scholarly journals AB0184 ADHERENCE TO TREATMENT IN AN ITALIAN COHORT OF PATIENTS AFFECTED BY CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY ARTHROPATHIES TREATED WITH BIOLOGIC AGENTS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1391.2-1392
Author(s):  
M. Colaci ◽  
M. L. Aprile ◽  
Y. Dal Bosco ◽  
C. Schinocca
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Biologic Agents ◽  
Adherence To Treatment ◽  
Biologic Dmards ◽  
Psoriatic Arthropathy ◽  
Adherence Score ◽  
Articular Pain ◽  
Adherence To Therapy ◽  
Lower Adherence

Background:The lack of adherence to treatment in patients affected by chronic diseases, such as rheumatic diseases, remains a relevant issue. Indeed, “inefficacy” or “intolerance” to therapies prescribed could hide a scarce compliance of a considerable percentage of patients.Objectives:We aimed to evaluate the adherence to treatment in a series of patients affected by chronic inflammatory arthropathies treated with biologic agents.Methods:We recruited 175 consecutive patients (M/F: 56/120; mean age 52.6±12.3 years) affected by rheumatoid arthritis (98), psoriatic arthropathy (45) or ankylosing spondylitis (32) treated with subcutaneous biologic agents. All patients completed the Morisky Medication Adherence Scales (MMAS-8)1, in order to estimate their adherence to therapy. Moreover, we achieved from all cases the Patient Global Assessment (PGA), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for articular pain, the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and the report of eventual adverse events.Results:Considering MMAS-8, 23/175 (13.1%) patients were low adherent to treatment (score <6), and 59/175 (33.7%) presented medium-grade adherence (score 6-7).Adherence to treatments tended to be higher in males (mean MMAS-8 7.3±1.1 vs. 6.9±1.6; p=0.073), while it was not associated with age, education level, type of articular disease, presence of adverse events, or treatment with the type of traditional or biologic DMARDs.Higher mean levels of PGA (51.3 vs. 38.8; p=0.012), VAS (52.6 vs. 44.3; p=0.08), and HAQ (0.9 vs. 0.5; p=0.001) was reported in low-adherent patients compared with full adherent subjects.Conclusion:Our study confirmed that the percentage of patients showing low adherence to therapy is relevant. Moreover, the association of lower adherence to treatments with higher values of the subjective clinimetric indexes suggests to pay attention to the apparent ineffectiveness or loss of efficacy of therapy.References:[1]Morisky DE et al. J Clin Hypertens 2008; 10:348–354.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β-agonists combinations in real clinical practice: results of a multicenter cross-sectional study in Russian patients with asthma

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 613-626
Author(s):  
Vladimir V. Arkhipov ◽  
Zaurbek R. Aisanov ◽  
Sergey N. Avdeev
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Asthma Control ◽  
Inhalation Technique ◽  
Adherence To Treatment ◽  
Uncontrolled Asthma ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Adherence To Therapy ◽  
Real Clinical Practice

Asthma management approaches are improving yearly, but the problem of asthma control is still acute. Combinations of inhaled glucocorticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) play a crucial role in asthma therapy, but their effectiveness in real practice can be insufficient, and asthma control level in the population remains low. Optimizing the use of these drugs, changing the usual therapy regimens, and implementing upgraded inhalers can improve adherence to treatment and inhalation technique, which affects the effectiveness of the therapy.The study aimed to describe the key characteristics of the patient population getting asthma treatment in real clinical practice and assess factors influencing asthma control, including adherence to therapy.Methods. A single-stage cross-sectional observational study in 124 primary health care centers in 22 cities of the Russian Federation included 3,214 patients > 18 years old, with a clinical diagnosis of asthma for at least 1 year, who were able to perform a spirometry test and fill out the ACQ-5 and TAI-12 questionnaires.Results. Assessment of asthma control with the ACQ-5 questionnaire showed that most patients had uncontrolled asthma (56%). Controlled and partially controlled asthma was diagnosed in 21 and 19% of patients, respectively. 4% of patients had severe uncontrolled asthma. The TAI questionnaire revealed low adherence to therapy in more than half of the patients (53.6%). The rate of patients with controlled asthma and the average annual frequency of exacerbations were significantly lower in subgroups of patients who received therapy with extrafine ICS/LABA and ICS/formoterol in single inhaler regimen, compared with controller therapy using fixed and free combinations of ICS and LABA.Conclusion. The main causes of insufficient asthma control are low adherence to treatment, inhalation errors, monotherapy with ICS, asthma with small airways dysfunction, and adverse events associated with ICS. Prescribing the combinations of ICS/LABA in the form of extra-fine aerosol and using it in the Maintenance and Reliever Therapy (MART) regimen can significantly increase asthma control, reduce the risk of adverse events, and increase patient adherence to treatment. A potential alternative to improve asthma control is administering ICS-LABA combinations once daily.

