Excellent outcome of minimal residual disease-defined low-risk patients is sustained with more than 10 years follow-up: results of UK paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia trials 1997–2003

2016 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 449-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Bartram ◽  
Rachel Wade ◽  
Ajay Vora ◽  
Jeremy Hancock ◽  
Chris Mitchell ◽  
...  

BackgroundMinimal residual disease (MRD) is defined as the presence of sub-microscopic levels of leukaemia. Measurement of MRD from bone marrow at the end of induction chemotherapy (day 28) for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) can highlight a large group of patients (>40%) with an excellent (>90%) short-term event-free survival (EFS). However, follow-up in recent published trials is relatively short, raising concerns about using this result to infer the safety of further therapy reduction in the future.MethodsWe examined MRD data on 225 patients treated on one of three UKALL trials between 1997 and 2003 to assess the long-term (>10 years follow-up) outcome of those patients who had low-risk MRD (<0.01%) at day 28.ResultsOur pilot data define a cohort of 53% of children with MRD <0.01% at day 28 who have an EFS of 91% and long-term overall survival of 97%. Of 120 patients with day-28 MRD <0.01% and extended follow-up, there was one death due to treatment-related toxicity, one infectious death while in complete remission, and four relapse deaths.ConclusionsThe excellent outcome for childhood ALL in patients with MRD <0.01% after induction chemotherapy is sustained for more than 10 years from diagnosis. This supports the potential exploration of further reduction of therapy in this group, in an attempt to reduce treatment-related mortality and late effects.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1093-1093
Author(s):  
Gareth Gerrard ◽  
Wayne Mitchell ◽  
Anthony Goldstone ◽  
Raj Chopra ◽  
Georgina Buck ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) monitoring in BCR-ABL+ acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is a valuable tool in the management of Philadelphia positive adult ALL due to the markedly poor prognosis engendered by this leukemia subtype. As part of the UKALLXII trial we received samples from 104 de novo adult ALL patients, 26 of which (25%) were found to be BCR-ABL+. BM and PB received at presentation and during chemotherapy or post SCT were tested for MRD as part of a modified UKALLXII trial protocol which aimed at assessing the efficacy of combined chemotherapy and Imatinib treatment and SCT. Aims: 1) To establish which sample source offers the highest level of sensitivity; 2) To determine if differences in disease level is associated with the BCR-Abl rearrangement exhibited. Methods: BM and/or PB samples were received at presentation and at monthly follow-up points and were tested by quantitative real-time PCR (QRT-PCR) using a Roche LightCycler 1.3 with the SYBR-green fluorescent detection system. The BCR-ABL transcript levels were normalised as a ratio against Abl levels. Operating procedures were adapted from the recommendations of the European Study Group for MRD in ALL. Results: 138 samples (65 PB, 73 BM) were analysed from 26 BCR-ABL+ patients: 15M, 11F; median age 43y (range 17y to 58y). 17 (65%) were found to be minor and nine (35%) were major. Ten patients have received Imatinib and nine have undergone transplant (7 allo-SCT, 2 autograft). 2 patients have relapsed and 2 have died (1 following relapse). Paired t-tests between PB and BM sample BCR-Abl transcript levels show that BM offers a significantly higher level of sensitivity with a median BCR-ABL level of 2.93 x 10−4 against 1.8 x 10−4 for PB (p= 0.0056, n=46). Baseline ABL levels show the converse (1.49 x 104 BM against 1.77 x 104 PB, p= 0.016, n=46) suggesting that the generally greater quantity of material associated with PB samples may result in higher quality RNA. BCR-Abl levels between major and minor patients show that patients exhibiting the major form have significantly higher levels of disease in both PB (median 3.1 x 10−2 major (n= 24) against 3.3x10−4 in patients exhibiting minor BCR-Abl (n=41), (p< 0.0001) and BM samples (median 2.0 x 10−2 major (n= 28) against 3.3 x 10−4 minor (n=45), (p= 0.0009). Paired sequential analysis for 11 patients with 2 or more follow-up samples confirms this observation (median 3.5 x 10−2 major (n=4) against 3.5 x 10−4 minor (n=7), (p= 0.008). Conclusions: In the QRT-PCR MRD monitoring of adult ALL BM samples offer a small but significantly higher level of sensitivity than PB samples. Patients exhibiting the major BCR-ABL rearrangement have significantly higher levels of disease than patients with the minor form. These data describing differential disease status within the BCR-ABL+ subgroup and variance due to sample type may be important in providing guidelines for patient management.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1335-1335
Author(s):  
Nahid Zareian ◽  
Bella Patel ◽  
Lena Rai-Shetty ◽  
Clare Rowntree ◽  
Andrew McMillan ◽  
...  

