Improved pain, physical functioning and health status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with CP-690,550, an orally active Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor: results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Objectives:To determine the efficacy of CP-690,550 in improving pain, function and health status in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate or a tumour necrosis factor α inhibitor.Methods:Patients were randomised equally to placebo, CP-690,550 5, 15 or 30 mg twice daily for 6 weeks, with 6 weeks’ follow-up. The patient’s assessment of arthritis pain (pain), patient’s assessment of disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) were recorded.Results:At week 6, significantly more patients in the CP-690,550 5, 15 and 30 mg twice-daily groups experienced a 50% improvement in pain compared with placebo (44%, 66%, 78% and 14%, respectively), clinically meaningful reductions in HAQ-DI (⩾0.3 units) (57%, 75%, 76% and 36%, respectively) and clinically meaningful improvements in SF-36 domains and physical and mental components.Conclusions:CP-690,550 was efficacious in improving the pain, function and health status of patients with RA, from week 1 to week 6.

Download Full-text

Patient-reported outcomes for tofacitinib with and without methotrexate, or adalimumab with methotrexate, in rheumatoid arthritis: a phase IIIB/IV trial

RMD Open ◽

10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001040 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 5 (2) ◽

pp. e001040 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Vibeke Strand ◽

Eduardo Mysler ◽

Robert J Moots ◽

Gene V Wallenstein ◽

Ryan DeMasi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Short Form ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Inadequate Response ◽

Link Type ◽

Combination Treatments ◽

Sf 36 ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Phase Iiib

ObjectiveTo provide the first direct comparison of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following treatment with tofacitinib monotherapy versus tofacitinib or adalimumab (ADA) in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with inadequate response to MTX (MTX-IR).MethodsORAL Strategy (NCT02187055), a phase IIIB/IV, head-to-head, randomised controlled trial, assessed non-inferiority between tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day monotherapy, tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day+MTX and ADA 40 mg every other week+MTX. PROs assessed included the following: Patient Global Assessment of disease activity (PtGA), Pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) summary and domain scores.ResultsSubstantial improvements from baseline were reported across all PROs in all treatment arms, which, in the majority, met or exceeded minimum clinically important differences. Compared with tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib+MTX combination treatment conferred significantly greater improvements in PtGA, Pain and SF-36 physical component summary scores at month 6. Statistically or numerically greater improvements were often, but not uniformly, reported for combination treatments compared with tofacitinib monotherapy at other time points.ConclusionTreatment with tofacitinib+MTX, ADA+MTX and tofacitinib monotherapy resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in PROs in MTX-IR patients with RA. These were comparatively greater with combination treatments versus tofacitinib monotherapy, although differences between treatment arms were small, limiting our ability to confer clinical meaning.Trial registration numberNCT02187055.

Download Full-text

P133 Filgotinib in patients with RA with inadequate response to methotrexate: FINCH 1 52-week efficacy and patient reported outcomes data

Rheumatology ◽

10.1093/rheumatology/keab247.129 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

David Walker ◽

Alan Kivitz ◽

Yoshiya Tanaka ◽

Susan Lee ◽

Lei Ye ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Short Form ◽

Pain Scale ◽

Janus Kinase ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Stock Ownership ◽

