scholarly journals Regulation of the proneural gene achaete by helix-loop-helix proteins.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 3514-3521 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Martínez ◽  
J Modolell ◽  
J Garrell
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Antagonistic Effect ◽  
Helix Loop Helix ◽  
Regulated Expression ◽  
E Boxes ◽  
Bhlh Proteins ◽  
Self Stimulation

The Achaete (Ac) protein, a transcriptional regulator of the basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) type, confers upon ectodermal cells the ability to become neural precursors. Its temporally and spatially regulated expression, together with that of the related Scute (Sc) protein, helps define the pattern of Drosophila melanogaster sensory organs. We have examined the transcriptional control of the ac gene and shown, using in vivo assays, that several E-boxes, putative interacting sites for bHLH proteins, present in the ac promoter are most important for ac regulation. They most likely mediate ac self-stimulation and sc trans-activation. We also demonstrate that ac transcription is negatively regulated in vivo by the gene extramacrochaetae (emc) in a manner dependent on Ac and Sc products. emc encodes an HLH protein that lacks the basic region and presumably antagonizes Ac and Sc function by sequestering these proteins in complexes unable to interact with DNA. Our results strongly support the model of negative regulation of emc on ac and sc transcription through titration of their products. As currently thought, this seems accomplished by heterodimerization via the HLH domain, because an amino acid substitution in this region abolishes the emc antagonistic effect both in vitro and in vivo.

Regulation of the proneural gene achaete by helix-loop-helix proteins

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 3514-3521
Author(s):  
C Martínez ◽  
J Modolell ◽  
J Garrell
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Antagonistic Effect ◽  
Helix Loop Helix ◽  
Regulated Expression ◽  
E Boxes ◽  
Bhlh Proteins ◽  
Self Stimulation

The Achaete (Ac) protein, a transcriptional regulator of the basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) type, confers upon ectodermal cells the ability to become neural precursors. Its temporally and spatially regulated expression, together with that of the related Scute (Sc) protein, helps define the pattern of Drosophila melanogaster sensory organs. We have examined the transcriptional control of the ac gene and shown, using in vivo assays, that several E-boxes, putative interacting sites for bHLH proteins, present in the ac promoter are most important for ac regulation. They most likely mediate ac self-stimulation and sc trans-activation. We also demonstrate that ac transcription is negatively regulated in vivo by the gene extramacrochaetae (emc) in a manner dependent on Ac and Sc products. emc encodes an HLH protein that lacks the basic region and presumably antagonizes Ac and Sc function by sequestering these proteins in complexes unable to interact with DNA. Our results strongly support the model of negative regulation of emc on ac and sc transcription through titration of their products. As currently thought, this seems accomplished by heterodimerization via the HLH domain, because an amino acid substitution in this region abolishes the emc antagonistic effect both in vitro and in vivo.

scholarly journals miRNA Clusters with Down-Regulated Expression in Human Colorectal Cancer and Their Regulation

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (13) ◽  
pp. 4633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulína Pidíkova ◽  
Richard Reis ◽  
Iveta Herichova
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
In Vitro Models ◽  
Mirna Regulation ◽  
Regulated Expression ◽  
Mirna Clusters ◽  
Position Regulation ◽  
Non Coding Rnas

Regulation of microRNA (miRNA) expression has been extensively studied with respect to colorectal cancer (CRC), since CRC is one of the leading causes of cancer mortality worldwide. Transcriptional control of miRNAs creating clusters can be, to some extent, estimated from cluster position on a chromosome. Levels of miRNAs are also controlled by miRNAs “sponging” by long non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). Both types of miRNA regulation strongly influence their function. We focused on clusters of miRNAs found to be down-regulated in CRC, containing miR-1, let-7, miR-15, miR-16, miR-99, miR-100, miR-125, miR-133, miR-143, miR-145, miR-192, miR-194, miR-195, miR-206, miR-215, miR-302, miR-367 and miR-497 and analysed their genome position, regulation and functions. Only evidence provided with the use of CRC in vivo and/or in vitro models was taken into consideration. Comprehensive research revealed that down-regulated miRNA clusters in CRC are mostly located in a gene intron and, in a majority of cases, miRNA clusters possess cluster-specific transcriptional regulation. For all selected clusters, regulation mediated by long ncRNA was experimentally demonstrated in CRC, at least in one cluster member. Oncostatic functions were predominantly linked with the reviewed miRNAs, and their high expression was usually associated with better survival. These findings implicate the potential of down-regulated clusters in CRC to become promising multi-targets for therapeutic manipulation.

