Development and initial validation of international severity scoring system for familial Mediterranean fever (ISSF)

2016 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 1051-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erkan Demirkaya ◽  
Cengizhan Acikel ◽  
Philip Hashkes ◽  
Marco Gattorno ◽  
Ahmet Gul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Familial Mediterranean Fever ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Laboratory Findings ◽  
Therapeutic Decisions ◽  
Mediterranean Fever

ObjectiveTo develop widely accepted international severity score for children and adult patients with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) that can be easily applied, in research and clinical practice.MethodsCandidate severity criteria were suggested by several FMF expert physicians. After three rounds of Delphi survey, the candidate criteria, defined by the survey, were discussed by experts in a consensus meeting. Each expert brought data of clinical manifestations, laboratory findings and physician's global assessments (PGAs) of minimum 20 patients from their centres. We used the PGAs for disease severity as a gold standard. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the predicting value of each item, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to demonstrate the success of the criteria set.ResultsA total of 281 patients consist of 162 children and 119 adults with FMF were enrolled and available for validity analysis: Nine domains were included in the final core set of variables for the evaluation of disease severity in FMF. The International Severity Score for FMF (ISSF) may reach a maximum of 10 if all items are maximally scored. The threshold values to determine: severe disease ≥6, intermediate disease 3–5, mild disease ≤2. Area under the curve was calculated as 0.825 for this set in the whole group.ConclusionsThe initial validity of ISSF both in children and adult with FMF was demonstrated. We anticipate that it will provide a robust tool to objectively define disease severity for clinical trials, future research as well as for therapeutic decisions in managing patients with FMF.

scholarly journals Association between incubation period and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (9) ◽  
pp. 030006052095683
Author(s):  
Yeyu Cai ◽  
Jiayi Liu ◽  
Haitao Yang ◽  
Mian Wang ◽  
Qingping Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Incubation Period ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve ◽  
Hunan Province ◽  
Laboratory Findings ◽  
Incubation Periods

Purpose To investigate associations between the clinical characteristics and incubation periods of patients infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China. Methods Complete clinical and epidemiological data from 149 patients with COVID-19 at a hospital in Hunan Province, China, were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Results Analysis of the distribution and receiver operator characteristic curve of incubation periods showed that 7 days was the optimal cut-off value to assess differences in disease severity between groups. Patients with shorter (≤7 days) incubation periods (n = 79) had more severe disease, longer durations of hospitalization, longer times from symptom onset to discharge, more abnormal laboratory findings, and more severe radiological findings than patients with longer (>7 days) incubation periods. Regression and correlation analyses also showed that a shorter incubation period was associated with longer times from symptom onset to discharge. Conclusion The associations between the incubation periods and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients suggest that the incubation period may be a useful marker of disease severity and prognosis.

RECURRENT POLYSEROSITIS ("PERIODIC DISEASE," "FAMILIAL MEDITERRANEAN FEVER") IN CHILDREN

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1962 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 443-449
Author(s):  
Tehila R. Shapiro ◽  
Ernest N. Ehrenfeld
Keyword(s):  
Familial Mediterranean Fever ◽  
Acute Rheumatic Fever ◽  
Age Of Onset ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Laboratory Findings ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Periodic Disease ◽  
Mediterranean Fever ◽  
The Difference

A series of 19 cases of recurrent polyserositis is presented. All but one child were of Oriental Jewish parentage, and the disease sometimes showed a familial occurrence. The average age of onset was 4 years. The symptoms consisted of fever; abdominal, chest, and joint pains; and skin eruptions. The clinical manifestations often simulated those of acute rheumatic fever, particularly since cardiac murmurs occurred in more than half of the patients. The laboratory findings were those accompanying nonspecific inflammations such as leukocytosis, accelerated enythrocyte sedimentation rate, elevated antistreptolysin titer, and positive C-reactive protein. Though some patients showed transitional albuminunia, no cases of amyloidosis were found. The difference in the clinical manifestations in children as compared with adults, and possible etiological factors are discussed.

scholarly journals SAT0541 THE SEVERITY OF FMF MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH CO-MORBIDITIES