Inadequate Response ◽

Research Support ◽

Double Blind ◽

Sf 36 ◽

Patient Reported

Abstract Background/Aims Filgotinib (FIL) is an oral, potent, selective Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor. FINCH 1 (NCT02889796) assessed FIL efficacy, safety and patient reported outcome (PRO) data in patients (pts) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR). We report data through week 52 (W52) of the FINCH 1 study. Primary outcome results at week (W)12 and W24 were previously reported. Methods This global, phase 3, double-blind, active- and placebo (PBO)-controlled study randomised MTX-IR pts with active RA on a background of stable MTX 3:3:2:3 to oral FIL 200 mg or FIL 100 mg once daily, subcutaneous adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg every 2W, or PBO up to W52; pts receiving PBO at W24 were re-randomised to FIL 100 or 200 mg. Efficacy was assessed using clinical, radiographic, and pt-reported outcomes; W52 comparisons were not adjusted for multiplicity, and nominal p-values are reported. Safety endpoints included types and rates of adverse events (AEs) and laboratory abnormalities. PRO assessment included the HAQ-DI and VAS pain scale, SF-36, and FACIT-Fatigue questionnaire. Change from baseline (CFB) at various time points was assessed up to W52 for each treatment group. Results Of 1,755 treated pts, 1,417 received study drug through W52. FIL efficacy was sustained through W52 with DAS28(CRP) <2.6 remission rates of 54%, 43%, and 46% of pts receiving FIL 200 and 100 mg and ADA, respectively, (nominal p for FIL 200 vs ADA = 0.024) (Table 1). FIL safety profile through W52 was consistent with W24 data. AEs of interest were infrequent and balanced among treatments. As early as W2, through W24, pts receiving either dose of FIL experienced nominally significantly greater (p < 0.001) CFB in HAQ-DI and VAS pain scale than those receiving PBO. These improvements were sustained up to W52. In general, CFB for HAQ-DI, VAS pain scale, and FACIT-Fatigue observed for the FIL groups was higher or comparable to ADA through W52 (Table 1). P133 Table 1:Efficacy and PRO outcomes at Week 52Efficacy OutcomeFIL 200 mg (n = 475)FIL 100 mg (n = 480)ADA (n = 325)ACR20/50/70, %a78/62/4476/59/3874/59/39DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2, %a66+5959mTSSb,c0.18+++0.450.61HAQ-DIc,d−0.93+−0.85−0.85VAS pain scalec,d−42−40−40SF-36 PCSc,d12.011.512.4FACIT-Fc,d11.912.211.7aNon-responder imputation,bLeast squares mean change from baseline,cObserved case,dMean change from baseline.+nominal p < 0.05, +++nominal p < 0.001 vs ADA ADA, adalimumab; FACIT-F, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue; FIL, filgotinib; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; mTSS, modified van der Heijde TSS; SF-36, 36-Item Short Form Survey. Conclusion Through W52, both FIL 200 and 100 mg showed sustained efficacy, rapid and sustained improvement in patient QoL based on clinical and pt-reported outcomes and were well tolerated in MTX-IR pts with RA. Disclosure D. Walker: Consultancies; Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche. A. Kivitz: Consultancies; AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Flexion, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Regeneron, SUN Pharma Advanced Research, Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Pfizer, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Novartis. Member of speakers’ bureau; Celgene, Merck, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Genzyme, Flexion, AbbVie. Y. Tanaka: Honoraria; AbbVie, Asahi Kasei, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and Y. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Takeda and UCB. S. Lee: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. L. Ye: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. H. Hu: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. F. Matzkies: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. B. Bartok: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. B. Bartok: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Y. Guo: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. J.S. Sundy: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. A. Jahreis: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. R. Besuyen: Shareholder/stock ownership; Galapagos BV. Other; Employee of Galapagos BV. B. Combe: Other; Reports research support, honoraria, consulting and speaker fees from AbbVie; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly & Co.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Janssen; Novartis; Pfizer; Roche-Chugai; Sanofi; and UCB. D. van der Heijde: Consultancies; AbbVie; Amgen; Astellas; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Boehringer Ingelheim; Celgene; Cyxone; Daiichi-Sankyo; Eisai; Eli Lilly & Co.; Galapagos; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Glaxo-Smith-Kline; Janssen;, Merck; Novartis; Pfizer; Regeneron; Roche; Sanofi; Takeda; and UCB. J. Simon-Campos: None. H.S.B. Baraf: Grants/research support; AbbVie; Horizon; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Pfizer; Janssen; and Merck. U. Kumar: None. C. Tasset: Shareholder/stock ownership; Galapagos NV. Other; Employee of Galapagos NV. N. Mozaffarian: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. R.B.M. Landewé: Consultancies; AbbVie; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly & Co.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Galapagos NV; Novartis; Pfizer; and UCB. S. Bae: None. E. Keystone: Other; Reports research support, consulting, and speaker fees from AbbVie; Amgen; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Celltrion; F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd.; Genentech, Inc; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Janssen; Lilly, ; Merck; Myriad Autoimmune; Pfizer; PuraPharm; Sandoz; Sanofi-Genzyme; Samsung Bioepsis; and UCB. P. Nash: Other; Reports research support, consulting, and speaker and personal fees from AbbVie; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Celgene; Eli Lilly & Co.; Gilead Sciences, Inc; Janssen; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Novartis; Pfizer;, Roche; Sanofi; and UCB.