scholarly journals O06 Baseline predictors of methotrexate-related adverse events in methotrexate-naïve patients with RA

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad A Sherbini ◽  
James M Gwinnutt ◽  
Kimme L Hyrich ◽  
Suzanne M M Verstappen ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Prevalence Rates ◽  
Clinical Predictors ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Related Data ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background/Aims  Methotrexate (MTX) is the most common treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The prevalence of adverse events (AEs) associated with MTX treatment for RA have been studied extensively, but there are limited data on the predictors of these AEs. This study aims to summarise the prevalence rates of MTX AEs, including gastrointestinal (GI), neurological, mucocutaneous, and elevated alanine transaminase (ALT) enzyme, and to identify baseline demographic and clinical predictors of these AEs. Methods  The Rheumatoid Arthritis Medication Study (RAMS) is a UK multi-centre prospective cohort study of patients with RA starting MTX for the first time. Relevant demographic, medication, clinical and disease related data were collected at baseline. AEs were reported at six and twelve months follow-ups. The prevalence rates of AEs were calculated based on the proportions of patients who reported having had an AE within one year of follow-up. The associations between candidate baseline predictors and AEs were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Results  A total of 2,089 patients were included with a mean age of 58.4 (standard deviation: 13.5) years, 1390 (66.5%) were women. 1,814 and 1,579 patients completed the 6 and 12 months follow-up visits, respectively. The prevalence rates of the AEs within one year of follow-up were: GI = 777 (40.6%), mucocutaneous = 441 (23.1%), neurological = 487 (25.5%), elevated ALT (&gt; upper limit of normal [ULN]) = 286 (15.5%). Younger age and being a woman were associated with increased risk of GI AEs, (age: OR 0.97 per year increase in age, 95% CI 0.98, 1.00; male sex: OR 0.58 vs female, 95% CI 0.46, 0.74) (Table 1). Higher baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score was an independent predictor of GI, mucocutaneous, and neurological AEs. Furthermore, having ALT &gt;1xULN at baseline or history of diabetes was associated with increased risk of subsequent ALT elevation during the study follow-up. Conclusion  In patients with RA starting MTX, GI AEs were the most commonly reported AEs during the first year of follow-up. The identified predictors of AEs may facilitate discussions between clinicians and patients prior to commencing MTX, and may lead to increased adherence and consequently improved effectiveness. Disclosure  A.A. Sherbini: None. J.M. Gwinnutt: Grants/research support; BMS. K.L. Hyrich: Member of speakers’ bureau; Abbvie. Grants/research support; Pfizer, UCB, BMS. S.M.M. Verstappen: Consultancies; Celltrion. Member of speakers’ bureau; Pfizer. Grants/research support; BMS.

scholarly journals POS0642 THE IMPACT OF AGE ON DISCONTINUATION OF BIOLOGIC DMARDs IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 559.2-560
Author(s):  
V. Rivera Teran ◽  
S. Sicsik ◽  
D. Vega-Morales ◽  
F. Irazoque-Palazuelos ◽  
D. Miranda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Retention Rate ◽  
Drug Discontinuation ◽  
Discontinuation Rate ◽  
Biologic Dmards ◽  
Conventional Dmards ◽  
The Impact