Abstract Minimal residual disease (MRD) testing is vital to risk assignment in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Quantification of patient-specific rearrangements of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor (Ig/TCR) genes is the most standardised method in current use. Recent studies demonstrated that deletion in the IKZF1 gene is common and is prognostic of poor outcome. IKZF1 targets could offer potential for MRD monitoring in BCR-ABLnegative (neg) ALL. The 5' and 3' break points of this deletion are highly conserved, making it possible to design a universal PCR assay to amplify the fusion genomic sequence created by the deletion. With the initial aim of developing an MRD assay we studied the incidence of IKZF1 Δ 4-7 in 161 consecutive patients enrolled on the on-going adult ALL trial UKALL14, aged 25-59 years. We carried out PCR using breakpoint-specific primers designed as close as possible to the breakpoint. In order to ensure that the screening PCR enabled sensitive detection of the deletions, serial dilution of a positive control SUP-B15 cell line diluted into non-tumoral DNA was analysed. IKZF1 Δ 4-7 could be detected with a sensitivity of at least 10-4 (0.01%). PCR bands could be readily allocated to “strong” or “weak” on visual inspection; all PCR positive signals were confirmed as IKZF1 Δ 4-7 by Sanger sequencing of the PCR products and the breakpoints mapped. The frequency of the deletion in the total population studied was 80/161 (50%); 23/35 (66%) in the BCR-ABL positive (pos) subgroup and strikingly 57/126 (45%) in the BCR-ABLneg subgroup. The high rate of IKZF1 Δ 4-7 in the BCR-ABLneg patients was unexpected, being approximately double the reported incidence BCR-ABLneg adults. Real time quantitative (RQ)-PCR analyses to investigate the suitability of IKZF1 quantitation as the basis for an MRD assay was performed on 26 BCR-ABLneg cases, selected only on the basis of availability of follow-up material. Assays were assessed using the same criteria applied by EuroMRD for Ig/TCR quantification. On that basis, “limited testing” of PCR amplifications at the 10-2 (1%) and 10-4(0.01%) dilution points was performed on all 26 samples. To our surprise, only 5 samples gave acceptable data to qualify for a quantitative MRD assay. Notably, all the 21 cases that failed “limited testing” had yielded a weak PCR signal on initial screening, suggesting the PCR assay have detected intragenic deletions restricted to minor subclones. Although subclonal IKZF1 gene alterations are well described, the apparent high frequency of these events in our cohort (21/26 tested for RQ-PCR assay) was surprising. To further analyse this, we performed MRD-based genomic quantification of all 26 diagnostic specimens using SUP-B15 dilution series. The percentage of ALL cells bearing IKZF1 Δ 4-7 in the putative 21 subclonal cases was <0.01% compared to >90% in the putative 5 major clonal cases. In total, 82% of BCR-ABLneg cases gave a weak PCR band at initial screening, suggesting that most of the Δ 4-7 in BCR-ABLneg adult ALL are subclonal. In the 5 cases where a quantifiable IKZF1 Δ 4-7-based MRD assay could be developed, MRD analysis was performed on 12 follow-up samples and sensitivity and quantitative range of at least 10-4 (0.01%) and 5×10-4 (0.05%) were obtained, respectively. These parameters compare favourably with the performance of standard Ig/TCR assays. Notably in one sample MRD could only be quantified by the IKZF1 deletion approach (level= 7.79E-05, ∼ 0.008%). IKZF1 lesions are not leukaemia-initiating events, hence the stability of this alteration during the history of ALL is not clear. To address this, 14 diagnosis and relapse paired samples were analysed. Three different patterns emerged: in 5 cases the IKZF1 Δ 4-7 at diagnosis was preserved at relapse; in 3 cases the lesion was newly acquired at relapse; and in 3 cases the deletion was lost at relapse, notably all these 3 cases had showed a weak PCR signal, suggesting the deletion which was lost at relapse was subclonal at diagnosis. Theoretically this observation suggests that IKZF1deletion-based MRD monitoring carries a risk of missing a resurgent clone. In conclusion, IKZF1 Δ 4-7 can provide highly sensitive MRD assays and could be a potential candidate to add to the repertoire of currently available MRD markers. However, we have shown limited applicability due to many IKZF1 deletions occurring in putative subclones. The stability of these deletions in major clones remains to be determined. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document