Download Full-text

P128 A subgroup analysis of the efficacy of filgotinib for patients with moderately active RA following an inadequate response to methotrexate

Rheumatology ◽

10.1093/rheumatology/keab247.123 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Maya H Buch ◽

David Walker ◽

Patrick D W Kiely ◽

Christopher J Edwards ◽

Jane Barry ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Activity ◽

Short Form ◽

Health Assessment ◽

Physical Component Score ◽

Inadequate Response ◽

Research Support ◽

Reactive Protein ◽

American College Of Rheumatology ◽

Moderate Disease ◽

Sf 36

Abstract Background/Aims Filgotinib is an oral, preferential janus kinase 1 inhibitor. FINCH 1 (NCT02889796) was a phase III, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled study evaluating filgotinib efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX; MTX-IR). Methods MTX-IR patients with moderately or severely active RA were randomised (3:3:2:3) to filgotinib 200 mg daily, filgotinib 100 mg daily, adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks, or placebo on a background of stable MTX for up to 52 weeks. An exploratory subgroup analysis of FINCH 1 was conducted in patients with moderately active RA based on Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP])>3.2-≤5.1 at baseline. Proportion of patients achieving 20%/50%/70% improvement from baseline in American College of Rheumatology core criteria (ACR20/50/70), DAS28(CRP)≤3.2, DAS28(CRP)<2.6, change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Short Form-36 Physical Component Score (SF-36 PCS), patient-reported pain, and modified total Sharp/van der Heijde score (mTSS) were assessed at week (W)12 and W24. All analyses were exploratory without multiplicity adjustment; nominal P-values are reported. Results Of 1,755 treated patients, 24% had moderate disease at baseline with similar proportions (21.9%-26.9%) across treatment groups. In each treatment arm, baseline characteristics were well balanced for the moderate disease activity subpopulation. The majority (77%) were female, mean (standard deviation [SD]) duration of RA was 7.8 (7.7) years; mean (SD) baseline DAS28(CRP) was 4.6 (0.42). At W12 and W24, proportions achieving ACR20/50/70, DAS28(CRP)<2.6, and DAS28(CRP)≤3.2 were significantly higher for both filgotinib doses relative to placebo (Table). Improvement in HAQ-DI was significantly greater vs placebo at W12 but not W24 for both filgotinib doses (Table 1). For both doses of filgotinib vs placebo, SF-36 PCS and pain were significantly improved and there was numerically less radiographic progression as assessed by mTSS at W12 and W24 (Table). Composite disease activity, HAQ-DI, and mTSS scores with both filgotinib doses were comparable to adalimumab. P128 Table 1:Efficacy outcomes at week 12 and week 24Week 12Week 24FIL 200 mg (n = 104)FIL 100 mg (n = 121)ADA (n = 72)PBO (n = 128)FIL 200 mg (n = 104)FIL 100 mg (n = 121)ADA (n = 72)PBO (n = 128)ACR2077.9***67.8***65.343.872.1**75.2***68.154.7ACR5043.3***37.2***41.716.452.9***47.1**56.930.5ACR7019.2***17.4***15.33.932.7***29.8**29.213.3DAS28 (CRP)<2.647.1***37.2***44.415.661.5***46.3***50.023.4DAS28 (CRP)≤3.267.3***63.6***66.739.174.0***73.6***62.549.2ΔHAQ-DI−0.51a,***−0.40b,*−0.47c−0.28d−0.57e−0.53f−0.65g−0.48hΔmTSS0.02i0.06j0.03k0.16l−0.04m,*0.11n−0.01o0.21pΔSF-36 PCS7.8q,***6.4r,***7.0s3.7t8.8u,**7.2v,*9.5w5.8xΔPain, mm−24***−23***−23−12−28***−28***−28−21***P<0.001 vs PBO;**P<0.01 vs PBO;*P<0.05 vs PBO; all P-values are nominal. Binary efficacy endpoints were compared between FIL and PBO using Fisher's exact test. Comparisons of change from baseline between FIL vs PBO were conducted using mixed-effects models for repeated measures including treatment group, visit, treatment group by visit, baseline value as fixed effects, and subjects as random effect.an = 98;bn = 114;cn = 67;dn = 117;en = 89;fn = 108;gn = 61;hn = 100;in = 94;jn = 113;kn = 62;ln = 112;mn = 89;nn = 105;on = 60;pn = 97;qn = 99;rn = 116;sn = 67;tn = 118;un = 91;vn = 109;wn = 62;xn = 100.ΔHAQ-DI, change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; ΔmTSS, change from baseline in modified total Sharp/van der Heijde score; ΔSF-36 PCS, change from baseline in Short Form-36 Physical Component Score; ACR, American College of Rheumatology; ADA, adalimumab; DAS28(CRP), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C-reactive protein; FIL, filgotinib; PBO, placebo. Conclusion In a subgroup of patients from FINCH 1 with baseline moderately active RA, significantly greater improvements in disease activity were observed with both filgotinib doses over placebo and associated with lower radiographic progression and reduced functional deficit. Disclosure M.H. Buch: Consultancies; MHB reports serving as a consultant for AbbVie; Eli Lilly; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Sandoz; Sanofi; and Serono. Grants/research support; MHB reports grants or research support from Pfizer, Roche, and UCB. D. Walker: Grants/research support; DW has received funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Novartis; and Pfizer, Inc. P.D.W. Kiely: Other; PK has attended advisory boards, been part of a speakers bureau, or received support to attend educational meetings from AbbVie, Gilead, Lilly, Novartis, and Sanofi. C.J. Edwards: Consultancies; CJE has provided consultancy for AbbVie; Biogen; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Celgene; Eli Lilly; Fresenius; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; GSK; Janssen; MSD; Mundipharma; Pfizer; Roche; Samsung; and Sanofi. Member of speakers’ bureau; CJE has served on speaker's bureaus for AbbVie; Biogen; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Celgene; Eli Lilly; Fresenius; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; GSK; Janssen; MSD; Mundipharma; Pfizer; Roche; Samsung; and Sanofi. Grants/research support; CJE reports grants from AbbVie; Biogen; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Celgene; Eli Lilly; Fresenius; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; GSK; Janssen; MSD; Mundipharma; Pfizer; Roche; Samsung; and Sanofi. J. Barry: Corporate appointments; JB is an employee of Gilead Sciences Ltd. G. McCaughey: Corporate appointments; GMcC is an employee of Gilead Sciences Ltd. L. Akroyd: Corporate appointments; LA is an employee of Gilead Sciences Ltd. I. Tiamiyu: Corporate appointments; IT is an employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. L. Ye: Corporate appointments; LY is an employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. K. Chen: Corporate appointments; KC is an employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. P.C. Taylor: Consultancies; PCT has served as a consultant to AbbVie, Biogen, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, BMS, Roche, Sanofi, Nordic Pharma, Fresenius, and UCB. Grants/research support; PCT reports research grants from Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Galapagos, and Celgene.