Background:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common autoimmune disease. Older patients treated with biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) are at a significantly greater risk of adverse effects (AEs) [1]. However, the rate of drug discontinuation because of adverse effects caused by bDMARDs has not differed in elderly compared to younger patients in different registries.Objectives:Determine if drug discontinuation of bDMARDs differs by age in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the Mexican Adverse Events Registry (BIOBADAMEX).Methods:BIOBADAMEX is a Mexican ongoing cohort of patients using bDMARDs since 2016. In this analysis we included all patients with diagnosis of RA with at least two assessments. Survival on bDMARDs was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Predictors of discontinuation, including age older than median age in the sample were investigated by Cox regression analyses.Results:Among 743 patients in the registry, 497 had RA diagnosis, from which, 214 had at least two assessments. At baseline, patients had a median (IQR) age of 53.4 (45-61) years old, median disease duration of 10.7 (6-17) months and median DAS28 of 4.7 (3-6). Conventional DMARDS were used by 185 (87%) patients and 94 (44%) patients used corticosteroids. Comorbidities were present in 194 (91%). The most common bDMARDs received at baseline were abatacept 59 (27%), tocilizumab 45(21%), adalimumab 31 (15%) and certolizumab 30 (14%). At the time of analysis, the median bDMARDs treatment duration was 21.0(13-34) months, 128 (59%) had discontinued treatment, 66 for inefficacy, 32 for adverse events and 30 for others. Fig 1 shows discontinuation rate curves in patients younger and older than median age. Cox proportional-hazards demonstrated no significant differences regarding age older than median age (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.4, p=0.7), female sex (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.7-1.9, p=0.44), use of corticosteroids (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9-1.6, p=0.20), comorbidities (HR 0.9, 95% 0.6-1.5, p=0.78), DAS28 (HR 0.9, 95% 0.9-1.1, p=0.93) or other factors.Figure 1.Discontinuation rate curves in patients younger and older than median age (< 53.4 and >=53.4 years old)Conclusion:This analysis did not show a role of age on discontinuation of bDMARDs in Mexican RA patients. Further longitudinal analyses will be performed including more patients to assess retention rate of bDMARDs and identify predictive variables of discontinuation in Mexican population.References:[1]Akter R, et al. Can Geriatr J. 2020 May 1;23(2):184-189.[2]Ikari Y, et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 24;99(52):e23861.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Clinical Significance of Serum Levels of ROM (Reactive Oxygen Metabolites) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Biologic Agents as a Predictor for the CDAI-, SDAI-, and Boolean-Remission

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arata Nakajima ◽  
Keiichiro Terayama ◽  
Masato Sonobe ◽  
Yorikazu Akatsu ◽  
Junya Saito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Reactive Oxygen ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Biologic Agents ◽  
Reactive Oxygen Metabolites ◽  
Matrix Metalloproteinase 3 ◽  
Oxygen Metabolites

Abstract We previously showed that reactive oxygen metabolites (ROM) serum levels were associated with the DAS28 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this study, we aimed to investigate whether ROM would be predictive of the CDAI-, SDAI- or Boolean-remission. Fifty-one biologic agents (BA)-naïve RA patients were included in this observational study. Associations between ROM, C-reactive protein (CRP), MMP (matrix metalloproteinase)-3, DAS28-ESR, CDAI, SDAI, and health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) at 12 weeks and the DAS28-, CDAI-, SDAI-, and Boolean-remission at 52 weeks were investigated. The DAS28-, CDAI-, SDAI- and Boolean-remission rates at 52 weeks were 66.7, 52.9, 54.9 and 54.9%, respectively. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that ROM and HAQ at 12 weeks were associated with the CDAI-, SDAI- and Boolean-remission at 52 weeks. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses demonstrated that the cut-off value for CDAI remission was 389.5 U.Carr, and that for SDAI and Boolean remission was 389.5 U.Carr. ROM at 12 weeks of initial treatment with BAs was a predictor for the CDAI-, SDAI-, and Boolean-remission at 52 weeks. Serum levels of ROM may be a useful biomarker in the current treatment strategy aiming at the early remission of RA.

