Special issue: Genome editing and gene therapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (7) ◽  
pp. 651-652
Author(s):  
A. A. Zamyatnin
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara E. Ratican ◽  
Andrew Osborne ◽  
Keith R. Martin

The eye is at the forefront of the application of gene therapy techniques to medicine. In the United States, a gene therapy treatment for Leber’s congenital amaurosis, a rare inherited retinal disease, recently became the first gene therapy to be approved by the FDA for the treatment of disease caused by mutations in a specific gene. Phase III clinical trials of gene therapy for other single-gene defect diseases of the retina and optic nerve are also currently underway. However, for optic nerve diseases not caused by single-gene defects, gene therapy strategies are likely to focus on slowing or preventing neuronal death through the expression of neuroprotective agents. In addition to these strategies, there has also been recent interest in the potential use of precise genome editing techniques to treat ocular disease. This review focuses on recent developments in gene therapy techniques for the treatment of glaucoma and Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON). We discuss recent successes in clinical trials for the treatment of LHON using gene supplementation therapy, promising neuroprotective strategies that have been employed in animal models of glaucoma and the potential use of genome editing techniques in treating optic nerve disease.


2003 ◽  
Vol 2003 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Nicol Keith ◽  
Claude Bagnis
Keyword(s):  

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. SCI-16-SCI-16
Author(s):  
Mitchell J Weiss

Genetic forms of anemia caused by HBB gene mutations that impair beta globin production are extremely common worldwide. The resultant disorders, mainly sickle cell disease (SCD) and beta-thalassemia, cause substantial morbidity and early mortality. Treatments for these diseases include medical therapies and bone marrow transplantation (BMT), which can be curative. However, medical therapies are suboptimal and BMT is associated with serious toxicities, particularly because HLA-matched allogeneic sibling donors are not available for most patients. Thus, new therapies are urgently needed for millions of affected individuals. Gene therapy offers great promise to cure SCD and beta thalassemia and emerging genome editing technologies represent a new form of gene therapy. Approaches to cure SCD and beta-thalassemia via genome editing include: 1) Correction of HBB mutations by homology directed repair (HDR); 2) use of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) to activate gamma globin production and raise fetal hemoglobin (HbF) levels; 3) NHEJ to disrupt alpha-globin genes (HBA1 or HBA2) and thereby alleviate globin chain imbalance in intermediately severe forms of beta thalassemia. Challenges for these approaches include selection of the most effective genome editing tools, optimizing their delivery to hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), improving specificity and better understanding potential off target effects, particularly those that are biologically relevant. Technologies for genome editing are advancing rapidly and being tested in preclinical models for HBB-mutated disorders. Ultimately, however, the best strategies can only be identified in clinical trials. This will require close collaborations between basic/translational researchers who study genome editing, clinical hematologists and collaboration between experts in academia and the bio-pharmaceutical industry. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Amendola ◽  
Aurélie Bedel ◽  
Ana Buj Bello ◽  
Mathieu Carrara ◽  
Jean-paul Concordet ◽  
...  

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadja Bischoff ◽  
Sandra Wimberger ◽  
Marcello Maresca ◽  
Cord Brakebusch

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) genome editing has become a standard method in molecular biology, for the establishment of genetically modified cellular and animal models, for the identification and validation of drug targets in animals, and is heavily tested for use in gene therapy of humans. While the efficiency of CRISPR mediated gene targeting is much higher than of classical targeted mutagenesis, the efficiency of CRISPR genome editing to introduce defined changes into the genome is still low. Overcoming this problem will have a great impact on the use of CRISPR genome editing in academic and industrial research and the clinic. This review will present efforts to achieve this goal by small molecules, which modify the DNA repair mechanisms to facilitate the precise alteration of the genome.


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-289
Author(s):  
F. Martin ◽  
A. Gutierrez-Guerrero ◽  
S. Sánchez ◽  
G. Galvani ◽  
K. Benabdellah

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Divya Sinha ◽  
Benjamin Steyer ◽  
Pawan K. Shahi ◽  
Katherine Mueller ◽  
Rasa Valiauga ◽  
...  

AbstractDominantly inherited disorders are not typically considered therapeutic candidates for gene augmentation. Here, we utilized patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium (iPSC-RPE) to test the potential of gene augmentation to treat Best disease, a dominant macular dystrophy caused by over 200 missense mutations in BEST1. Gene augmentation in iPSC-RPE fully restored BEST1 calcium-activated chloride channel activity and improved rhodopsin degradation in iPSC-RPE models of recessive bestrophinopathy and dominant Best disease caused by two different ion binding domain mutations. A dominant Best disease iPSC-RPE model that did not respond to gene augmentation showed normalization of BEST1 channel activity following CRISPR-Cas9 editing of the mutant allele. We then tested gene editing in all three dominant Best disease iPSC-RPE models, which produced premature stop codons exclusively within the mutant BEST1 alleles. Single-cell profiling demonstrated no adverse perturbation of RPE transcriptional programs in any model, although off-target analysis detected a silent genomic alteration in one model. These results suggest that gene augmentation is a viable first-line approach for some dominant Best disease patients and that non-responders are candidates for alternate approaches such as genome editing. However, testing genome editing strategies for on-target efficiency and off-target events using patient-matched iPSC-RPE model systems is warranted. In summary, personalized iPSC-RPE models can be used to select among a growing list of gene therapy options to maximize safety and efficacy while minimizing time and cost. Similar scenarios likely exist for other genotypically diverse channelopathies, expanding the therapeutic landscape for affected patients.SignificanceDominantly inherited disorders pose distinct challenges for gene therapies, particularly in the face of extreme mutational diversity. We tested whether a broad gene replacement strategy could reverse the cellular phenotype of Best disease, a dominant blinding condition that targets retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Using RPE generated from patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), we show that gene replacement functionally overcomes some, but not all, of the tested mutations. In comparison, all dominant Best disease models tested were phenotypically corrected after mutation-specific genome editing, although one off-target genomic alteration was discovered. Our results support a two-tiered approach to gene therapy for Best disease, guided by safety and efficacy testing in iPSC-RPE models to maximize personal and public health value.


2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (01) ◽  
pp. 45-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Haas ◽  
Viviane Dettmer ◽  
Toni Cathomen

SummaryTargeted genome editing with designer nucleases, such as zinc finger nucleases, TALE nucleases, and CRISPR-Cas nucleases, has heralded a new era in gene therapy. Genetic disorders, which have not been amenable to conventional gene-addition-type gene therapy approaches, such as disorders with dominant inheritance or diseases caused by mutations in tightly regulated genes, can now be treated by precise genome surgery. Moreover, engineered nucleases enable novel genetic interventions to fight infectious diseases or to improve cancer immunotherapies. Here, we review the development of the different classes of programmable nucleases, discuss the challenges and improvements in translating gene editing into clinical use, and give an outlook on what applications can expect to enter the clinic in the near future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document