Download Full-text

ASP5094, a humanized monoclonal antibody against integrin alpha-9, did not show efficacy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to methotrexate: results from a phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Arthritis Research & Therapy ◽

10.1186/s13075-020-02336-3 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Tsutomu Takeuchi ◽

Yoshiya Tanaka ◽

Jay Erdman ◽

Yuichiro Kaneko ◽

Masako Saito ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Monoclonal Antibody ◽

Biological Activity ◽

Disease Onset ◽

Response Rates ◽

Janus Kinase ◽

P Value ◽

Inadequate Response ◽

Primary Efficacy ◽

Double Blind

Abstract Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, debilitating autoimmune condition characterized by joint synovial inflammation. Current treatments include methotrexate (MTX), biologic agents, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. However, these agents are not efficacious in all patients and there are concerns regarding side effects and risk of infection as these treatments target immune-related pathways. Overexpression and activation of integrin alpha-9 (α9) on fibroblast-like synoviocytes are associated with RA disease onset and exacerbation. The humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody ASP5094 was designed to inhibit human α9 and is currently under investigation for the treatment of RA. Methods This phase 2a, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study (NCT03257852) evaluated the efficacy, safety, and biological activity of intravenous ASP5094 10 mg/kg in patients with moderate to severe RA that was refractory to MTX. Patients received ASP5094 or placebo every 4 weeks for a total of three administrations. Both treatment groups used concomitant MTX. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who responded per American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement using C-reactive protein (ACR50-CRP) after 12 weeks of treatment. Biological activity of ASP5094 was assessed via pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of known downstream effectors of α9. Safety was also assessed. Results Sixty-six patients were enrolled and randomized to placebo (n = 33) or ASP5094 (n = 33). In the primary efficacy analysis, ACR50-CRP response rates were 6.3% and 18.2% at week 12 in the ASP5094 and placebo groups, respectively; a difference of − 11.9, which was not significant (2-sided P value = 0.258). No trends in ACR50 response rates were observed in subgroups based on demographics or baseline disease characteristics, and no significant differences between placebo and ASP5094 were identified in secondary efficacy or pharmacodynamic endpoints, despite achievement of target serum concentrations of ASP5094. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate in severity, and ASP5094 was considered safe and well tolerated overall. Conclusion Although no notable safety signals were observed in this study, ASP5094 was not efficacious in patients with moderate to severe RA with an inadequate response to MTX. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03257852. Registered on 22 Aug. 2017

