NiV) and Hendra (HeV) viruses. NiV and HeV infections often cause fatal encephalitis and pneumonia, but no vaccines or therapeutics are currently approved for human use. Upon viral entry, Henipavirus infections yield the formation of multinucleated cells (syncytia). Viral entry and cell-cell fusion are mediated by the attachment (G) and fusion (F) glycoproteins. Cedar virus (CedV), a nonpathogenic henipavirus, may be a useful tool to gain knowledge on henipaviral pathogenicity. Here, using homotypic and heterotypic full-length and headless CedV, NiV, and HeV G/F combinations, we discovered that CedV G/F are significantly less fusogenic than NiV or HeV G/F, and that the G head/stalk junction is key to modulating cell-cell fusion, refining the mechanism of henipaviral membrane fusion events. Our study exemplifies how CedV may be a useful tool to elucidate broader mechanistic understanding for the important henipaviruses.

scholarly journals Lassa Fever Virus Glycoprotein Mediates LAMP1- and Low pH-Dependent Cell-Cell Fusion through a Stalk-Pore Mechanism

2018 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 605a
Author(s):  
Ruben M. Markosyan ◽  
Mariana Marin ◽  
Fredric S. Cohen ◽  
Gregory B. Melikyan
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fusion ◽  
Lassa Fever ◽  
Low Ph ◽  
Fever Virus ◽  
Virus Glycoprotein ◽  
Lassa Fever Virus ◽  
Dependent Cell ◽  
Ph Dependent ◽  
Cell Cell

scholarly journals Antigenic Properties of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Envelope during Cell-Cell Fusion

2001 ◽  
Vol 75 (22) ◽  
pp. 11096-11105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine M. Finnegan ◽  
Werner Berg ◽  
George K. Lewis ◽  
Anthony L. DeVico
Keyword(s):  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Cell Fusion ◽  
Target Cell ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Coreceptor Binding ◽  
Antigenic Properties ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Cell Interface ◽  
Cell Cell

ABSTRACT Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) fusion and entry involves sequential interactions between the viral envelope protein, gp120, cell surface CD4, and a G-protein-coupled coreceptor. Each interaction creates an intermediate gp120 structure predicted to display distinct antigenic features, including key functional domains for viral entry. In this study, we examined the disposition of these features during the fusion of HeLa cells expressing either HIVHXB2 envelope (Env cells) or CXCR4 and CD4 (target cells). Cell-cell fusion, indicated by cytoplasmic dye transfer, was allowed to progress for various times and then arrested. The cells were then examined for reactivity with antibodies directed against receptor-induced epitopes on gp120. Analyses of cells arrested by cooling to 4°C revealed that antibodies against the CD4-induced coreceptor-binding domain, i.e., 17b, 48d, and CG10, faintly react with Env cells even in the absence of target cell or soluble CD4 (sCD4) interactions. Such reactivity increased after exposure to sCD4 but remained unchanged during fusion with target cells and was not intensified at the Env-target cell interface. Notably, the antibodies did not react with Env cells when treated with a covalent cross-linker either alone or during fusion with target cells. Immunoreactivity could not be promoted or otherwise altered on either temperature arrested or cross-linked cells by preventing coreceptor interactions or by using a 17b Fab. In comparison, two other gp120-CD4 complex-dependent antibodies against epitopes outside the coreceptor domain, 8F101 and A32, exhibited a different pattern of reactivity. These antibodies reacted with the Env-target cell interface only after 30 min of cocultivation, concurrent with the first visible transfer of cytoplasmic dye from Env to target cells. At later times, the staining surrounded entire syncytia. Such binding was entirely dependent on the formation of gp120-CD4-CXCR4 tricomplexes since staining was absent with SDF-treated or coreceptor-negative target cells. Overall, these studies show that access to the CD4-induced coreceptor-binding domain on gp120 is largely blocked at the fusing cell interface and is unlikely to represent a target for neutralizing antibodies. However, new epitopes are presented on intermediate gp120 structures formed as a result of coreceptor interactions. Such findings have important implications for HIV vaccine approaches based on conformational alterations in envelope structures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document