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1227.3-1228
Author(s):  
M. E. Tezcan ◽  
N. Şen ◽  
M. Yilmaz ◽  
Ö. Volkan ◽  
E. Tükel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Familial Mediterranean Fever ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Disease Duration ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Disease Group ◽  
Severity Scoring ◽  
Mild Disease ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
Mediterranean Fever

Background:Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is an auto inflammatory disease with recurrent attacks of serositis. Frequent attacks and disease related sequels may be associated with co-morbidities in FMF patients.Objectives:One of the tools for evaluating the FMF severity is the international severity scoring system for FMF (ISSF)1. This score includes disease related sequels, acute phase measurements, attack features and exertional leg pain. Therefore, more severe disease may be link with subclinical inflammation, amyloidosis and frequent, prolonged and widespread attacks. All these components may augment the frequency of non-disease related co-morbidities.Methods:We enrolled 158 FMF patients who fulfilled modifiedTel-HashomerDiagnosisCriteria2. The patients dichotomized based upon disease severity (mild disease or severe disease). Patients with ISSF scores lower or equal to 2 were accepted to have mild disease. Then, we compared frequency of non-disease related co-morbidities between the groups. These co-morbidities arehypertension, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism cardiovascular diseases, coronary artery diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, chronic renal disease (non-FMF related), chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, and diabetes mellitus. This study was approved by the Local Research Ethics Committee and carried out in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration. All the patients gave written informed consent. P-value lower than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.Results:Demographic features, disease duration, smoking history and body mass index (BMI) were similar between the groups. Frequency of co-morbidity in severe disease group was statistically higher than mild disease group (p=0.02). Most frequent co-morbidity was hypertension in both groups.Table.Features of mild and severe FMF groupsMild (n=135)Severe (n=23)pGender (M/F)47/8811/120.23Age36.4±11.336.5±14.30.68Smoking (%)38 (28.1)5 (21.7)0.52BMI (kg/m2)24.3±9.224.0±8.90.34Disease duration (year)7.7±11.38.6±14.30.09Amyloidosis (%)2 (1.4)3 (13.0)0.02Exon 10 homozygote (%)35 (25.9)9 (39.1)0.19Colchicine dosage (mg/day)1.2±0.41.4±0.50.02ISSF scores0.7 ±0.73.4±0.5<0.001Co-morbidity (%)25 (18.5)9 (39.1)0.02Conclusion:In our FMF patient cohort, we found that severity of the disease may be associated with higher frequency of co-morbidities. Therefore, clinicians should be aware of the high possibility of co-morbidities in patients with more severe FMF and addressed these co-morbidities timely and properly.References:[1]Demirkaya E, et al. Development and initial validation of international severity scoring system for familial Mediterranean fever (ISSF). Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:1051-6.[2]Berkun Y, et al. Diagnostic criteria of familial Mediterranean fever. Autoimmun Rev 2014;13:388-90.Acknowledgments:NoneDisclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Toll-like receptor-4 gene variations in Egyptian children with familial Mediterranean fever

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yomna Farag ◽  
Samia Salah ◽  
Hanan Tawfik ◽  
Mai Hamed ◽  
Huda Marzouk
Keyword(s):  
Familial Mediterranean Fever ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Gene Mutation ◽  
Rflp Analysis ◽  
Gene Variants ◽  
Gene Variant ◽  
Toll Like Receptor ◽  
Toll Like Receptor 4 ◽  
Egyptian Children ◽  
Mediterranean Fever

Abstract Background Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is an autosomal recessive disorder affecting people in the region of the Mediterranean Sea. It is usually associated with mutation in Mediterranean fever (MEFV) gene that encodes the pyrin protein, which affects the innate inflammatory response. Toll-like receptors (TLR) are a family of pattern recognition receptors that recognize pathogenic microbes and activate antimicrobial defense mechanisms. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) is concerned with recognition of gram-negative organisms. There is growing clinical evidence suggesting a role for expression of TLRs in the immune pathogenesis of FMF. Thus, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the presence of TLR-4 (p.Asp299Gly) and TLR-4 (p.Thr399Ile) gene variants in association with Egyptian children having FMF, furthermore, its effect on disease course and severity. Results Seventy Egyptian children diagnosed as having FMF, together with 50 age and gender-matched controls were enrolled in the study. The TLR-4 (p.Asp299Gly) and (Thr399Ile) gene variants were determined by PCR-RFLP analysis for all studied patients and controls. TLR-4 p.Asp299Gly gene variant was detected in 1 (1.4%) of the patients and p.Thr399Ile gene variant was detected in 2 (2%). None of the controls had any of the two tested gene variants. All found variations were heterozygous. We could not find a statistically significant association with disease severity in cases with or without TLR-4 gene variants (P = 0.568). Patients with M694V gene mutation showed a higher disease severity (P = 0.035). Conclusion TLR-4 (p.Asp299Gly) and (p.Thr399Ile) gene variants were not found to have a link with the occurrence, the clinical picture of FMF, its severity, and response to colchicine treatment in Egyptian children. M694V gene mutation seems to be associated with higher disease severity. Further larger studies are needed to verify these results.