Download Full-text

Efficacy and safety of the selective co-stimulation modulator abatacept following 2 years of treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/ard.2007.074773 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 67 (4) ◽

pp. 547-554 ◽

Cited By ~ 180

Author(s):

M C Genovese ◽

M Schiff ◽

M Luggen ◽

J-C Becker ◽

R Aranda ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Sleep Problems ◽

Inadequate Response ◽

C Reactive Protein ◽

Double Blind ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Reactive Protein ◽

Sf 36

Objective:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of abatacept during 2 years of the ATTAIN (Abatacept Trial in Treatment of Anti-TNF INadequate responders) trial in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Methods:Patients completing the 6-month, double-blind period were eligible to enter the long-term extension; patients received abatacept ∼10 mg/kg, plus disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Safety and efficacy (American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria responses, DAS28 (C-reactive protein), HAQ-DI, SF-36, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problems Index, fatigue VAS) were assessed through 2 years.Results:317 patients (218 from the abatacept and 99 from the placebo group) entered and 222 (70%) completed 18 months of long-term extension treatment. The incidence and type of adverse events were consistent between the double-blind and cumulative (double-blind plus long-term extension) periods. Rates of serious adverse events were 25.6 and 23.4 per 100 patient-years in the double-blind versus cumulative period. At 6 months and 2 years, using non-responder analyses, ACR responses in abatacept-treated patients were: ACR 20, 59.4% and 56.2%; ACR 50, 23.5% and 33.2%; ACR 70, 11.5% and 16.1%; HAQ-DI responses were 54.4% and 47.9%. At 6 months and 2 years, using post-hoc as-observed analyses, the percentage of patients (95% confidence interval) achieving DAS28 (C-reactive protein) low disease activity score (⩽3.2) and DAS28 (C-reactive protein)-defined remission (<2.6) increased from 18.3% (13.0, 23.5) to 32.0% (24.6, 39.4) and 11.1% (6.8, 15.3) to 20.3% (13.9, 26.6). Clinically meaningful improvements in SF-36, pain, fatigue and sleep problems were also maintained throughout the 2 years of abatacept treatment.Conclusion:No unique safety observations were reported during open-label exposure. Improvements in the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis, physical function and health-related quality of life observed after 6 months, were maintained throughout the 2 years in this population with difficult-to-treat disease.Trial registration number:NCT00124982.

Download Full-text

Effects of RANKL inhibition on promoting healing of bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis using HR-pQCT: a 2-year, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-219846 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. annrheumdis-2021-219846

Author(s):

Ho So ◽

Isaac T Cheng ◽

Sze-Lok Lau ◽

Evelyn Chow ◽

Tommy Lam ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Bone Erosion ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Health Assessment ◽

Joint Space ◽

Double Blind Study ◽

Quantitative Ct ◽

Double Blind ◽

Registration Number

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of denosumab on erosion healing at 2–4 metacarpophalangeal (MCP) head as determined by high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with stable disease.MethodsThis was a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Patients with RA with disease activity score 28 joints (DAS28) ≤5.1 were randomised (1:1) to subcutaneous denosumab 60 mg or placebo once every 6 months for 24 months. The primary outcome was erosion healing at MCP 2–4 on HR-pQCT at 12 months. The effects of denosumab on erosion and joint space parameters on HR-pQCT and radiographs, disease activity and health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) were also examined.ResultsAt 24 months, HR-pQCT images were analysed in 98 patients. One-third of the patients achieved sustained low disease activity throughout the study. At 12 months, changes in erosion parameters on HR-pQCT were similar between the two groups. At 24 months, new erosions (19% vs 9%, p=0.009) and erosion progression (18% vs 8%, p=0.019) were more common in the placebo group than the denosumab group. Erosion healing was seen in a significantly higher proportion of patients in the denosumab group (20% vs 6%, p=0.045) at 24 months. No significant changes in joint space parameters on HR-pQCT, van der Heijde-Sharp erosion score, DAS28 and HAQ-DI were observed in the two groups at 12 and 24 months.ConclusionAlthough no differences in erosion parameters were observed at 12 months, denosumab was more efficacious than placebo in erosion repair on HR-pQCT after 24 months.Trial registration numberNCT03239080.