scholarly journals Accelerated Response of the myogenin Gene to Denervation in Mutant Mice Lacking Phosphorylation of Myogenin at Threonine 87

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 1983-1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris S. Blagden ◽  
Larry Fromm ◽  
Steven J. Burden
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Electrical Activity ◽  
Muscle Development ◽  
Mutant Mice ◽  
Threonine Residue ◽  
E Boxes ◽  
Bhlh Proteins

ABSTRACT Gene expression in skeletal muscle is regulated by a family of myogenic basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins. The binding of these bHLH proteins, notably MyoD and myogenin, to E-boxes in their own regulatory regions is blocked by protein kinase C (PKC)-mediated phosphorylation of a single threonine residue in their basic region. Because electrical stimulation increases PKC activity in skeletal muscle, these data have led to an attractive model suggesting that electrical activity suppresses gene expression by stimulating phosphorylation of this critical threonine residue in myogenic bHLH proteins. We show that electrical activity stimulates phosphorylation of myogenin at threonine 87 (T87) in vivo and that calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII), as well as PKC, catalyzes this reaction in vitro. We find that phosphorylation of myogenin at T87 is dispensable for skeletal muscle development. We show, however, that the decrease in myogenin (myg) expression following innervation is delayed and that the increase in expression following denervation is accelerated in mutant mice lacking phosphorylation of myogenin at T87. These data indicate that two distinct innervation-dependent mechanisms restrain myogenin activity: an inactivation mechanism mediated by phosphorylation of myogenin at T87, and a second, novel regulatory mechanism that regulates myg gene activity independently of T87 phosphorylation.

scholarly journals Tfe3 and Tfeb Transcriptionally Regulate Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ2 Expression in Adipocytes and Mediate Adiponectin and Glucose Levels in Mice

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (15) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nunciada Salma ◽  
Jun S. Song ◽  
Akinori Kawakami ◽  
Suprabha P. Devi ◽  
Mehdi Khaled ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Regulatory Region ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Peroxisome Proliferator ◽  
Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor ◽  
Fed State ◽  
Glucose Levels ◽  
E Boxes

ABSTRACT Members of the MiT transcription factor family are pivotal regulators of several lineage-selective differentiation programs. We show that two of these, Tfeb and Tfe3, control the regulator of adipogenesis, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ2 (Pparγ2). Knockdown of Tfeb or Tfe3 expression during in vitro adipogenesis causes dramatic downregulation of Pparγ2 expression as well as adipogenesis. Additionally, we found that these factors regulate Pparγ2 in mature adipocytes. Next, we demonstrated that Tfeb and Tfe3 act directly by binding to consensus E-boxes within the Pparγ transcriptional regulatory region. This transcriptional control also exists in vivo, as we discovered that wild-type mice in the fed state increased their expression of Tfe3, Tf3b, and Pparγ in white adipose tissue. Furthermore, Tfe3 knockout (Tfe3KO) mice in the fed state failed to upregulate Pparγ and the adiponectin gene, a Pparγ-dependent gene, confirming the in vivo role for Tfe3. Lastly, we found that blood glucose is elevated and serum adiponectin levels are suppressed in the Tfe3KO mice, indicating that the Tfe3/Tfeb/Pparγ2 axis may contribute to whole-body energy balance. Thus, we offer new insights into the upstream regulation of Pparγ by Tfe3/Tf3b and propose that targeting these transcription factors may offer opportunities to complement existing approaches for the treatment of diseases that have dysregulated energy metabolism.

scholarly journals Trypanosoma brucei Translation Initiation Factor Homolog EIF4E6 Forms a Tripartite Cytosolic Complex with EIF4G5 and a Capping Enzyme Homolog

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 896-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eden R. Freire ◽  
Amaranta M. Malvezzi ◽  
Ajay A. Vashisht ◽  
Joanna Zuberek ◽  
Edwin A. Saada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Translation Initiation Factor ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Nucleoside Triphosphate ◽  
Rna Interaction