scholarly journals AB1065 VISIT COMPLIANCE IN PATIENTS WITH FAMILIAL MEDITERRANEAN FEVER: RESULTS FROM A GAZI UNIVERSITY FMF COHORT

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1822.1-1822
Author(s):  
R. Bilici Salman ◽  
A. Avanoğlu Güler ◽  
H. Satiş ◽  
H. Karadeniz ◽  
H. Babaoglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Family History ◽  
Familial Mediterranean Fever ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Comorbid Disease ◽  
Rheumatology Clinic ◽  
Mediterranean Fever ◽  
One Year

Background:Follow-up in all rheumatologic patients is critical, particularly Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF). Current recommendations for all experts by the EULAR state that patients with FMF should be evaluated 6-monthly intervals to monitore the character and frequency of the attacks and the acute phase response. Disease-related complications such as amyloidosis can beasymptomaticand need only a careful follow-up.Objectives:to quantify this phenomenon and to find predictive factors of visit compliance in patients with FMF.Methods:The study included 474 adult patients with a diagnosis of FMF who followed at the outpatient rheumatology clinic of tertiary university hospital, from January 2018 to December 2018. . Demographic, socioeconomic data, familiy history, comorbid disease, medication history, characteristics, the International Severity Score for FMF (ISSF),autoinflammatory disease damage index (ADDI) were recorded. Visit compliance was defined as the presence of two visits in the outpatient rheumatology clinic for FMF last one year for the purposes set out in EULAR suggestion.Those who had fewer than two visits in the last one year were considered noncompliant.Results:230 (48.5%) were compliant while 244 (51.5 %) patients were noncompliant with their rheumatology visit. Both compliant and noncompliant patients had similar median age and disease duration. Female sex and being married was increased the visit compliance.The results of the logistic regression model exploring factors associated with compliance indicated that presence of family history in parents, absence of family history in sibling, treatment with biologic agents, other drug using,presence of more than 2 attacks except fever and adequate medical care were important predictors of visit compliance.Conclusion:In conclusion, if FMF patients visit compliance increase, their functionality, medication adherence and quality of life will increase and flares and complication of disease can decrease. Thus, we highlight some recommendations for FMF specialist, patients and health care providers to improve outcomes.Table 2.Multivariate logistic regression analysis for predictive factors of visit compliance of the patients with FMF, n=430Adj. OR%95 CI**pFamily history in parents(positive history vs negative)1,81,0-3,10.03Family history in sibling(negative history vs positive)1,91,2-3,10.004Comorbid disease status1,30,7-2,50.32Treatment(anakinra&canakinumab vs colchicine)3,71,7-8,20.001Drug using(other drugs vs FMF drugs)2,21,1-4,40.01More than 2 attacks except fever2,31,2-4,00.004Chronic peripheral arthritis2,30,8-6,60.10Proteinuria2,20,7-6,70.14Adequate medical care1,91,2-3,10.003Number of index flare within last 12-month0,90,9-1,00.38ISSF severity score0,80,7-1,10,30Disclosure of Interests:None declared

AB0980 CASE-REVIEW ON FAMILIAL MEDITERRANEAN FEVER IN A SPECIALIZED CENTRE

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1784.1-1784
Author(s):  
R. Dos Santos Sobrín ◽  
M. Martí Masanet ◽  
B. Lopez-Montesinos ◽  
L. Lacruz Pérez ◽  
I. Calvo
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Familial Mediterranean Fever ◽  
Periodic Fever ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Strong Association ◽  
Mefv Gene ◽  
Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Case Review ◽  
Mediterranean Fever