Download Full-text

Administration of an Amino Acid–Based Regimen for the Management of Autonomic Nervous System Dysfunction Related to Combat-Induced Illness

Journal of Central Nervous System Disease ◽

10.4137/jcnsd.s13793 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 6 ◽

pp. JCNSD.S13793

Author(s):

William E Shell ◽

Marcus Charuvastra ◽

Mira Breitstein ◽

Stephanie L. Pavlik ◽

Anthony Charuvastra ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mental Health ◽

Amino Acid ◽

Short Form ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Initial Study ◽

Nutritional Deficiencies ◽

Autonomic Nervous System Dysfunction ◽

Double Blind ◽

Average Decrease ◽

Sf 36

The etiology and pathophysiology of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) remains poorly understood. The nutritional deficiencies associated with the altered metabolic processes of PTSD have not previously been studied in detail. This pilot study measured the reduction in symptoms in 21 military veterans reporting moderate to severe symptoms associated with PTSD. Two amino acid-based medical foods specifically formulated with biogenic amines and other nutrients were administered to study subjects targeting specific neurotransmitter deficiencies resulting from altered metabolic activity associated with PTSD. This study included the Physician Checklist – Military (PCL-M), Short Form General Health Survey (SF-36), and Epworth Sleepiness Scale to measure the change in each subject's score after 30 days of administration. An average decrease of 17 points was seen in the PCL-M, indicating a reduction in PTSD symptoms ( P < 0.001). The mental health component of the SF-36 showed an average 57% increase in the subjects’ mental health rating ( P < 0.001). The results of this initial study demonstrate that addressing the increased dietary requirements of PTSD can improve symptoms of the disease while eliminating significant side effects. A larger, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial is warranted.

Download Full-text

Tocilizumab in early progressive rheumatoid arthritis: FUNCTION, a randomised controlled trial

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207628 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 75 (6) ◽

pp. 1081-1091 ◽

Cited By ~ 99

Author(s):

Gerd R Burmester ◽

William F Rigby ◽

Ronald F van Vollenhoven ◽

Jonathan Kay ◽

Andrea Rubbert-Roth ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Randomised Controlled Trial ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Physical Function ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Health Assessment ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Double Blind ◽

Treatment Groups ◽

Randomised Controlled

ObjectivesThe efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ), an anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, has not previously been evaluated in a population consisting exclusively of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsIn a double-blind randomised controlled trial (FUNCTION), 1162 methotrexate (MTX)-naive patients with early progressive RA were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to one of four treatment groups: 4 mg/kg TCZ+MTX, 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX, 8 mg/kg TCZ+placebo and placebo+MTX (comparator group). The primary outcome was remission according to Disease Activity Score using 28 joints (DAS28–erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) <2.6) at week 24. Radiographic and physical function outcomes were also evaluated. We report results through week 52.ResultsThe intent-to-treat population included 1157 patients. Significantly more patients receiving 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX and 8 mg/kg TCZ+placebo than receiving placebo+MTX achieved DAS28-ESR remission at week 24 (45% and 39% vs 15%; p<0.0001). The 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX group also achieved significantly greater improvement in radiographic disease progression and physical function at week 52 than did patients treated with placebo+MTX (mean change from baseline in van der Heijde–modified total Sharp score, 0.08 vs 1.14 (p=0.0001); mean reduction in Health Assessment Disability Index, −0.81 vs −0.64 (p=0.0024)). In addition, the 8 mg/kg TCZ+placebo and 4 mg/kg TCZ+MTX groups demonstrated clinical efficacy that was at least as effective as MTX for these key secondary endpoints. Serious adverse events were similar among treatment groups. Adverse events resulting in premature withdrawal occurred in 20% of patients in the 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX group.ConclusionsTCZ is effective in combination with MTX and as monotherapy for the treatment of patients with early RA.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01007435