Tolerance, survival and adherence to treatment with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

2019 ◽  
pp. 13-17
Author(s):  
J.M. Sevillano Gutierrez ◽  
D. Capelusnik ◽  
E.E. Schneeberger ◽  
G. Citera
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Descriptive Statistics ◽  
P Value ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression ◽  
Adherence To Treatment ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Cumulative Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Chi2 Test

Background: Methotrexate (MTX) is the most frequently used medication in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). However, several authors have questioned its success due to the presence of adverse events and the lack of adherence. Objectives: to determine cumulative survival of MTX, frequency and type of adverse events and causes of discontinuation in patients with RA. Methods: consecutive patients 18 years and older with a diagnosis of RA (ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria), who had begun treatment with MTX during their disease were included. Sociodemographic, clinical and therapeutic data were collected. Date of initiation and suspension of MTX, route of administration, concomitant treatments, consumption of coffee and tobacco, presence of adverse events (AE) were all consigned. Adherence was evaluated using the Compliance Questionnaire Rheumatology questionnaire 5-item summary version (CQR5). Statistical analysis: descriptive statistics. Chi2 test or Fisher’s exact test; Survival of treatment by Kaplan-Meier and log Rank. Multiple logistic regression. A p value <0.05 was considered significant.

scholarly journals Occurrence of adverse events in patients with JIA receiving biologic agents: long-term follow-up in a real-life setting

Rheumatology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 1170-1176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarit Tarkiainen ◽  
Pirjo Tynjälä ◽  
Paula Vähäsalo ◽  
Pekka Lahdenne
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Biologic Agents ◽  
Real Life Setting ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

THU0172 Adverse Events to Biologic Agents in Elderly Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Cohort with 13 Years of Follow-up: Table 1

2015 ◽  
Vol 74 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 256.2-256
Author(s):  
Z. Rosales Rosado ◽  
D. Freites Núñez ◽  
A. Gόmez Gόmez ◽  
L. Arietti Lόpez ◽  
P. Macarrόn Pérez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Biologic Agents ◽  
Rheumatoid Arthritis Cohort

Mixed Treatment Comparison of the Treatment Discontinuations of Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis

2012 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 1491-1505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rishi J Desai ◽  
Richard A Hansen ◽  
Jaya K Rao ◽  
Tania M Wilkins ◽  
Elizabeth A Harden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mixed Treatment Comparison ◽  
Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs ◽  
Antirheumatic Drugs ◽  
Biologic Dmards ◽  
Treatment Comparison ◽  
Mixed Treatment ◽  
Disease Modifying

BACKGROUND: Introduction of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has considerably changed treatment options for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over the past decade. Very little information is available on comparative discontinuation rates of the biologics. OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment discontinuations for 9 biologic DMARDs in adults with RA. METHODS: We searched electronic databases through May 2012 to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with RA that compared biologic DMARDs with placebo or another biologic DMARD. The primary outcome was treatment discontinuation during the blinded phase of the trials, measured as overall withdrawals, withdrawals resulting from lack of efficacy, and withdrawals resulting from adverse events. Random-effects meta-analysis estimated the effect size for individual agents, and adjusted indirect comparisons were made between biologics using mixed treatment comparisons (MTC) meta-analysis. RESULTS: Forty-four trials were included in the analysis. In comparison with placebo, biologics were less likely to be withdrawn because of lack of efficacy (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.27) and more likely to be withdrawn because of an adverse event (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.70). Based on the MTC, certolizumab had the most favorable overall withdrawal profile, followed by etanercept and rituximab. Certolizumab had lower relative withdrawal rates resulting from lack of efficacy than adalimumab, anakinra, and infliximab. Anakinra had higher relative withdrawal rates resulting from lack of efficacy than most other biologics. Certolizumab and infliximab had more, while etanercept had fewer, withdrawals because of adverse events than most other drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Based on MTC using data from RCTs, differences in discontinuation rates were observed, generally favoring certolizumab, etanercept, and rituximab over other biologic DMARDs. These potential differences need to be further explored in head-to-head trials or well-conducted observational studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document