ABSTRACT Trypanosomes lack the transcriptional control characteristic of the majority of eukaryotes that is mediated by gene-specific promoters in a one-gene–one-promoter arrangement. Rather, their genomes are transcribed in large polycistrons with no obvious functional linkage. Posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression must thus play a larger role in these organisms. The eIF4E homolog TbEIF4E6 binds mRNA cap analogs in vitro and is part of a complex in vivo that may fulfill such a role. Knockdown of TbEIF4E6 tagged with protein A-tobacco etch virus protease cleavage site-protein C to approximately 15% of the normal expression level resulted in viable cells that displayed a set of phenotypes linked to detachment of the flagellum from the length of the cell body, if not outright flagellum loss. While these cells appeared and behaved as normal under stationary liquid culture conditions, standard centrifugation resulted in a marked increase in flagellar detachment. Furthermore, the ability of TbEIF4E6-depleted cells to engage in social motility was reduced. The TbEIF4E6 protein forms a cytosolic complex containing a triad of proteins, including the eIF4G homolog TbEIF4G5 and a hypothetical protein of 70.3 kDa, referred to as TbG5-IP. The TbG5-IP analysis revealed two domains with predicted secondary structures conserved in mRNA capping enzymes: nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase and guanylyltransferase. These complex members have the potential for RNA interaction, either via the 5′ cap structure for TbEIF4E6 and TbG5-IP or through RNA-binding domains in TbEIF4G5. The associated proteins provide a signpost for future studies to determine how this complex affects capped RNA molecules.

scholarly journals Differential Regulation of Hand1 Homodimer and Hand1-E12 Heterodimer Activity by the Cofactor FHL2

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (22) ◽  
pp. 9835-9847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison A. Hill ◽  
Paul R. Riley
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Differential Regulation ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Helix Loop Helix ◽  
Developing Heart ◽  
Unknown Protein ◽  
Class B ◽  
Bhlh Proteins

ABSTRACT The basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) factor Hand1 plays an essential role in cardiac morphogenesis, and yet its precise function remains unknown. Protein-protein interactions involving Hand1 provide a means of determining how Hand1-induced gene expression in the developing heart might be regulated. Hand1 is known to form either heterodimers with near-ubiquitous E-factors and other lineage-restricted class B bHLH proteins or homodimers with itself in vitro. To date, there have been no reported Hand1 protein interactions involving non-bHLH proteins. Heterodimer-versus-homodimer choice is mediated by the phosphorylation status of Hand1; however, little is known about the in vivo function of these dimers or, importantly, how they are regulated. In an effort to understand how Hand1 activity in the heart might be regulated postdimerization, we have investigated tertiary Hand1-protein interactions with non-bHLH factors. We describe a novel interaction of Hand1 with the LIM domain protein FHL2, a known transcriptional coactivator and corepressor expressed in the developing cardiovascular system. FHL2 interacts with Hand1 via the bHLH domain and is able to repress Hand1/E12 heterodimer-induced transcription but has no effect on Hand1/Hand1 homodimer activity. This effect of FHL2 is not mediated either at the level of dimerization or via an effect of Hand1/E12 DNA binding. In summary, our data describe a novel differential regulation of Hand1 heterodimers versus homodimers by association of the cofactor FHL2 and provide insight into the potential for a tertiary level of control of Hand1 activity in the developing heart.

scholarly journals The basic domain of myogenic basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins is the novel target for direct inhibition by another bHLH protein, Twist.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 6563-6573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Hamamori ◽  
H Y Wu ◽  
V Sartorelli ◽  
L Kedes
Keyword(s):  
Bhlh Protein ◽  
E Proteins ◽  
Basic Domain ◽  
Basic Helix Loop Helix ◽  
Helix Loop Helix ◽  
E Protein ◽  
Arginine Residues ◽  
Bhlh Proteins

In vertebrates, the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) protein Twist may be involved in the negative regulation of cellular determination and in the differentiation of several lineages, including myogenesis, osteogenesis, and neurogenesis. Although it has been shown that mouse twist (M-Twist) (i) sequesters E proteins, thus preventing formation of myogenic E protein-MyoD complexes and (ii) inhibits the MEF2 transcription factor, a cofactor of myogenic bHLH proteins, overexpression of E proteins and MEF2 failed to rescue the inhibitory effects of M-Twist on MyoD. We report here that M-Twist physically interacts with the myogenic bHLH proteins in vitro and in vivo and that this interaction is required for the inhibition of MyoD by M-Twist. In contrast to the conventional HLH-HLH domain interaction formed in the MyoD/E12 heterodimer, this novel type of interaction uses the basic domains of the two proteins. While the MyoD HLH domain without the basic domain failed to interact with M-Twist, a MyoD peptide containing only the basic and helix 1 regions was sufficient to interact with M-Twist, suggesting that the basic domain contacts M-Twist. The replacement of three arginine residues by alanines in the M-Twist basic domain was sufficient to abolish both the binding and inhibition of MyoD by M-Twist, while the domain retained other M-Twist functions such as heterodimerization with an E protein and inhibition of MEF2 transactivation. These findings demonstrate that M-Twist interacts with MyoD through the basic domains, thereby inhibiting MyoD.