Download Full-text

Efficacy and safety of peficitinib (ASP015K) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to conventional DMARDs: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial (RAJ3)

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215163 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 78 (10) ◽

pp. 1320-1332 ◽

Cited By ~ 32

Author(s):

Yoshiya Tanaka ◽

Tsutomu Takeuchi ◽

Sakae Tanaka ◽

Atsushi Kawakami ◽

Manabu Iwasaki ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Response Rates ◽

Janus Kinase ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Inadequate Response ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Double Blind ◽

Acr20 Response ◽

Once Daily ◽

Conventional Dmards

ObjectivesTo investigate the efficacy and safety of peficitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsIn this double-blind phase III study, patients with RA and an inadequate response to prior disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were randomised to peficitinib 100 mg once daily, peficitinib 150 mg once daily, placebo or open-label etanercept for 52 weeks’ treatment; placebo-treated patients were switched at week 12 to peficitinib 100 or 150 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20 response at week 12/early termination (ET). Secondary endpoints (assessed throughout) included ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 response, changes from baseline in disease activity scores (DAS)28 and ACR core parameters, adverse events (AEs) and changes in clinical or laboratory measurements.ResultsIn total, 507 patients received treatment. ACR20 response rates at week 12/ET were significantly higher in the peficitinib 100 mg (57.7%) and 150 mg (74.5%) groups versus placebo (30.7%) (p<0.001). ACR50/70 response rates were also higher for both peficitinib doses versus placebo. Improvements in ACR response were maintained until week 52. Changes from baseline in DAS28-C-reactive protein/erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the ACR core set were significantly greater for both peficitinib doses versus placebo at week 12/ET (p<0.001). AE incidence was similar across treatment arms. Incidence of serious infection and herpes zoster-related disease was higher with peficitinib versus placebo, but with no clear dose-dependent increase.ConclusionsIn patients with RA and inadequate response to DMARDs, peficitinib 100 mg once daily or 150 mg once daily was efficacious in reducing RA symptoms and was well tolerated compared with placebo.Trial registration numberNCT02308163.

Download Full-text

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Custom Foot Orthoses for the Treatment of Plantar Heel Pain

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association ◽

10.7547/13-122.1 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 105 (4) ◽

pp. 281-294 ◽

Cited By ~ 17

Author(s):

James S. Wrobel ◽

Adam E. Fleischer ◽

Ryan T. Crews ◽

Beth Jarrett ◽

Bijan Najafi

Keyword(s):

Physical Activity ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Plantar Fasciitis ◽

Short Form ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Heel Pain ◽

Foot Orthoses ◽

Double Blind ◽

Sf 36 ◽

Spontaneous Physical Activity

Background Up to 10% of people will experience heel pain. The purpose of this prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was to compare custom foot orthoses (CFO), prefabricated foot orthoses (PFO), and sham insole treatment for plantar fasciitis. Methods Seventy-seven patients with plantar fasciitis for less than 1 year were included. Outcome measures included first step and end of day pain, Revised Foot Function Index short form (FFI-R), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), activity monitoring, balance, and gait analysis. Results The CFO group had significantly improved total FFI-R scores (77.4 versus 57.2; P = .03) without group differences for FFI-R pain, SF-36, and morning or evening pain. The PFO and CFO groups reported significantly lower morning and evening pain. For activity, the CFO group demonstrated significantly longer episodes of walking over the sham (P = .019) and PFO (P = .03) groups, with a 125% increase for CFOs, 22% PFOs, and 0.2% sham. Postural transition duration (P = .02) and balance (P = .05) improved for the CFO group. There were no gait differences. The CFO group reported significantly less stretching and ice use at 3 months. Conclusions The CFO group demonstrated 5.6-fold greater improvements in spontaneous physical activity versus the PFO and sham groups. All three groups improved in morning pain after treatment that included standardized athletic shoes, stretching, and ice. The CFO changes may have been moderated by decreased stretching and ice use after 3 months. These findings suggest that more objective measures, such as spontaneous physical activity improvement, may be more sensitive and specific for detecting improved weightbearing function than traditional clinical outcome measures, such as pain and disease-specific quality of life.

Download Full-text