Guideline review: management of invasive meningococcal disease, SIGN

2009 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
J H Baumer
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000077
Author(s):  
Kathryn A Taylor ◽  
David N Durrheim ◽  
Tony Merritt ◽  
Peter Massey ◽  
John Ferguson ◽  
...  

BackgroundSystem factors in a regional Australian health district contributed to avoidable care deviations from invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) management guidelines. Traditional root cause analysis (RCA) is not well-suited to IMD, focusing on individual cases rather than system improvements. As IMD requires complex care across healthcare silos, it presents an opportunity to explore and address system-based patient safety issues.ContextBaseline assessment of IMD cases (2005–2006) identified inadequate triage, lack of senior clinician review, inconsistent vital sign recording and laboratory delays as common issues, resulting in antibiotic administration delays and inappropriate or premature discharge.MethodsClinical governance, in partnership with clinical and public health services, established a multidisciplinary Meningococcal Reference Group (MRG) to routinely review management of all IMD cases. The MRG comprised representatives from primary care, acute care, public health, laboratory medicine and clinical governance. Baseline data were compared with two subsequent evaluation points (2011–2012 and 2013–2015).InterventionsPhase I involved multidisciplinary process mapping and development of a standardised audit tool from national IMD management guidelines. Phase II involved formalisation of group processes and advocacy for operational change. Phase III focused on dissemination of findings to clinicians and managers.ResultsGreatest care improvements were observed in the final evaluation. Median antibiotic delay decreased from 72 to 42 min and proportion of cases triaged appropriately improved from 38% to 75% between 2013 and 2015. Increasing fatal outcomes were attributed to the emergence of more virulent meningococcal serotypes.ConclusionsThe MRG was a key mechanism for identifying system gaps, advocating for change and enhancing communication and coordination across services. Employing IMD case review as a focus for district-level process reflection presents an innovative patient safety approach, combining the strengths of prospective hazard analysis with more traditional RCA methodologies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-62
Author(s):  
M. I. Gritsay ◽  
M. A. Koroleva ◽  
N. N. Fomkina ◽  
I. S. Koroleva

Aims. The purpose of this study was to identify current epidemiological features of meningococcal infection in Moscow.Materials and methods. Cases of invasive meningococcal disease in Moscow from 2014 to 2018 and the biomaterial from patients with an invasive meningococcal disease were analyzed.Results. The features of the epidemic process of meningococcal disease in Moscow were revealed: increasing in the incidence rate involving teenagers and young adults into the epidemic process; meningococcal strains of serogroups W and A increased in the etiology of the invasive meningococcal disease; high mortality rate.Conclusions. It seems reasonable to recommend vaccination against meningococcal disease by including adolescents, young adults and persons over 65 years old.


2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 136-137
Author(s):  
Alexandre Chlilek ◽  
Saber‐Davide Barbar ◽  
Robin Stephan ◽  
Claudine Barbuat ◽  
Guillaume Cayla ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 100082
Author(s):  
Simon M Durkin ◽  
Clemency Britton ◽  
Graham S Cooke ◽  
Ravi Mehta

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document