scholarly journals Determinants of Myogenic Specificity within MyoD Are Required for Noncanonical E Box Binding

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (16) ◽  
pp. 5910-5920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Analeah B. Heidt ◽  
Anabel Rojas ◽  
Ian S. Harris ◽  
Brian L. Black
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Promoter Regions ◽  
Basic Domain ◽  
Helix Loop Helix ◽  
E Box ◽  
Muscle Genes ◽  
E Boxes ◽  
Bhlh Transcription Factors

ABSTRACT The MyoD family of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors has the remarkable ability to induce myogenesis in vitro and in vivo. This myogenic specificity has been mapped to two amino acids in the basic domain, an alanine and threonine, referred to as the myogenic code. These essential determinants of myogenic specificity are conserved in all MyoD family members from worms to humans, yet their function in myogenesis is unclear. Induction of the muscle transcriptional program requires that MyoD be able to locate and stably bind to sequences present in the promoter regions of critical muscle genes. Recent studies have shown that MyoD binds to noncanonical E boxes in the myogenin gene, a critical locus required for myogenesis, through interactions with resident heterodimers of the HOX-TALE transcription factors Pbx1A and Meis1. In the present study, we show that the myogenic code is required for MyoD to bind to noncanonical E boxes in the myogenin promoter and for the formation of a tetrameric complex with Pbx/Meis. We also show that these essential determinants of myogenesis are sufficient to confer noncanonical E box binding to the E12 basic domain. Thus, these data show that noncanonical E box binding correlates with myogenic potential, and we speculate that the myogenic code residues in MyoD function as myogenic determinants via their role in noncanonical E box binding and recognition.

scholarly journals Characterization of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus X4-like accessory protein

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olanrewaju Ayodeji Durojaye ◽  
Nkwachukwu Oziamara Okoro ◽  
Arome Solomon Odiba
Keyword(s):  
Rapid Development ◽  
Protein A ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Quality Model ◽  
A Value ◽  
Model Protein ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Global Threat

Abstract Background The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is currently a global threat to health and economies. Therapeutics and vaccines are in rapid development; however, none of these therapeutics are considered as absolute cure, and the potential to mutate makes it necessary to find therapeutics that target a highly conserved regions of the viral structure. Results In this study, we characterized an essential but poorly understood coronavirus accessory X4 protein, a core and stable component of the SARS-CoV family. Sequence analysis shows a conserved ~ 90% identity between the SARS-CoV-2 and previously characterized X4 protein in the database. QMEAN Z score of the model protein shows a value of around 0.5, within the acceptable range 0–1. A MolProbity score of 2.96 was obtained for the model protein and indicates a good quality model. The model has Ramachandran values of φ = − 57o and ψ = − 47o for α-helices and values of φ = − 130o and ψ = + 140o for twisted sheets. Conclusions The protein data obtained from this study provides robust information for further in vitro and in vivo experiment, targeted at devising therapeutics against the virus. Phylogenetic analysis further supports previous evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 is positioned with the SL-CoVZC45, BtRs-BetaCoV/YN2018B and the RS4231 Bat SARS-like corona viruses.

scholarly journals The Yeast Recombinational Repair Protein Rad59 Interacts With Rad52 and Stimulates Single-Strand Annealing

Genetics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 159 (2) ◽  
pp. 515-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison P Davis ◽  
Lorraine S Symington
Keyword(s):  
Protein A ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Physical Interaction ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Stranded Dna ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing ◽  
Recombination Pathway

Abstract The yeast RAD52 gene is essential for homology-dependent repair of DNA double-strand breaks. In vitro, Rad52 binds to single- and double-stranded DNA and promotes annealing of complementary single-stranded DNA. Genetic studies indicate that the Rad52 and Rad59 proteins act in the same recombination pathway either as a complex or through overlapping functions. Here we demonstrate physical interaction between Rad52 and Rad59 using the yeast two-hybrid system and co-immunoprecipitation from yeast extracts. Purified Rad59 efficiently anneals complementary oligonucleotides and is able to overcome the inhibition to annealing imposed by replication protein A (RPA). Although Rad59 has strand-annealing activity by itself in vitro, this activity is insufficient to promote strand annealing in vivo in the absence of Rad52. The rfa1-D288Y allele partially suppresses the in vivo strand-annealing defect of rad52 mutants, but this is independent of RAD59. These results suggest that in vivo Rad59 is unable to compete with RPA for single-stranded DNA and therefore is unable to promote single-strand annealing. Instead, Rad59 appears to augment the activity of Rad52 in strand annealing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document