Background:Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is a genetic autoinflammatory disorder caused mostly by mutations in MEFV gene. Its inheritance is autosomal recessive and is the most frequent periodic fever syndrome. First-line treatment is based in colchicine use, so biologics (anti-IL-1) are reserved for refractory cases1, 2.Objectives:To account for clinic and treatment features of patients with FMF in a specialized center as opposed to non-referent centers.Methods:This study was developed in the Pediatric Rheumatology Service in Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe de Valencia. Demographic, clinic and treatment data were collected from patients diagnosed of FMF since January 2004 to September 2019.Results:106 patients met last FMF criteria3. 55% had a pathogenic mutation in genetic analysis. 52% were female. Before 10 years old, 71% of patients had the diagnosis (51% before 4 years old). Arthralgia/myalgia (73%), periodic fever (62%) and abdominal pain (54%) were the most common symptoms. Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA, 6), other forms of JIA (9) and vasculitis (10) were the most prevalent comorbidities. When talking about treatment, 76,4% received Colchicine (60,5% with good response), 22,6% needed a classical disease modifying antirheumatic drug (mostly Methotrexate) and 22 patients got biologic treatment (73% anti-IL-1).Conclusion:When analyzing this case-review, JIA has a strong association with our patients, so it could explain severe disease activity and more articular involvement. This could be an illustration to the higher use of Methotrexate. Also, the most relevant symptom was arthralgia while fever is the most frequent in literature. Likewise, age of diagnosis has been earlier than other case-series (this would be more frequent in other autoinflammatory syndromes, as literature relates)1, 2, 4.References:[1]Ozdogan H, Ugurlu S. Familial Mediterranean Fever. Presse Med. (2019).[2]Ozen S, Demirkaya E, Erer B, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of familial Mediterranean fever. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:644-651.[3]Sag E, Demirel D, Demir S, et al. Performance of the new “Eurofever/PRINTO classification criteria” in FMF patients. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019;19:30369-5.[4]Rozenbaum M, Rosner I. Severe outcome of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) associated with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2004;22:S75-8.Disclosure of Interests:Raquel Dos Santos Sobrín: None declared, Miguel Martí Masanet: None declared, B Lopez-Montesinos: None declared, Lucía Lacruz Pérez: None declared, Inmaculada Calvo Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clementia, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffman-La Roche, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffman-La Roche, Novartis

scholarly journals Update on Atopic Dermatitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiago Torres ◽  
Eduarda Osório Ferreira ◽  
Margarida Gonçalo ◽  
Pedro Mendes-Bastos ◽  
Manuela Selores ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atopic Dermatitis ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Skin Barrier ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Severe Atopic Dermatitis ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Barrier Dysfunction ◽  
Therapeutic Goals ◽  
Global Health Issue

With an increasing prevalence during the past decades, atopic dermatitis has become a global health issue. A literature search following a targeted approach was undertaken to perform this non-systematic review, which intends to provide an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical features, comorbidities, and current therapies for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. In sum, this is a heterogeneous skin disorder associated with variable morphology, distribution, and disease course. Although not completely understood, its pathogenesis is complex and seems to result from a combination of genetic and environmental factors that induce skin barrier dysfunction, cutaneous and systemic immune dysregulation, skin microbiota dysbiosis, and a strong genetic influence. Diagnosis is based on specific criteria that consider patient and family history and clinical manifestations. Overall disease severity must be determined by evaluating both objective signs and subjective symptoms. Therapeutic goals require a multistep approach, focusing on reducing pruritus and establishing disease control. Patients should be advised on basic skin care and avoidance of triggers. Topical anti-inflammatory agents should be considered in disease flares or chronic/recurrent lesions. In case of inadequate response, phototherapy, systemic immunosuppressants and, more recently, dupilumab, should be added. Nevertheless, the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis remains challenging and novel, efficacious, safe and targeted treatments are urgently needed. In conclusion, although the last few years have seen important improvement in the understanding of the disease, future research in atopic dermatitis will continue exploring gene-environment interactions and how it affects pathophysiology, disease severity, and treatment outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document